I take it you didn't click my links, then?

Or at best, you failed to work out what I meant by them.

I mostly play PS3 games because my laptop is barely running WinXP right now and doesn't really do gaming.

I don't like the aim assist in DUST either.

What's your excuse for the many people like me who are console gamers who don't like what CCP have done with their aim assist?

Most console shooters have aim assist, but often it's only the kind CCP refer to as "aim friction", which has been present for ages, never got turned off, and isn't connected with the aim assist on/off toggle in the options menu.

no, I didn't click on the links.

the issue is about M/KB vs Controller, nothing else matters in that sense.

And the links totally reshape the meaning behind my words. Take a look.

Then turn aim assist off... If the majority of people give some valid reasons why the aim assist should be tweaked then that's on CCP to finish the job off.

I, however, haven't gotten my hands on 1.4 yet. So I can't REALLY tell you my thoughts on aim assist until then.

it goes back the problem at hand, this is NOT a PC game, it is a CONSOLE game.

otherwise it would be available on the PC market, it is not, its only available on the playstaion market, which is a console

Jeez. I wish all of you would shut the hell up about the aim assist. I don't see its supposed miracle like effects. In my own findings my performance is about the same as it has been the only thing I have really noticed is that my hip fire is a lot more accurate at close range. Honestly, do you think this flood of tears is going to change any thing? Its just more qq, so please grab a towel and dry your eyes and gtfo k?

It's the hip fire that performs better than it should

Just like the example of a PC game with in-depth stats that I used was Armored Core, which is a CONSOLE game for the CONSOLE market with more complex walls of text and numbers than the majority of PC games out there, and my example of how console games are dumbed down compared with the complexity of PC games was Doom, which you should probably have heard of by now.

oh yes iv heard all your PC vs Console arguments, in these forums, youtube and many other sites.

the fact remains, consoles are different from PCs and the games on each platform should not cater to those who are not playing the game in the intended platform, if you want to use your M/KB, go play a PC game, if you want to use a controller, go play a console game, simple as that, you cannot make a console game and expect it to act similarly to a PC game. that's like trying to eat ice-cream with a pair of tongs over an oven.

this game is not created for PC gamers, it was created for console gamers to get introduced to the eve universe through their side.

your just lucky that CCP let you use your accessories to play this game.

It's a PS3 game. Why don't you just use the gamepad? Now, I love using keyboard and mouse as much as anyone. It's the heart of every FPS game, but I don't have that option so I am stuck with the gamepad. It's really not that hard to just learn how to use the gamepad.

And the point I was making is that Meeko's post claimed console players can't deal with complex games and need everything dumbed down for them. That's blatantly not true for a large enough portion of console gamers to support a series of more than 15 games with some of the most intricate stat-driven customisation in gaming.

Do all you guys realize PS4 is fully KB/M supported?

in every FPS for consoles, there is aim assist, this game shouldn't be an exception because a few PC gamers are playing it.

SOCOM 1, 2 and 3 beg to differ.

Before someone argues the point that those were TPS's, they could also be played in first person. Either way, they didn't have and didn't need aim assist... because console gamers didn't suck back then.

Apparently they do now.

iv played them before, amazingly my copies of the games allowed me to have aim assist on, I just went to options and found it, I ended up trading them in because the games sucked.

if your originally looking through 3r person view, then its a TPS

SOCOM 1, 2 and 3 beg to differ.

Before someone argues the point that those were TPS's, they could also be played in first person. Either way, they didn't have and didn't need aim assist... because console gamers didn't suck back then.

Apparently they do now.

Protip: Aim assist in SOCOM 1, 2 and 3 did not work online. At all. Ever. Not in any of them.

who says I played online, I lost interest in the storyline

SOCOM 1, 2 and 3 beg to differ.

Before someone argues the point that those were TPS's, they could also be played in first person. Either way, they didn't have and didn't need aim assist... because console gamers didn't suck back then.

Apparently they do now.

There was no aim assist needed simply because there was no kb/m support. MAG didn't have any aim assist either. You can't really be that blind, if controller is an aimbot, then use it. You'll probably find out that maybe controller users are just better than you at using controllers. it's not that aim assist thing.
You want competitive gameplay on a console?
Perfect. If you really want "competition" just use a controller like anybody else. As I already stated in another thread , there are many games where if you use even a specifically-build mouse for ps3 (FragFx for example) you are considered a cheater and not allowed in official tournaments and events. I remember Metal Gear Online, for example. hundreds of players have been banned because of that.

I just killed a man
Put a gun against his head
Pulled the trigger, now he's dead

Couldn't help it

Your entire post works on the assumption that I am a mouser.