Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
899
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:36:00 -
[1] - Quote
In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. They buffed the swarms despite the entire community exclaiming current AV is too powerful for the current tanks and have been for months. They also ignored the communities effort to reach out to them and give them our feedback of what we want the swarm launcher to be like in this thread i have created: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=101971
No were in there is anyone discontent with current ROF or lock on times for swarms, we talk about completely different methods in balancing the weapon and none of it is taken into consideration, they just straight buffed them.
This guy explains how it has been sence uprising, whats going on now and what is to come:
Sgt Buttscratch wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:As several people mentioned above this post, I would like to point out that you will have to re-lock your target between shots with the swarm launcher. It's not a case of lock->fire->0.2sec delay->fire. It's Lock->fire-0.2sec delay->lock->fire->0.2sec delay. That doesn't change the fact, they are already powerful as ****, why are they being improved. Maybe you could make a teleporting insta hit version while ya there....oh wait invisible swarms are already here. What you the magical CCP are not understanding is that if someone is 350m away from my tank he is way out of render range, this gives him invisible swarms, so he fires one volley, at the flight speed, before they even hit, he already launched volley number 2 so we get 2 sets of invisi swarms, no reliable hit detection display on where they came from, another beautiful invisi swarm benefit. So we have to keep running to avoid, though we are running blind, possibly moving into an area that is still in his view and range. The only viable way to tank will be redline rail sniping, on a rocker postion, so we can roll over hit a few shots then roll back into cover. So beta had spider tanking, we have trapdoor spider tanking, without the ability to detect motion. AV should not be touched in udate 1.4, It should be configured and released with Update 1.5, AV and Vehicles should ALWAYS be configured, tested and released together. Half your problem right now is the fact you went ahead and released ADV/PRO/OFFICER(rare) grade AV, whilst vehicles have bugged properties(resistances wrongly penalized, reps not working correctly[tho this benfits amor tanks it is nontheless a bug, PG skill not working right etc.) and are only available in MLT(Sica and Soma), ADV MLT(Vayu and Falchion), and STD(Madruger and Gunloggi). Which instantly bring inbalance, that has been left for months, and the 1st sign of any AV or Vehicle adjustments come in the form of making forge guns easier to use and swarmers deadlier.
So, CCP sees the community hurting over the imbalance of vehicals getting their ass kicked too hard by AV. So, taking the initiative with 1.4 they buff AV again. Then, intelligent ppl like this guy above puts in some very analitcal and correct input, and the only response we get from CCP so far is:
CCP Logibro wrote:As several people mentioned above this post, I would like to point out that you will have to re-lock your target between shots with the swarm launcher. It's not a case of lock->fire->0.2sec delay->fire. It's Lock->fire-0.2sec delay->lock->fire->0.2sec delay.
His response is telling us how screwing over vehicals is being improved. AV is too strong? buff it. I cant imagine why they would do this now when they already said:
CCP Wolfman wrote:We'll be taking a look at the plasma cannon along with all AV weapons as part of the vehicle work we are doing in 1.5.
Im worry uprising will continue to be very biased towards vehicals. CCP just simply doesent want to balance them, i cant think of any other reason why their going about the vehicals so poorly. If 1.5 doesent save it for the vehicals users were loosing playbase lol. Wel see if anyone will want their stuff when we find out what their stuff does |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
218
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
+1 excellent point. Be careful though. CCP doesnt like it when people prove them wrong beyond a reasonable doubt. What I see here soon is the locking of all swarm threads and then the banning of all of us who have proved our case that a buff was the last thing that swarms needed. |
Void Echo
Echo Galactic Industries
997
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
sad isnt it? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5867
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it.
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
900
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:+1 excellent point. Be careful though. CCP doesnt like it when people prove them wrong beyond a reasonable doubt. What I see here soon is the locking of all swarm threads and then the banning of all of us who have proved our case that a buff was the last thing that swarms needed.
I have been banned before for being right lol.... right when i called the heavy nerf. Hopefully it happens again cuz it was really funny |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
641
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:49:00 -
[6] - Quote
Get rid of vehicles so this game is dull like cod cuz that's what they are doing and its sad this game had so much promise too and they keep going backwards |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
581
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
my brain might not be so awesome that I can perfectly picture the way that something is going to work with exact clarity.
however, I can do basic math. which CCP apparently can't. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
903
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it.
but.... how can he say "we dont know how it will go, you cant tell the future" when they present the math in front of us? Wait i got it, this is what hes saying:
"Swarm launcher wrecks vehicals. Now swarm launcher shoots faster. You can not assume swarm launcher will wreck vehicals faster because it has not happened yet"
No we can not see the future... but we can do math? |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5868
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:No we can not see the future... but we can do math? I merely shared it for the lulz, you're welcome to make of it what you will :p |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
641
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 01:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hey the armour buff will also be like a nerf to ascr..I don't need to see the future to know that..its like saying by me eating more and more everyday I can't say that ill gain weight cuz I can't see the future, bodybuilders don't see the future they use math and that's what gets results |
|
Asirius Medaius
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
279
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:00:00 -
[11] - Quote
I feel sorry for Tanks (since my alt is a tanker), but when 1.4 comes around, I see dropships being completely useless until 1.5. Seems like we are going to be seeing a "Dark Era" for dropship pilots soon, since we all know the time between 1.4 and 1.5 is looking close to a month at the least... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Hey the armour buff will also be like a nerf to ascr..I don't need to see the future to know that..its like saying by me eating more and more everyday I can't say that ill gain weight cuz I can't see the future, bodybuilders don't see the future they use math and that's what gets results
This is why the vehical dev, CCP Blam got fired. He couldent see the future of his actions x) |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
219
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it. but.... how can he say "we dont know how it will go, you cant tell the future" when they present the math in front of us? Wait i got it, this is what hes saying: "Swarm launcher wrecks vehicals. Now swarm launcher shoots faster. You can not assume swarm launcher will wreck vehicals faster because it has not happened yet" No we can not see the future... but we can do math? This is a 9th grade math level question. What is so hard about it? CCP is blowing smoke when they say that they are play their own game extensively. You have ZERO time to prevent your tank from being blown apart in those 3.8 seconds. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO CUT IT!!! All I can do is shake my head and wonder who makes these decisions. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Asirius Medaius wrote:I feel sorry for Tanks (since my alt is a tanker), but when 1.4 comes around, I see dropships being completely useless until 1.5. Seems like we are going to be seeing a "Dark Era" for dropship pilots soon, since we all know the time between 1.4 and 1.5 is looking close to a month at the least...
Were all f*cked, CCP has lost it. To think i made a post yesterday of how i thought their making progress and how pleased we are with the update of 1.4... so disapointing |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it. but.... how can he say "we dont know how it will go, you cant tell the future" when they present the math in front of us? Wait i got it, this is what hes saying: "Swarm launcher wrecks vehicals. Now swarm launcher shoots faster. You can not assume swarm launcher will wreck vehicals faster because it has not happened yet" No we can not see the future... but we can do math? This is a 9th grade math level question. What is so hard about it? CCP is blowing smoke when they say that they are play their own game extensively. You have ZERO time to prevent your tank from being blown apart in those 3.8 seconds. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO CUT IT!!! All I can do is shake my head and wonder who makes these decisions.
are you smarter than a 5th grader? CCPs vehical improvements is making me dumber |
Canari Elphus
Pro Hic Immortalis League of Infamy
346
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
As a Proto swarm user I was happy the way they were. They are OP versus tanks but UP versus LLavs. Swarms shouldn't have been changed until 1.5 |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
219
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote: are you smarter than a 5th grader? CCPs vehical improvements is making me dumber
Nope. I dumb tank driver. all kidding aside possibly, but one thing is for sure. Blam and wolfman are not. They have the listening skills of a 5th grader, but they are no better at math or logic than a kid. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:15:00 -
[18] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote: are you smarter than a 5th grader? CCPs vehical improvements is making me dumber
Nope. I dumb tank driver. all kidding aside possibly, but one thing is for sure. Blam and wolfman are not. They have the listening skills of a 5th grader, but they are no better at math or logic than a kid.
hahah i reallyy dont wanna agree with you. Like, i reaaaallyyy dont wanna but i have no choice, im sorry wolfman but this was a mistake. Listen to us nao |
KenKaniff69
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
219
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:20:00 -
[19] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote: are you smarter than a 5th grader? CCPs vehical improvements is making me dumber
Nope. I dumb tank driver. all kidding aside possibly, but one thing is for sure. Blam and wolfman are not. They have the listening skills of a 5th grader, but they are no better at math or logic than a kid. hahah i reallyy dont wanna agree with you. Like, i reaaaallyyy dont wanna but i have no choice, im sorry wolfman but please dont make these same mistakes Blam did, this is terrorable just listen to us the thread is up there in the link and theres plenty of other stuff here on the fourms, just do the right thing and take our advice. We dont know how to code or make artword, design or whatever but we do play the game and we know whats balanced. We dident call for that buff anywere, we called for the exact oppisite so listen to us. Patience is about gone with this slip up His job is easy when you think about it as far as balancing goes. Just like in the real world where competition produces the best ideas and products, the forum battleground where a case is proven through hard stats and math over opinion and feelings. We have butted heads for too long. All he needs to do is take the information we have settled on and start developing the content or adjusting it accordingly. I thought ccp was all about player made content for players? We have done all the legwork. Now you do your dev part and the vehicle game will come alive again. |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
552
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:22:00 -
[20] - Quote
Proto Vehicles in 1.5/6
Everybody chill the *** out. |
|
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
582
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:Proto Vehicles in 1.5/6
Everybody chill the *** out.
Really, pigs have functional wings where you live? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
907
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Rynoceros wrote:Proto Vehicles in 1.5/6
Everybody chill the *** out. Really, pigs have functional wings where you live? yeah were not getting any proto nuthen for 1.5 or any time soon. There was no mention of new content, just rebalancing what we have |
Blaze Ashra
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:40:00 -
[23] - Quote
I guess we should count ourselves lucky they forgot AV grenades? |
Heathen Bastard
The Bastard Brigade
584
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:43:00 -
[24] - Quote
Blaze Ashra wrote:I guess we should count ourselves lucky they forgot AV grenades?
nah, those are going to get buffed to 6000 damage and carrying 5 at STD. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
641
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:Blaze Ashra wrote:I guess we should count ourselves lucky they forgot AV grenades? nah, those are going to get buffed to 6000 damage and carrying 5 at STD. Lets not forget the blast radius is now the entire map |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
553
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 02:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
You guys don't think that they dropped your PG (1.1?) to prepare the field for better variants?
That's been my theory all along. |
DJINN leukoplast
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1062
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:11:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP is most certainly going to buff the living crap out of vehicles in 1.5, cause not only have vehicle players been QQing for a while now, they will up their QQ to insane levels once the swarms get changed.
Tank turkeys are getting their proto tanks back in 1.5, so they will once again be an invincible force to reckon with (instead of just being mildly invincible like they are now). And aside from the plasma cannon, AV will likely get a huge nerf in 1.5, and the vehicles will be out of control OP. Heck, proto AV now is really the only effective thing against std tanks (aside from the adv forge, which is about right), we're going to need super-officer AV to replace proto to deal with the proto tank scrubs that will come out of 1.5
Ugh, wish they could have kept proto tanks out for good, as it is still unbalanced in favor of the tanks now, even with our proto AV. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
909
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:15:00 -
[28] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:CCP is most certainly going to buff the living crap out of vehicles in 1.5, cause not only have vehicle players been QQing for a while now, they will up their QQ to insane levels once the swarms get changed.
Tank turkeys are getting their proto tanks back in 1.5, so they will once again be an invincible force to reckon with (instead of just being mildly invincible like they are now). And aside from the plasma cannon, AV will likely get a huge nerf in 1.5, and the vehicles will be out of control OP. Heck, proto AV now is really the only effective thing against std tanks (aside from the adv forge, which is about right), we're going to need super-officer AV to replace proto to deal with the proto tank scrubs that will come out of 1.5
Ugh, wish they could have kept proto tanks out for good, as it is still unbalanced in favor of the tanks now, even with our proto AV. wholly shietf*ck. Ive NEVER seen more lies and incompetence in my entire life |
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:CCP is most certainly going to buff the living crap out of vehicles in 1.5, cause not only have vehicle players been QQing for a while now, they will up their QQ to insane levels once the swarms get changed.
Tank turkeys are getting their proto tanks back in 1.5, so they will once again be an invincible force to reckon with (instead of just being mildly invincible like they are now). And aside from the plasma cannon, AV will likely get a huge nerf in 1.5, and the vehicles will be out of control OP. Heck, proto AV now is really the only effective thing against std tanks (aside from the adv forge, which is about right), we're going to need super-officer AV to replace proto to deal with the proto tank scrubs that will come out of 1.5
Ugh, wish they could have kept proto tanks out for good, as it is still unbalanced in favor of the tanks now, even with our proto AV. This would mean that CCP makes logical decision. They have a monkey that throws knifes at wall with random numbers on it. And where the knife hits will be the new "balance for weapons etc.". This time the monkey decided that the volley intervall is beeing lowered from 2 secs down to 0.3. I have to say thats the most logical thing ever happend. And people wondered why certain people gave up with vehicles all together. |
Skihids
Bullet Cluster
1947
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:25:00 -
[30] - Quote
Asirius Medaius wrote:I feel sorry for Tanks (since my alt is a tanker), but when 1.4 comes around, I see dropships being completely useless until 1.5. Seems like we are going to be seeing a "Dark Era" for dropship pilots soon, since we all know the time between 1.4 and 1.5 is looking close to a month at the least...
It's been downhill for dropships ever since Precursor when they were at their finest.
I could just fly them for an entire match for the sheer joy of it, but now the handling is so unresponsive that I feel that I'm flying an old bus rather than a nimble attack craft. They've gotten progressively more fragile to boot.
A few glaring mistakes like that hard flight ceiling have been discarded, but the overall trajectory has been downward.
We need to roll back most of it to Precursor and then add AV counter measures and WPs for realistic missions. |
|
Asirius Medaius
Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore
283
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Asirius Medaius wrote:I feel sorry for Tanks (since my alt is a tanker), but when 1.4 comes around, I see dropships being completely useless until 1.5. Seems like we are going to be seeing a "Dark Era" for dropship pilots soon, since we all know the time between 1.4 and 1.5 is looking close to a month at the least... Were all f*cked, CCP has lost it. To think i made a post yesterday of how i thought their making progress and how pleased we are with the update of 1.4... so disapointing
Likewise; In the blog where they talked about some things we are going to see in the future, I immediately posted to CCP in excitement that I felt like I should "bite my tongue" since I underestimated them. Seems now, I estimated them correctly (since this next patch looked fun, but brought more problems to the table, with no additional content). I wish I could've bit my tongue when I said "I wished I could've bit my tongue" initially. |
Ninjanomyx
TeamPlayers EoN.
271
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:45:00 -
[32] - Quote
Asirius Medaius wrote:I feel sorry for Tanks (since my alt is a tanker), but when 1.4 comes around, I see dropships being completely useless until 1.5. Seems like we are going to be seeing a "Dark Era" for dropship pilots soon, since we all know the time between 1.4 and 1.5 is looking close to a month at the least...
You mean.....nearly 2 Months??? The stated 1-Month Cycle has proven to be a 1.5-2 Month Cycle. |
Lorhak Gannarsein
DUST University Ivy League
206
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
DJINN leukoplast wrote:CCP is most certainly going to buff the living crap out of vehicles in 1.5, cause not only have vehicle players been QQing for a while now, they will up their QQ to insane levels once the swarms get changed.
Tank turkeys are getting their proto tanks back in 1.5, so they will once again be an invincible force to reckon with (instead of just being mildly invincible like they are now). And aside from the plasma cannon, AV will likely get a huge nerf in 1.5, and the vehicles will be out of control OP. Heck, proto AV now is really the only effective thing against std tanks (aside from the adv forge, which is about right), we're going to need super-officer AV to replace proto to deal with the proto tank scrubs that will come out of 1.5
Ugh, wish they could have kept proto tanks out for good, as it is still unbalanced in favor of the tanks now, even with our proto AV.
Yep, cos all the tanker QQ has accomplished so much in the past. I mean, clearly, the more we whine the more OP we become!
We complain about how sh*tty our role is becoming, and CCP doubles swarm launcher DPS. |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
409
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason.
lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random."
And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine.
Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms.
Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
916
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 03:58:00 -
[35] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random." And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine. Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms. Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way.
LOLOLOL you and the devs are just alike
Exmaple Core wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it. but.... how can he say "we dont know how it will go, you cant tell the future" when they present the math in front of us? Wait i got it, this is what hes saying: "Swarm launcher wrecks vehicals. Now swarm launcher shoots faster. You can not assume swarm launcher will wreck vehicals faster because it has not happened yet" No we can not see the future... but we can do math? Theyve already done math in their dev blog *Swarm Launcher base lock-on time has been increased to 1.4 from 1.2 and its fire interval has been reduced from 2 to 0.3 *The Swarm Launcher Operation skill bonus has been changed from increasing the clip size to reducing the lock-on time by 5% "The proto swarm lock on time is 1.4 now but is buffing to 1.05. Fire interval is 2 seconds but is buffing to .3. How do youknow thats a buff? it dident happen yet... what are you, a future teller or somethen?"
Duh? yeah yeah yeah we get it all tank drivers suck and dont know how to pilot so you need to tell us how to do it even tho your not speced into tanks yeah we get it at this point yep. We know what were talking about, you dont |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
513
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:01:00 -
[36] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:CCP Cmdr Wang wrote:How are you going to give us meaningful feedback before you even try the changes? Or is your brain so awesome that you can look into the future? And while we are on the subject of feedback, guys, a few one liners and a catch word here and there really doesn't help. If you really care about improving the game, then please structure your feedback in a way that will:
1. List specific issues and the circumstance when it happened. We then put these in a weekly report and discuss them with the dev team on ways to address this.
2. Provide insight on why you think this is happening, if you can. Translation, explain as best as you can on how to reproduce the error/bug you encountered.
The patch notes are there to let players know what changes are coming so they can plan their gameplay accordingly, not so that people can theory craft before hand on how things will work before they actually try it. but.... how can he say "we dont know how it will go, you cant tell the future" when they present the math in front of us? Wait i got it, this is what hes saying: "Swarm launcher wrecks vehicals. Now swarm launcher shoots faster. You can not assume swarm launcher will wreck vehicals faster because it has not happened yet" No we can not see the future... but we can do math? This is a 9th grade math level question. What is so hard about it? CCP is blowing smoke when they say that they are play their own game extensively. You have ZERO time to prevent your tank from being blown apart in those 3.8 seconds. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO CUT IT!!! All I can do is shake my head and wonder who makes these decisions.
More like 6th grade. |
Telleth
DUST University Ivy League
118
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
While this does sound like I'm definitely not going to be pulling my vehicles out for the next month, which really sucks for the 8mil sp i have in vehicles, but there are some lights at the end of the tunnel.
First, with the changes to squad/team vision, I foresee vehicles not sticking out and drawing fire as bad as they currently do.
Then future thinking, AV countermeasures, vehicles with signature radii that affect how long a swarm launcher takes to lock on, and modules/skills to modify as needed.
Now how are they going to buff forge/AV nades so that we can get countermeasures to those...? |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
513
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random." And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine. Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms. Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way.
Be quiet. You're not a pilot, so you don't understand. I hardly ever see a decent pilot acting like a idiot. More like, fleeing, and still dies, while going from cover to cover for a full 30 seconds or so. |
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
513
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:05:00 -
[39] - Quote
Telleth wrote:While this does sound like I'm definitely not going to be pulling my vehicles out for the next month, which really sucks for the 8mil sp i have in vehicles, but there are some lights at the end of the tunnel.
First, with the changes to squad/team vision, I foresee vehicles not sticking out and drawing fire as bad as they currently do.
Then future thinking, AV countermeasures, vehicles with signature radii that affect how long a swarm launcher takes to lock on, and modules/skills to modify as needed.
Now how are they going to buff forge/AV nades so that we can get countermeasures to those...?
They need to change AV nades into stasis grenades with a very low (I'm talking like 50 damage) that can slow down vehicles. As far as Forges, I don't even know..... |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
916
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:05:00 -
[40] - Quote
Telleth wrote:While this does sound like I'm definitely not going to be pulling my vehicles out for the next month, which really sucks for the 8mil sp i have in vehicles, but there are some lights at the end of the tunnel.
First, with the changes to squad/team vision, I foresee vehicles not sticking out and drawing fire as bad as they currently do.
Then future thinking, AV countermeasures, vehicles with signature radii that affect how long a swarm launcher takes to lock on, and modules/skills to modify as needed.
Now how are they going to buff forge/AV nades so that we can get countermeasures to those...?
interesting point, i like the part were the entire enemy team no longer sees your tank whenever a single enemy aims at it, but those countermeasures are 2-5 months away |
|
Silas Swakhammer
GamersForChrist Orion Empire
73
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Well, this thread has been enlightening. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
917
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:23:00 -
[42] - Quote
Silas Swakhammer wrote:Well, this thread has been enlightening. cant tell if serious |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
988
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Exmaple Core wrote:Telleth wrote:While this does sound like I'm definitely not going to be pulling my vehicles out for the next month, which really sucks for the 8mil sp i have in vehicles, but there are some lights at the end of the tunnel.
First, with the changes to squad/team vision, I foresee vehicles not sticking out and drawing fire as bad as they currently do.
Then future thinking, AV countermeasures, vehicles with signature radii that affect how long a swarm launcher takes to lock on, and modules/skills to modify as needed.
Now how are they going to buff forge/AV nades so that we can get countermeasures to those...? interesting point, i like the part were the entire enemy team no longer sees your tank whenever a single enemy aims at it, but those countermeasures are 2-5 months away
exmaple......im dissapointed in you. out of all people you should know better than to expect those in half a year. we are too busy making swarms more balanced so those av guys have a fighting chance |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
917
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
Lurchasaurus wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Telleth wrote:While this does sound like I'm definitely not going to be pulling my vehicles out for the next month, which really sucks for the 8mil sp i have in vehicles, but there are some lights at the end of the tunnel.
First, with the changes to squad/team vision, I foresee vehicles not sticking out and drawing fire as bad as they currently do.
Then future thinking, AV countermeasures, vehicles with signature radii that affect how long a swarm launcher takes to lock on, and modules/skills to modify as needed.
Now how are they going to buff forge/AV nades so that we can get countermeasures to those...? interesting point, i like the part were the entire enemy team no longer sees your tank whenever a single enemy aims at it, but those countermeasures are 2-5 months away exmaple......im dissapointed in you. out of all people you should know better than to expect those in half a year. we are too busy making swarms more balanced so those av guys have a fighting chance
your right, i gotta lay off and cuttem some slack, theyve worked hard to earn that buff. Know how many armor tanks they had to blow up to get this on the patch? like, 7 |
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
410
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
Aizen Intiki wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random." And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine. Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms. Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way. Be quiet. You're not a pilot, so you don't understand. I hardly ever see a decent pilot acting like a idiot. More like, fleeing, and still dies, while going from cover to cover for a full 30 seconds or so. Did I or did I not agree that DS needs some kind of counter measure? |
Charlotte O'Dell
0uter.Heaven
1079
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
Wolf man = Blam 2.0 |
Eno Raef
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
68
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Why doesn't CCP just give a buff to swarm damage to LAVs and leave the damage on HAVs and drop ships the same. The over buffing of LAVs is the only reason I could find that would be cause for an AV buff. HAVs are, from my experience, weak to AV because they are so slow but LAV can easily speed beyond swarms. If they do get hit, they have near the same defense of a militia HAV so the LAV is safe. No LAV should have the capability of possessing nearly the same defense as an HAV.
If HAV's hadn't been nerfed from what they were in Chromosome, I think it would have been ok. I actually enjoyed going after HAV's with squad mates due to the satisfaction of destroying up such a powerful adversary.
CCP, you are horrible at developing Dust. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
921
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 04:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
Eno Raef wrote:Why doesn't CCP just give a buff to swarm damage to LAVs and leave the damage on HAVs and drop ships the same. The over buffing of LAVs is the only reason I could find that would be reason for an AV buff. HAVs are, from my experience, weak to AV because they are so slow but LAV can easily speed beyond swarms. If they do get his, they have near the same defense of a militia HAV. No LAV should have the capability of possessing nearly the same defense of an HAV. If HAV's hadn't been nerfed from what they were in Chromosome, I think it would have been ok. I actually enjoyed going after HAV's with squad mates due to the satisfaction of destroying up such a powerful adversary. CCP, you are horrible at developing Dust. DAAAYUMN!! mostly agree my man |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
451
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 08:25:00 -
[49] - Quote
Nemo Bluntz wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random." And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine. Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms. Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way. You're obviously playing something different. |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
927
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 15:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Nemo Bluntz wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:In 1.4, they decided lolrandomAVbuff to swarms for some reason. lol random? Tell that to the LLAV drivers that go 24-0 because swarms can't deal with them. Haha, "random." And tanks aren't just dropping left and right to swarms. Use the active modules, don't play like you should be totally invincible, and its easy to get 10+ kills without dying. Just like in almost any dropsuit. Play smart, retreat when needed, you'll be just fine. Drop ships are a whole other story. They need some kind of flare or something. But I've had them outrun swarms I've shot at them with almost no issue. Its rare to actually take a DS down with swarms. Seriously. Swarms at this point aren't that good. They have their job, buts its no "win button." This whole bitching about issues that haven't even happened yet is so silly. Especially since the forge gun will still be objectively better in every possible way. You're obviously playing something different.
shush, he cant do math x |
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
339
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 16:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
LOL at any and all who have faith or think that CCP knows what they are doing, pfff please. I mean come on they released a beta and got a ton of fanboys brain washed into thinking that in 10 years this is going to be a AAA FPS and a first of its kind. Again LOL at the suckers. Broke ass game is still broke ass game. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1042
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Its what the majority want because they are infantry players
If vehicles were OP is bad
But if AV is OP then its good
Once again crutch swarm users are saying HTFU and get better and use a better fit even tho we cannot improve our tanks or mods and if you drop a fully fitted tank down for these crutch users it gets blown up in a matter of seconds because tanking isnt as easy as they thought but they will defend the crutch because lol its easy
1.5 will come, i fear it wont have proto mods or hulls, i fear that really nothing good will come from it for vehiclesand that AV will prob get buffed againt because infantry>vehicles
6 sets of nerfs now in a row, more than 6 nerfs in total more like 15 i bet maybe more |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
354
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:15:00 -
[53] - Quote
Just a couple of glaring mistakes in your thread ...
First your OP claims ... "Then, intelligent ppl like this guy above puts in some very analitcal and correct input, and the only response we get from CCP so far is:" Yet the following statement was quoted in the "guy above"s post, so he was responding to the dev.
Secondly further down you state ... "No we can not see the future... but we can do math?" ... well you'll know what an incomplete equation looks like then ... look again and this time factor in the additional reloads from the reduced clip sizes ... it's easy to see "thats gonna hurt me more" without looking at the complete equation, but I guess you knew that already or you wouldn't have missed it out.
Also have you seen a patch that didn't contain anything that wasn't in the patch notes ... how do you know there's not a slight adjustment to base resists for the different vehicles, just to smooth things over till 1.5 ... have you played 1.4 yet ?
How about "yeah were not getting any proto nuthen for 1.5 or any time soon. There was no mention of new content, just rebalancing what we have" ... again have you seen Patch Notes for 1.5 ? ... has there been mention of there not being new content ? ... then don't make statements like "yeah were not getting any proto nuthen for 1.5 or any time soon." just to rally your cause, cos all it does is discredit your legitimate complaint.
Here's another one ... "interesting point, i like the part were the entire enemy team no longer sees your tank whenever a single enemy aims at it, but those countermeasures are 2-5 months away" ... here's one from the Patch Notes for you ... "Shared passive scanner vision for squads disabled (results of active scanners are still shared with squads)" ... and as to the second part, really, can you link the devblog this was stated in please ? |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Just a couple of glaring mistakes in your thread ...
First your OP claims ... "Then, intelligent ppl like this guy above puts in some very analitcal and correct input, and the only response we get from CCP so far is:" Yet the following statement was quoted in the "guy above"s post, so he was responding to the dev.
Secondly further down you state ... "No we can not see the future... but we can do math?" ... well you'll know what an incomplete equation looks like then ... look again and this time factor in the additional reloads from the reduced clip sizes ... it's easy to see "thats gonna hurt me more" without looking at the complete equation, but I guess you knew that already or you wouldn't have missed it out.
Also have you seen a patch that didn't contain anything that wasn't in the patch notes ... how do you know there's not a slight adjustment to base resists for the different vehicles, just to smooth things over till 1.5 ... have you played 1.4 yet ?
How about "yeah were not getting any proto nuthen for 1.5 or any time soon. There was no mention of new content, just rebalancing what we have" ... again have you seen Patch Notes for 1.5 ? ... has there been mention of there not being new content ? ... then don't make statements like "yeah were not getting any proto nuthen for 1.5 or any time soon." just to rally your cause, cos all it does is discredit your legitimate complaint.
Here's another one ... "interesting point, i like the part were the entire enemy team no longer sees your tank whenever a single enemy aims at it, but those countermeasures are 2-5 months away" ... here's one from the Patch Notes for you ... "Shared passive scanner vision for squads disabled (results of active scanners are still shared with squads)" ... and as to the second part, really, can you link the devblog this was stated in please ?
dont try to metagame argue with me. Its not in the patchnotes, its not going to be there, changes are made in plain text. In 1.2 they said their doing rebalancing to vehicals in 1.5, that does not mean new content, its balancing what we have now. Theyve also stated in 1.1 that they are focusing on improving the game and fixing it over giving us new content. Heres some math forya, add 2 puzzle peices together, it usally equals four. If im missing any parts of the equation right the whole thing out, dont just talk about it |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
354
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
Do your own research ... I'm not the one making all the threads complaining about a buff to AV, but then only including the 'relevant' numbers ... I've merely pointed out that you haven't factored in the additional reload times from having reduced ammo in the clip.
"Its not in the patchnotes, its not going to be there" - If you say so ... I've been here through plenty of builds and there hasn't been one that didn't have stuff in that wasn't in the patch notes.
Rebalancing to vehicles does not mean new content no, but it does not exclude it ... ohh and by the way the Sagaris and Surya are NOT new content ! |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
354
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:55:00 -
[56] - Quote
Fact of the matter is with an increased rate of fire, Swarmers won't be FORCED to stack damage mods in order to 'get the kill before the getaway' ... Yes it's given swarms the option of a slightly higher overall dps, but it's also opened up the option to have a slightly higher tanked fitting with equivalent dps to what we have now, or even the option of a shield tanked AV fit, which just isn't a valid choice right now. So shall we just call it a nerf to assault rifles and be done with it !? |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
215
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 17:58:00 -
[57] - Quote
HTFU |
Taeryn Frost
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 18:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 6 sets of nerfs now in a row, more than 6 nerfs in total more like 15 i bet maybe more
Well...since you put it that way, you don't want them to break such a nice streak do you?!
|
First Prophet
Valor Company Incorporated
868
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 18:32:00 -
[59] - Quote
I would like all your stuffs. |
Flix Keptick
Red Star. EoN.
44
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 18:54:00 -
[60] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:Blaze Ashra wrote:I guess we should count ourselves lucky they forgot AV grenades? nah, those are going to get buffed to 6000 damage and carrying 5 at STD. Lets not forget the blast radius is now the entire map
The entire map when you zoom out, not the small part we are confined to |
|
Soldner VonKuechle
SAM-MIK
94
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 19:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
Exmaple, are you the real example core, just in hiding?
The av "buff" has yet to even move into the first act and already everyone is hemorrhaging brain matter out their ears.
Let's just remember what happened t o LAVs in the first'balance' pass. 60% hp buff. Is it too unfathomable to imagine it WILL happen again? When it does happen, will you be happy? Or will the behemoths that are proto hulls only satisfy you? The days of the sagaris single handedly winning battles might not return entirely, but you best believe that two of them on a field will cause everyone to av, or just die repeatedly.
Is it stupid that swarms were altered seperate from vehicles? absolutey.
But there are bridges we need to burn when we get there, not nuke em from orbit and wonder why we can't cross the river.
And you can use math all you want to prove any theory, because math, like men, can be manipulated to spew forth whatever data you want it to. Thanks statistics! There are more variables to account for than we even know of yet.
And it sucks, because I was just beginning to learn the current state if tanking.... that schtuff is tricky. |
Purona
The Vanguardians
45
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 19:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:You guys don't think that they dropped your PG (1.1?) to prepare the field for better variants?
That's been my theory all along. they dropped power grid in 1.1 thats why they randomly gave the madrugar an extra low slot which is mandatory to get the same modules on as pre 1.1
so people would actually use powergrid modules |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |