Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
104
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Link Request that those who wish to provide positive and constructive feedback post. No QQ and no trolls please.
Thanks,
NPRZ
Director Subdreddit FEC Leadership |
Baracka Flocka Flame
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
767
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:No QQ and no trolls please.
Meh goodluck with that especially in this forum.
I know you will take this reply as a troll or me QQing or whatever you guys want to attack but...
It's nice to see this considered a glitch now when EoN does it but not before when others did it for weeks. Oh well. |
STABBEY
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
236
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:No QQ and no trolls please. Meh goodluck with that especially in this forum. I know you will take this reply as a troll or me QQing or whatever you guys want to attack but... It's nice to see this considered an exploit now when EoN does it but not before when others did it for weeks. Oh well.
This is being supported by not only the FEC but members of EoN too. Both sides have QQers, cut that **** out for once and support somthing that truely is to support the community and game.
Locking the districts to farm is a pathetic move, as well as making a large chunk of the board useless for those that really do want to fight.
So from me and many others that DO care about the game and not just our wallets, +1 . |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
963
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Am I wrong in saying that the defender don't get 50% of the attacker's remaining clones, unless the attacker brought more than 150 clones?
What I mean is that I don't think the defender gets those 50% of the initial 150 clones, but if the attacker brought 200 clones and only lost 150 (either in battle or via the minimum clone loss), then the defender would get 25 clones?
Other than that your post is pretty accurate. |
Baracka Flocka Flame
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
767
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:Baracka Flocka Flame wrote:NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:No QQ and no trolls please. Meh goodluck with that especially in this forum. I know you will take this reply as a troll or me QQing or whatever you guys want to attack but... It's nice to see this considered an exploit now when EoN does it but not before when others did it for weeks. Oh well. This is being supported by not only the FEC but members of EoN too. Both sides have QQers, cut that **** out for once and support somthing that truely is to support the community and game. Locking the districts to farm is a pathetic move, as well as making a large chunk of the board useless for those that really do want to fight. So from me and many others that DO care about the game and not just our wallets, +1 .
Not saying it belongs in the game or anything EoN complained about this at the start of PC but we were called QQ'ers at the time(lol). This thread is in the war room thats linked to another serious thread so i figured id put my reply here instead of the actual feedback thread.
Just funny how things change over time that's all.
|
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Am I wrong in saying that the defender don't get 50% of the attacker's remaining clones, unless the attacker brought more than 150 clones?
What I mean is that I don't think the defender gets those 50% of the initial 150 clones, but if the attacker brought 200 clones and only lost 150 (either in battle or via the minimum clone loss), then the defender would get 25 clones?
Other than that your post is pretty accurate.
That would be incorrect the defender does receive 50% of the attack clones to the district and the remaining 50% are how the winning isk reward is paid to the players. 36 million for a clone pack of 120, 60 clones to the district and 60 to the players at a rate of 300,000 per clone so for a maximum of 18 million isk reward to the defending players for winning. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
963
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:44:00 -
[7] - Quote
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:Am I wrong in saying that the defender don't get 50% of the attacker's remaining clones, unless the attacker brought more than 150 clones?
What I mean is that I don't think the defender gets those 50% of the initial 150 clones, but if the attacker brought 200 clones and only lost 150 (either in battle or via the minimum clone loss), then the defender would get 25 clones?
Other than that your post is pretty accurate. That would be incorrect the defender does receive 50% of the attack clones to the district and the remaining 50% are how the winning isk reward is paid to the players. 36 million for a clone pack of 120, 60 clones to the district and 60 to the players at a rate of 300,000 per clone so for a maximum of 18 million isk reward to the defending players for winning. Are you sure, because you only get 150k per clone killed?
Though like I said, everything else is accurate, so no matter what there's still a profit to be made when locking districts. |
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
107
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:Am I wrong in saying that the defender don't get 50% of the attacker's remaining clones, unless the attacker brought more than 150 clones?
What I mean is that I don't think the defender gets those 50% of the initial 150 clones, but if the attacker brought 200 clones and only lost 150 (either in battle or via the minimum clone loss), then the defender would get 25 clones?
Other than that your post is pretty accurate. That would be incorrect the defender does receive 50% of the attack clones to the district and the remaining 50% are how the winning isk reward is paid to the players. 36 million for a clone pack of 120, 60 clones to the district and 60 to the players at a rate of 300,000 per clone so for a maximum of 18 million isk reward to the defending players for winning. Are you sure, because you only get 150k per clone killed? Though like I said, everything else is accurate, so no matter what there's still a profit to be made when locking districts.
The clones are sold from the district at a rate of 150,000 isk per clone and are worth 300,000 isk to the players on their reward. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
963
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 16:49:00 -
[9] - Quote
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote:The clones are sold from the district at a rate of 150,000 isk per clone and are worth 300,000 isk to the players on their reward. Unless they stealth changed it since this then it's 150k per clone both sold and killed. |
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 18:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Well I just lost some respect for the Team Players.
You do know you can't take your ISK with you. |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1112
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 19:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
locking yourself up started with cronos and everyone asked for a fix
The reply from ccp: Lolmaybein10years, wedon'tknowhow. |
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
208
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 19:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:locking yourself up started with cronos and everyone asked for a fix
The reply from ccp: Lolmaybein10years, wedon'tknowhow.
Back then at least it cost you ISK not earned you some. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1116
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 19:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
Hawkin P wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:locking yourself up started with cronos and everyone asked for a fix
The reply from ccp: Lolmaybein10years, wedon'tknowhow. Back then at least it cost you ISK not earned you some. Leave it to CCP to fix everything after 3 months, eh? |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
344
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 21:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. |
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 22:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs.
Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy!
Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore.
Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
1042
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 23:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. That would probably fix it, but it would take them giving a **** first. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
345
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset.
This is like buying up all the houses in monopoly. No Houses = No rent. The rules are very clearly laid out and we are following them to a T. The way to counter buying up all the houses in monopoly is to not let the dude get set up. You've had months and months to attack us. The LoI war was the ideal time. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
718
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. That would probably fix it, but it would take them giving a **** first. If CCP gave a shit well, we'd be in a different place... |
STABBEY
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
266
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. This is like buying up all the houses in monopoly. No Houses = No rent. The rules are very clearly laid out and we are following them to a T. The way to counter buying up all the houses in monopoly is to not let the dude get set up. You've had months and months to attack us. The LoI war was the ideal time.
No disrespect to you personally bud but...
You me and every1 else here know what Cubs (I only say CUBS because I know members of TP dont agree with his actions) is doing is petty bullsh!t so he can farm more isk instead of having to fight for it.
I dont care how you or he wants to spin what he's doing, Its GREED.
Following what rules?! You reading the handbook of COWARDS?
It isnt for "Good Fights" We brought the fights and when it got too tough for him he hid by locking his districts.
It's obvious what he did I dont care about months ago BLA BLA BLA.
We are talking about RIGHT NOW. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
345
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Hawkin P wrote:Well I just lost some respect for the Team Players.
You do know you can't take your ISK with you.
You(funny story) started this war. You waged it with faceless masses. We don't have faceless masses, but we do have friends and resources. We have been accumulating resources(Districts and ISK) aggressively since PC started and we will be damned if our massive material advantage isn't going to be the weapon we fight it with if it is completely within the ruleset.
You stack timers, we stack timers. |
|
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
703
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Exploits everywhere...sad... TP is doing this right now..just saying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eoj_Dvscv2s&feature=youtube_gdata_player |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2400
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. This is like buying up all the houses in monopoly. No Houses = No rent. The rules are very clearly laid out and we are following them to a T. The way to counter buying up all the houses in monopoly is to not let the dude get set up. You've had months and months to attack us. The LoI war was the ideal time.
This is such a ridiculous argument. It's just so disingenious, and doesn't really reflect reality. I'm just going to copy/pasta my response in the the bugs forum thread, because it's just as relevant to your post as it was over there:
I wrote:The problem is that you guys acquired all of this land while PC was unplayable to a large chunk of the playerbase due to lag and memory leaks, and while the balance was arguably as skewed and "broken" as it's ever been towards a few FOTM setups.
Heck, I'd be surprised if the majority of players even realized you guys were grabbing so much land, most of us didn't even look at the stats for PC for months. Now that the majority of the technical problems with PC are fixed, and the game is a little bit more balanced, everyone takes another look at the game mode and lo and behold; 1 group seems to own most of the territory.
Now, this would be fine if the equilibrium could be fixed by attacking your districts and whittling down your hold to just the amount of districts you guys can hold (which was the main intent of the FEC). Unfortunately, with the broken mechanic of being able to "lock down" your districts and still turn a profit, you can pretty much sit on all that land inevitably.
Is this your fault? No. You guys saw an opportunity and took it. Unfortunately for you guys though, just like so many other aspects of the game, CCP's mistakes are going to have to negatively effect someone in order to fix them.
So, if you guys want to sit on those districts and leave them locked indefinitely, then go for it, it just helps prove how broken the game mode really is. However, if you don't want to sit on them and keep them locked, then it looks to me like you're either going to keep getting attacked until you reach a size that you can hold on your own, or you can step up to the negotiating table and meet the demands of the FEC.
The cheap way, the hard way, or the easy way.
Your choice. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
345
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 01:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Hawkin P wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Easy. Just double the price on clone packs. Funny you see what he did there? You sir are a witty guy! Well, I am positive CCP won't do anything about it until we don't care anymore. Constructively CCP could announce this glitch a violation of TOS, and that it will be monitored and any corp or person caught still using this exploit after 5 days of the announcement, will have their account banned, or reset. This is like buying up all the houses in monopoly. No Houses = No rent. The rules are very clearly laid out and we are following them to a T. The way to counter buying up all the houses in monopoly is to not let the dude get set up. You've had months and months to attack us. The LoI war was the ideal time. This is such a ridiculous argument. It's just so disingenious, and doesn't really reflect reality. I'm just going to copy/pasta my response in the the bugs forum thread, because it's just as relevant to your post as it was over there: I wrote:The problem is that you guys acquired all of this land while PC was unplayable to a large chunk of the playerbase due to lag and memory leaks, and while the balance was arguably as skewed and "broken" as it's ever been towards a few FOTM setups.
Heck, I'd be surprised if the majority of players even realized you guys were grabbing so much land, most of us didn't even look at the stats for PC for months. Now that the majority of the technical problems with PC are fixed, and the game is a little bit more balanced, everyone takes another look at the game mode and lo and behold; 1 group seems to own most of the territory.
Now, this would be fine if the equilibrium could be fixed by attacking your districts and whittling down your hold to just the amount of districts you guys can hold (which was the main intent of the FEC). Unfortunately, with the broken mechanic of being able to "lock down" your districts and still turn a profit, you can pretty much sit on all that land inevitably.
Is this your fault? No. You guys saw an opportunity and took it. Unfortunately for you guys though, just like so many other aspects of the game, CCP's mistakes are going to have to negatively effect someone in order to fix them.
So, if you guys want to sit on those districts and leave them locked indefinitely, then go for it, it just helps prove how broken the game mode really is. However, if you don't want to sit on them and keep them locked, then it looks to me like you're either going to keep getting attacked until you reach a size that you can hold on your own, or you can step up to the negotiating table and meet the demands of the FEC.
The cheap way, the hard way, or the easy way.
Your choice.
We earned all of our districts fair and square. Most of the corps that we took the districts from, didn't show up or showed up with like 4 guys and ringers.. PC has been playable for months now. And still we marched on. Because we DO like a good fight... but most of the matches launched were red-line- pubstomp that were never intended to do anything but waste our time. Granted some corporations showed up ready, but the vast majority of the attacks were designed to take us away from playing the good games. Also: Neither side is in a position to make "Demands". Locked or not, I think we have a strong position. We've used this time to stomp out the fires. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2404
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:13:00 -
[24] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:
We earned all of our districts fair and square. Most of the corps that we took the districts from, didn't show up or showed up with like 4 guys and ringers.. PC has been playable for months now. And still we marched on. Because we DO like a good fight... but most of the matches launched were red-line- pubstomp that were never intended to do anything but waste our time. Granted some corporations showed up ready, but the vast majority of the attacks were designed to take us away from playing the good games. Also: Neither side is in a position to make "Demands". Locked or not, I think we have a strong position. We've used this time to stomp out the fires.
You're in a "strong position" because you can lock your districts at will. If you could fight and hold your districts, you would do so. If you want to prove otherwise, then stop hiding and fight the FEC without exploiting wonky game mechanics. Like it or not, there are demands being made, but you're right that they don't have much bite. Why? Because again, you guys can just hole up and make money indefinitely and only fight when YOU want to.
Furthermore, to say that PC has been "playable for months" is a ******* joke. It STILL isn't playable, but now not because of the memory leaks and lag spikes that were a problem until very recently, or the ridiculously boring FOTM issues with Flaylocks, and before that CalLogis. Instead, it's because the people who bothered to play through the trash gameplay and amass an empire fighting, as you yourself have admitted, small groups of unorganized players (because, why bother with PC, it was broken) now own most of the land simply by virtue of being willing to play a bad game mode on a broken game when no one else cared.
So, cool for you, I guess, for playing when it was terrible, but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. Instead, you helped perpetuate the problems by keeping the numbers up in a literally broken game mode, took most of the land, earned billions of ISK, and can now exploit the continued broken mechanics to insulate yourselves from having to actually defend your land.
I mean, get real. |
Fiddlestaxp
TeamPlayers EoN.
345
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:21:00 -
[25] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote: but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. .
I've heard it all. |
Patrick57
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
78
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Baal Roo wrote: but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. . I've heard it all. One time you nearly killed me with the melee glitch/exploit thingy |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2405
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Baal Roo wrote: but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. . I've heard it all.
based on your quote, it looks like you only "heard" one sentence. |
STABBEY
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
266
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:33:00 -
[28] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:Fiddlestaxp wrote:Baal Roo wrote: but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. . I've heard it all. based on your quote, it looks like you only "heard" one sentence.
I'd say ignore the idiots bro, you cant make stupid understand things. (My ex gf was the same way)
He dosent know wtf he's talking about and theres no excuse or reason in the world they will be able to come up with to condone the actions of a GREEDY COWARD/COWARDS. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
705
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:41:00 -
[29] - Quote
So if the melee exploit should be bannable then what about locking of districts? Just saying both are pathetic and no excuse will ever change that |
STABBEY
Black Phoenix Mercenaries
268
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:So if the melee exploit should be bannable then what about locking of districts? Just saying both are pathetic and no excuse will ever change that
I think they should be stripped of ISK made off said cowardly act and be fined per district, per day for using this to hurt the game.
OR be stripped of the districts totally. |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1119
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 02:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:So if the melee exploit should be bannable then what about locking of districts? Just saying both are pathetic and no excuse will ever change that I think they should be stripped of ISK made of said cowardly act and be fined per district, per day for using this to hurt the game. OR be stripped of the districts totally. If the melee glitchers get banned I'd be fine with this. |
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
215
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 04:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
Fiddlestaxp wrote:Hawkin P wrote:Well I just lost some respect for the Team Players.
You do know you can't take your ISK with you. You(funny story) started this war. You waged it with faceless masses. We don't have faceless masses, but we do have friends and resources. We have been accumulating resources(Districts and ISK) aggressively since PC started and we will be damned if our massive material advantage isn't going to be the weapon we fight it with if it is completely within the ruleset. You stack timers, we stack timers.
This is the last I will say on this matter, because this thread has roamed into troll country. What we did was strategy what you are doing is taking advantage of an in game exploit (glitch). Which according to TOS is a violation.
Don't talk things no one in this thread is complaining about. No one is QQ'ing about you getting your ISK starved non-alliance minions to fight for you. This thread is not complaining about your massive ISK advantage. The OP of this thread has noticed how you have found an exploit in the game and you are using it to lock down your districts and make ISK in the process. Something your alliance knows full well, the game did not intend to let corps do. That is called glitching, and it is a violation of the TOS.
|
Hawkin P
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
216
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 04:22:00 -
[33] - Quote
Duplicate post |
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
840
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 06:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
ITT: Socialists. |
ConantheCimmerian
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 09:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
For the record, the mechanic is in the game. For now, **** it and stop whining. And the fights were just starting to get good. Now it's just sort of puttering along in a sort of 83 VW rabbit kind of way |
ConantheCimmerian
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 09:34:00 -
[36] - Quote
STABBEY wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:So if the melee exploit should be bannable then what about locking of districts? Just saying both are pathetic and no excuse will ever change that I think they should be stripped of ISK made off said cowardly act and be fined per district, per day for using this to hurt the game. OR be stripped of the districts totally.
Oh and and since I've not seen you in one fight....STFU |
superjoe360x
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
59
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 10:55:00 -
[37] - Quote
You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1148
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 11:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
Oh no - people hate TP! Hide yo kids, hide yo wife! |
superjoe360x
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
60
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 11:34:00 -
[39] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:superjoe360x wrote:You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
Oh no - people hate TP! Hide yo kids, hide yo wife! Hide yo districts |
superjoe360x
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
60
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 11:37:00 -
[40] - Quote
Im better at this then you so stop while you are ahead or keep going and look like an idiot.........There I go again. Look like an idiot. Ha |
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1156
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 11:39:00 -
[41] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:Im better at this then you so stop while you are ahead or keep going and look like an idiot.........There I go again. Look like an idiot. Ha It's okay - everyone loves to tell me that. It gives them some sort of satisfaction - like they make the rules that everyone else will simply just obey. If you say I'm looking stupid - then it must be true.
But then again - you're also the guy who says pub matches matter equally to PC matches. |
NAV HIV
The Generals EoN.
380
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 12:24:00 -
[42] - Quote
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE wrote: Link Request that those who wish to provide positive and constructive feedback post. No QQ and no trolls please. Thanks, NPRZ Director Subdreddit FEC Leadership
New Alliance ?! ^^^
Nerf FEC threads coming soon? LOL |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4167
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 12:45:00 -
[43] - Quote
Baal Roo wrote:
So, cool for you, I guess, for playing when it was terrible, but if all of you clowns would have sat it out like the rest of us; maybe CCP would have fixed things sooner. Instead, you helped perpetuate the problems by keeping the numbers up in a literally broken game mode, took most of the land, earned billions of ISK, and can now exploit the continued broken mechanics to insulate yourselves from having to actually defend your land.
I mean, get real.
why the hostilities? and i sure hope that wasnt directed @ EoN only cuz lets be REAL, most of the big alliances were in PC no one was sittin out anything.
Kool PC is broken......isnt that the theme of DUST? the entire game is broken so by this logic shouldnt all u "clowns" stop playing pubs and DUST in general so maybe CCP can fix it sooner? instead u help perpetuate the problems by keepin numbers up (i lol'd) in a literally broken game
cwutididthere? |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
1490
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 14:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
we have. plain and simple.
now on the brighter side I fully agree with some of this. smaller corps are greatly improving and alliances as well. that is what we are all for. Many are to the point they are ready for PC, and are getting in as we speak.
think of it as a car dealership. the masses attacking everything was simply an annoyance. AFRAID? cant go there. we spent a week defending ALL of them (minus 1) AND taking several more in the same timespan.
As ive stated numerous times I want what you all want, balance restored to Molden Heath.
the similarities end when many of you believe we should just 'hand' everything over at no cost to the new guy, for no justifiable reason other than 'you have too much as it is'
the land is for sale, at more than reasonable pricing. if you weren't all cheap a$$es everything would already be back in the balance... so it takes time
*shameless plug*
Hit me up in game or on Skype: chicagocubsnbears
districts for sale to all (except nikia, Kujo, and if Eclipze ever surfaced again) anyone else I am totally fine with doing business |
Vile Heathen
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
745
|
Posted - 2013.08.29 15:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Alls I knows is that first you wanted fights, now you lock your districts.
|
edguy 111
QcGOLD
3
|
Posted - 2013.08.30 07:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:superjoe360x wrote:You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
Oh no - people hate TP! Hide yo kids, hide yo wife! Hide yo districts BURN |
ConantheCimmerian
KNIGHTZ OF THE ROUND Public Disorder.
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 06:26:00 -
[47] - Quote
Dark legion should watch there own districts, I was there when SI redlined your balls off. |
GRIM GEAR
The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo
25
|
Posted - 2013.09.04 10:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
superjoe360x wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:superjoe360x wrote:You know it does sound like TP is scared now. All that talk that they do about their greatness and here they are hiding in a corner and shaking in their dropsuits. Even if you guys win this war I bet you lose alliance members and friends. The beginning of your end has started TP. You have made so many enemys that you will never be able to rest easy. Also while you hide and do nothing lots of smaller corps and alliances are getting better and better everyday. What makes you think you can hold out indefinitely against the influx of new alliances and various ppl that hate you guys and everything that you stand for because you guys will for sure be king nothings then.
Oh no - people hate TP! Hide yo kids, hide yo wife! Hide yo districts
Wait i thought they were already doing that? |
Military Advisor
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 09:16:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bump because I didn't hear this was fixed yet. |
Omareth Nasadra
QcGOLD
45
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 09:53:00 -
[50] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:STABBEY wrote:Heimdallr69 wrote:So if the melee exploit should be bannable then what about locking of districts? Just saying both are pathetic and no excuse will ever change that I think they should be stripped of ISK made of said cowardly act and be fined per district, per day for using this to hurt the game. OR be stripped of the districts totally. If the melee glitchers get banned I'd be fine with this. oh come on, i've died to eon melee glitcher as well, just look at all the red star that goes to the fence to defend arirana that still ring for your crap coalition too, and stop being hypocrite, you may be a good player but you qq much when you lose |
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1271
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 12:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
CRONOS does this, response - Its metagaming, u mad bro? GOML noobs
EoN does this, response - Its exploiting the game, you cheating, you afraid to lose?
Love the double standards from the community
Fact is it isnt cheating or exploiting anything, its a part of the game mechanics and if you want to do it go ahead because a corp is attacking another corps district so its fine - In other words 'Metagaming at its finest' |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
1066
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 13:26:00 -
[52] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:CRONOS does this, response - Its metagaming, u mad bro? GOML noobs
EoN does this, response - Its exploiting the game, you cheating, you afraid to lose?
Love the double standards from the community
Fact is it isnt cheating or exploiting anything, its a part of the game mechanics and if you want to do it go ahead because a corp is attacking another corps district so its fine - In other words 'Metagaming at its finest' Booo I have swarms, so say goodbye to your tank |
NINJAPIRATEROBOTZOMBIE
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
231
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:CRONOS does this, response - Its metagaming, u mad bro? GOML noobs
EoN does this, response - Its exploiting the game, you cheating, you afraid to lose?
Love the double standards from the community
Fact is it isnt cheating or exploiting anything, its a part of the game mechanics and if you want to do it go ahead because a corp is attacking another corps district so its fine - In other words 'Metagaming at its finest'
It is an exploit if someone is using it to protect themselves with no repercussions and making a profit while doing it. If you take away the profit then I agree knock yourself out at your own expense. It should be expensive to try and protect a district. |
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
1213
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
The entire PC mechanic needs to change.
It's not worth playing. I really, really, really hate the ringer mechanic. I think there should be a 20 clone penalty for every ringer you bring into the match.
Start there and I think you'd start to see some balance in PC. |
Heavy Salvo
Ill Omens
78
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:37:00 -
[55] - Quote
the only thing that caught my eye through this whole thread...
Who let the Knightz of the round guy go around talking smack? xD |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
1077
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 19:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:The entire PC mechanic needs to change.
It's not worth playing. I really, really, really hate the ringer mechanic. I think there should be a 20 clone penalty for every ringer you bring into the match.
Start there and I think you'd start to see some balance in PC. Ringers need balenced I'll make a long post later on the subject of ringers
and a idea to deal with them... and some other things such as PC, FW, and Corp Battles too. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders
1077
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 21:26:00 -
[57] - Quote
Okay, A bit of a rework of Corporations and related information.
First Corporations get split into 2 types
Faction Warfare
And
Standard
FW corps will go through a similar process that FW corps/individuals in EVE go through, Players may join FW battles only if they are in FW corporations, members of FW corps can get LPs, they cannot claim space in MH.
Standard Corporations may Claim Space in MH and do anything but cannot participate in FW battles.
Corp battles need returned to help prep for PC
PC battle Changes
Quarters can be moved to a high security system near the District to get into battles in that district making no single corporation to control a vast amount of space, and all corporate members are moved to that high security district for a fee 1k ISK per member + a flat 100k fee
Ringers can be used if they are in the same system but take the spot of two alliance members. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1933
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 22:03:00 -
[58] - Quote
Isn't Molon Labe locking their districts so STB won't attack? Delta Force has been under attack for days without a clone loss on Hrober plus a number of others. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
TeamPlayers EoN.
1663
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 16:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
actually Delta locks their own districts, soon as they unlock they send an attack then re-lock
funny how so many people QQ over this, yet do it themselves.
such a double standard ;)
REALLY funny when those locking districts have 1...or 2 districts.
just sayin.... not really the same scenario |
DaddyKillsEmAll
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
86
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 16:43:00 -
[60] - Quote
locking districts is for pu****...
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |