Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:37:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
|
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
712
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
1: I much as I would enjoy that, I would say no, because the medium & light frames need some kind of AV weapon.
2: The Plasma Cannon is more an AI weapon imo, unless your going against a Gunnlogi.
3: 1.5 is coming soon, like 2-3 weeks, in which case we'll see how good WM did with the balancing. |
R'adeh Hunt
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
436
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right?
As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
712
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense.
We're not going back to that bullshit we had in Replication. |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. yes that's why 25% of dropships are shot down within the first 2 minutes of every game and 50% at the next 5, 20% lose control when hit with swarm laucher and the last 5% make it out alive because they have a prototype dropship
as for the tanks the point that the 10% that stay at the edge of the red line says enough the other 90% either get blown up immediately or get destroyed later in the match says it all
look this solution could be destroyed if we had some sort of countermeasure to the swarm launcher say like flares with HSM in bf3 |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. absolutely just along with the update include new plasma cannons that can target armor instead of shields |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
I'll admit I was a bit surprised to find the Swarm Launcher was a light weapon when I first started playing. On the topic of making it a heavy weapon, i'm not sure how I feel about that. The ideal solution for any matchup issues should be (in my opinion) team work. I'm not a driver, but over the past week or so it seems to me that Infantry VS Tank battles can go either way, depending on teamwork and tactics. As much sense as it makes to me to have the Swarm be heavy, making this switch is going to light up the forums with QQing and respect demands (god knows there is enough of that already).
I still say the best way to protect a tank is LLAV+ 1-3 ground troops. All bases are (for the most part) covered with this method, and even better the tank needs to worry much less about retreating, letting it focus on attack and making it pretty powerful (and letting the ground troops feel nice and safe).
Definitely an interesting proposition though, can't really say I feel too strongly about it either way. |
R'adeh Hunt
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
436
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 20:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. absolutely just along with the update include new plasma cannons that can target armor instead of shields
The problem of the plasma cannon isn't the damage type!! It's hit detection and an incredibly slow projectile which makes it totally ineffective against vehicles. |
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
323
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 21:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
If I were to be the one that had to choose what class a weapon was to fall into I would have said that a swarm launcher would be a heavy weapon.
Amarr have lasers and that heavy weapon is coming.
Gallente have short range blaster (rail) tech and that is coming I guess.
Minmatar have projectile and we have the HMG.
Caldari always have two types of weapons GÇö long range rail and missiles.
Hence, the forge gun is the rail tech although I think it should have a reduced ranged. Long range is a relative term per the weapon in question after all.
So the swarm launcher would be the missile tech heavy weapon.
Combine this with the choice of ammo like in EVE and it would be awesome!
Think about being able to load in missile types for either armor piercing or flux for shields.
Make it a devastating weapon for someone trained well in it. Combine that with the heavy suit that can't move fast but can jump out of the way of a turret blast and can survive a turret shot better though not able to be very mobile unless using a vehicle and you have a pretty good balance.
That being said I wish they'd make weapons more dependent on skill training to be good. i.e. the sniper rifle. I'd like to stop hearing QQ about easy militia snipers vs. dedicated sniper players who've trained up to be useful. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
712
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 21:33:00 -
[10] - Quote
Dunk Mujunk wrote:I'll admit I was a bit surprised to find the Swarm Launcher was a light weapon when I first started playing. On the topic of making it a heavy weapon, i'm not sure how I feel about that. The ideal solution for any matchup issues should be (in my opinion) team work. I'm not a driver, but over the past week or so it seems to me that Infantry VS Tank battles can go either way, depending on teamwork and tactics. As much sense as it makes to me to have the Swarm be heavy, making this switch is going to light up the forums with QQing and respect demands (god knows there is enough of that already).
I still say the best way to protect a tank is LLAV+ 1-3 ground troops. All bases are (for the most part) covered with this method, and even better the tank needs to worry much less about retreating, letting it focus on attack and making it pretty powerful (and letting the ground troops feel nice and safe).
Definitely an interesting proposition though, can't really say I feel too strongly about it either way.
But that's vs. only 1 swarmer, which can still get to a position in which is impossible to be killed. I'm just going to wait until 1.5 and start laughing at swarms. |
|
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
712
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 21:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:If I were to be the one that had to choose what class a weapon was to fall into I would have said that a swarm launcher would be a heavy weapon.
Amarr have lasers and that heavy weapon is coming.
Gallente have short range blaster (rail) tech and that is coming I guess.
Minmatar have projectile and we have the HMG.
Caldari always have two types of weapons GÇö long range rail and missiles.
Hence, the forge gun is the rail tech although I think it should have a reduced ranged. Long range is a relative term per the weapon in question after all.
So the swarm launcher would be the missile tech heavy weapon.
Combine this with the choice of ammo like in EVE and it would be awesome!
Think about being able to load in missile types for either armor piercing or flux for shields.
Make it a devastating weapon for someone trained well in it. Combine that with the heavy suit that can't move fast but can jump out of the way of a turret blast and can survive a turret shot better though not able to be very mobile unless using a vehicle and you have a pretty good balance.
That being said I wish they'd make weapons more dependent on skill training to be good. i.e. the sniper rifle. I'd like to stop hearing QQ about easy militia snipers vs. dedicated sniper players who've trained up to be useful.
1: The only Amarr heavy Weapon that I know of has nothing to do with Lasers
2: Blasters aren't rails, and the Gallente heavy weapon is still unknown.
3: Yes, I agree that the FG's need less range.
4: The (other) Caldari Heavy weapon is a LMG-like weapon called the Gauss Rifle. The swarm is a Light weapon, and will stay that way.
|
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
1118
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 21:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Well.... The problem the Plasma cannon sucks.... :/ |
Everything Dies
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
95
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 21:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. yes that's why 25% of dropships are shot down within the first 2 minutes of every game and 50% at the next 5, 20% lose control when hit with swarm laucher and the last 5% make it out alive because they have a prototype dropship as for the tanks the point that the 10% that stay at the edge of the red line says enough the other 90% either get blown up immediately or get destroyed later in the match says it all look this solution could be destroyed if we had some sort of countermeasure to the swarm launcher say like flares with HSM in bf3 1. I've seen plenty of dropships outrun multiple volleys from launchers. If they're getting killed that quickly, it's likely due to rail/forge guns. An obvious solution would be to eliminate the delay in having dropships "delivered" to the battlefield, as they're sitting ducks that can't (usually) even take two swarms.
2. I'm still seeing plenty of souped-up Maggies and Gunnis absolutely dominate matches with their blaster turrets. Red-lining makes more sense if you're running a tank solo with a rail gun and can act as more of an artillery battery.
3. A tank that is constantly moving shouldn't have any trouble finding cover to hide behind. The ones dying are typically the ones using blaster turrets that will sit out in the open (usually at a spawn point and racking up kills.) |
echo47
Sebiestor Field Sappers Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. yes that's why 25% of dropships are shot down within the first 2 minutes of every game and 50% at the next 5, 20% lose control when hit with swarm laucher and the last 5% make it out alive because they have a prototype dropship as for the tanks the point that the 10% that stay at the edge of the red line says enough the other 90% either get blown up immediately or get destroyed later in the match says it all look this solution could be destroyed if we had some sort of countermeasure to the swarm launcher say like flares with HSM in bf3
Reference for stats please. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
1130
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Just wait for 1.5 Swarms need a little tweak down in power, the lock is what make the swarms strong
|
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:If I were to be the one that had to choose what class a weapon was to fall into I would have said that a swarm launcher would be a heavy weapon.
Amarr have lasers and that heavy weapon is coming.
Gallente have short range blaster (rail) tech and that is coming I guess.
Minmatar have projectile and we have the HMG.
Caldari always have two types of weapons GÇö long range rail and missiles.
Hence, the forge gun is the rail tech although I think it should have a reduced ranged. Long range is a relative term per the weapon in question after all.
So the swarm launcher would be the missile tech heavy weapon.
Combine this with the choice of ammo like in EVE and it would be awesome!
Think about being able to load in missile types for either armor piercing or flux for shields.
Make it a devastating weapon for someone trained well in it. Combine that with the heavy suit that can't move fast but can jump out of the way of a turret blast and can survive a turret shot better though not able to be very mobile unless using a vehicle and you have a pretty good balance.
That being said I wish they'd make weapons more dependent on skill training to be good. i.e. the sniper rifle. I'd like to stop hearing QQ about easy militia snipers vs. dedicated sniper players who've trained up to be useful. I think for the different weapon ammo's we can look to borderlands 2 assault rifles they have ( not to mention ammo elements ) |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
echo47 wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. yes that's why 25% of dropships are shot down within the first 2 minutes of every game and 50% at the next 5, 20% lose control when hit with swarm laucher and the last 5% make it out alive because they have a prototype dropship as for the tanks the point that the 10% that stay at the edge of the red line says enough the other 90% either get blown up immediately or get destroyed later in the match says it all look this solution could be destroyed if we had some sort of countermeasure to the swarm launcher say like flares with HSM in bf3 Reference for stats please. no reference rough estimate based on personal experience and observation. |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Just wait for 1.5 Swarms need a little tweak down in power, the lock is what make the swarms strong good idea. Though these are just fine tune suggestions that I believe will help even the game out.
|
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Thought I might mention.... I use a prototype heavy sentinel suit with a hmg so I usually don't find myself in a anti vehicle battle unless its a default lav or dropship... |
8213
Grade No.2
273
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. |
|
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. if in world war one it took a guy with a grenade to destroy a tank.... ( av grenades ) I do not believe that the they would have been developed them at all. |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
24
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 22:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. absolutely just along with the update include new plasma cannons that can target armor instead of shields The problem of the plasma cannon isn't the damage type!! It's hit detection and an incredibly slow projectile which makes it totally ineffective against vehicles. then they should speed up the projectile speed. |
Dunk Mujunk
RestlessSpirits D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
79
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote: if in world war one it took a guy with a grenade to destroy a tank.... ( av grenades ) I do not believe that the they would have been developed them at all.
Bad reference and good reference all in one.
Bad Reference- The tanks of WW1 had virtually no armor. The thin metal sheeting could be punctured by pretty much any weapon on the battle field at the time. Pretty sure a child could put a bayonet through the armor. WW1 era grenades easily sent shrapnel through tank armor.
Good Reference- One of the reasons militaries of the time stuck with tanks was because militaries started using proper tactics with them. They started with one or two leading an infantry charge (though the tanks of the day were slower than units on foot due to weak power plants/ mucky terrain), but soon found the best way to use them was grouping them all together and sending an actual tank unit supported by infantry.
Interestingly enough, when WW2 started the French tanks of the time were much better than the German tanks (the Tiger and Panther were not around at the start of WW2, and the Panzers of that time were much weaker than the Panzers of late/ WW2). Unfortunately, French tank tactics were poor to say the least and they chose to spread their tanks out along the Maginot Line as infantry support. Germany then pooled all its armor together and punched clean through.
I've seen enough tankers (in and out of my Corp) succeed in Dust to say that maybe some folks need to reevaluate their tactics and strategies.
A heavy with a Forge isn't always viable to run in a match, a sniper isn't always viable to run in a match, hell sometimes even my God Stick (AR) isn't the best tool to use. Sometimes you may have to recall that tank, or maybe not even bring it out to begin with. |
knockmysockoff
Immortal Retribution
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually.
Hey that's not even that expensive, my assault dropship is 600,000 ISK and it has way less shields and armor than you tank |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
736
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:29:00 -
[25] - Quote
I support it. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
736
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:30:00 -
[26] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:1: I much as I would enjoy that, I would say no, because the medium & light frames need some kind of AV weapon.
Lol packed Lai Dai + nanohive = dead tank |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
736
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:31:00 -
[27] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. It's called a sidearm. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
736
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:32:00 -
[28] - Quote
Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. yes that's why 25% of dropships are shot down within the first 2 minutes of every game and 50% at the next 5, 20% lose control when hit with swarm laucher and the last 5% make it out alive because they have a prototype dropship as for the tanks the point that the 10% that stay at the edge of the red line says enough the other 90% either get blown up immediately or get destroyed later in the match says it all look this solution could be destroyed if we had some sort of countermeasure to the swarm launcher say like flares with HSM in bf3 We don't have PRO vehicles. |
True Adamance
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
2035
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 00:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. Grenades being resupplied only at Supply depots would counteract the new double DPS of swarms. |
R'adeh Hunt
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
441
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 06:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually.
In other words, you think it's ok if pretty much the entire enemy team is taken away from objectives if you field a single tank....that's WRONG! |
|
R'adeh Hunt
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
441
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 06:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Bartimaeus of Achura wrote:I am going to keep this as short as possible
upgrade the swam launchers to a heavy weapon it would reduce the amount of people running around the battle with a lock on weapon, and most would have to switch to the plasma cannon instead of investing in a entirely new suit this would help with the drop ships as well.
hope you all consider my solution thank you.
Right...because the plasma cannon is sooooo effective against tanks...right? As a swarm launcher you're already penalised by being a lot less effective against infantry (at least a forge gun can still kill infantry!). Making AV even less accessible is nonsense. Grenades being resupplied only at Supply depots would counteract the new double DPS of swarms.
Both grenades and swarms are fine...as a tanker, get some infantry to deal with the AV guys! In real life tanks have infantry support too... |
Lorhak Gannarsein
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
389
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 07:04:00 -
[32] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually.
damn, I wish my tanks were 400k.
I don't go lower than 700k, and usually 1M+. It's a pain in the arse when I lose one. |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
553
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 08:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
8213 wrote:Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. such comments is proof that people have absotuly no clue or simply lack the skill. tank is a zoning tool and force multiplier, not a one man invincible killing machine. you are paying to being immune to the majority of weapons, huge range and damage not to be invincible. yes, it is a team game, this means a tank needs support from his team, not the other way around.
4-5 guys stopping a tank is not fair and I suggest that you leave tanks in the garage if you actually expect this because this is never going to happen. it would create artificial number advantage the moment a tank shows up and it would over time change the game into tanks 514. dont discuss about tank balance if you dont understand this because you only insult your own intelligence with such comments. world of tanks is that way => |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
27
|
Posted - 2013.09.17 23:00:00 -
[34] - Quote
Not all updates are popular but if it helps improve the game then they can be good. think about it where would battlefield three be if they didn't fix the usas 12/frag rounds? |
Abraham LincoIn
Cassardis Training Firm
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 00:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
agreed. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
1667
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 00:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. Why do tankers ALWAYS forget that you can't just run a swarm launcher and win like that. My good AV suit cost me 100k a suit (My best one is 160k) and you guys can kill me 5x faster then I can kill you. |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
31
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. Why do tankers ALWAYS forget that you can't just run a swarm launcher and win like that. My good AV suit cost me 100k a suit (My best one is 160k) and you guys can kill me 5x faster then I can kill you. have you ever tried to hit some one with a large railgun before? no? ok stop. now |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
3343
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 21:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually.
By this argument, it shouldn't be possible for someone to kill my protosuit with standard weaponry.
A team shooter does not mean that it should take 4-5 people to 'try' to take out your solo tank. If there were a squad of tankers spider-tanking, then certainly that would be much more reasonable. Whining that your solo machine isn't nigh on invincible is ridiculous - Price alone doesn't justify an entire squad to take out you alone.
If I bring flux grenades and a scrambler rifle (all standard gear) which costs peanuts, in order to kill a prototype shield tanker who has a 200k suit, should I be completely unable to kill him unless I bring at least three other people with me? |
Bartimaeus of Achura
Cassardis
31
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 00:46:00 -
[39] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:8213 wrote:I'm sorry, but a tank is usually 400,000 ISK
So a 60,000 ISK Swarm Launcher shouldn't be able to single handedly take down a tank.
Tanks are expensive, and are supposed to be a nightmare on the battlefield(if used properly). It's a team shooters, so people should team up on the tank.
4-5 guys trying to take out a tank sounds fair actually. By this argument, it shouldn't be possible for someone to kill my protosuit with standard weaponry. A team shooter does not mean that it should take 4-5 people to 'try' to take out your solo tank. If there were a squad of tankers spider-tanking, then certainly that would be much more reasonable. Whining that your solo machine isn't nigh on invincible is ridiculous - Price alone doesn't justify an entire squad to take out you alone. If I bring flux grenades and a scrambler rifle (all standard gear) which costs peanuts, in order to kill a prototype shield tanker who has a 200k suit, should I be completely unable to kill him unless I bring at least three other people with me? so your comparing a tank vs a person in a assault suite to a standard assault rifle vs a assault proto suite.... not a good comparison. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |