Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1943
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 04:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are. |
N1ck Comeau
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
1055
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless. |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1945
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless. But you can not nerf AV until you nerf LLAV's.
Regardless, one person should be able to destroy a tank, because it takes only one person to use them. |
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
234
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
I LOL my pants off at all of the failhards who say an LLAV is more durable then a tank.
-GARBAGE-
My repair tool, my passive/active resistance modules, and my knowledge of the maps makes me one elusive beasts.
You should also see how my tank hugs LLAVs. I am Snuggles the Bear and I am about to soften that FABRIC!!!
Enough though. LLAV's are easy to pop, just hard to solo, as a vehicle should be ESPECIALLY when its intended purpose is to stop and repair shields and armor. It is sad that people think that they should be easy to destroy especially when even the lower tier ones cost more than a single proto suit.
I CAN agree on scaling damage to suits based on speed, with the lowest speeds pushing people aside. I CAN agree on vehicles taking a percentage of damage based on the type of suit hit, to force thought to engage.
I DON'T agree with nerfing resistance or shields. I DON'T agree with nerfing speed/maneuverability.
Also, CCP should allow for more WPs for Logistic Vehicle roles, such as MCRU spawn ins, assists gained from scans, points for repairing armor and shields, and more!
Its severely lacking.
*note* Seeing as most people INSTANTLY assume that any form of reasonable discussion about LLAVs means you are a dirty murder taxi user, I can refer you to Espeon or LordChaos who can tell you I am a tank operator and a dropship users. Flying the ADS is like painting a masterpiece, and I am Michaelangelo, potential Aspbergers and everything. |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1946
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:I LOL my pants off at all of the failhards who say an LLAV is more durable then a tank.
-GARBAGE-
My repair tool, my passive/active resistance modules, and my knowledge of the maps makes me one elusive beasts.
You should also see how my tank hugs LLAVs. I am Snuggles the Bear and I am about to soften that FABRIC!!!
Enough though. LLAV's are easy to pop, just hard to solo, as a vehicle should be ESPECIALLY when its intended purpose is to stop and repair shields and armor. It is sad that people think that they should be easy to destroy especially when even the lower tier ones cost more than a single proto suit.
I CAN agree on scaling damage to suits based on speed, with the lowest speeds pushing people aside. I CAN agree on vehicles taking a percentage of damage based on the type of suit hit, to force thought to engage.
I DON'T agree with nerfing resistance or shields. I DON'T agree with nerfing speed/maneuverability.
Also, CCP should allow for more WPs for Logistic Vehicle roles, such as MCRU spawn ins, assists gained from scans, points for repairing armor and shields, and more!
Its severely lacking.
*note* Seeing as most people INSTANTLY assume that any form of reasonable discussion about LLAVs means you are a dirty murder taxi user, I can refer you to Espeon or LordChaos who can tell you I am a tank operator and a dropship users. Flying the ADS is like painting a masterpiece, and I am Michaelangelo, potential Aspbergers and everything. Aw Man! Why did my thread have to get Mary'd? :/ |
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
234
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cause I am a vehicle operator and know my business dawg.
Kinda makes me sad how many people 'don't get it'.
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
809
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
I don't usually run into more than one LLAV and their I find that RE works in taking em out. NOW THAT IS A BULL AND MATADOR SCENERIO. Sometimes I win, and sometimes I misjudge the distance.
As for tanks? LOL I've never shied away from letting everyone one know where I was on the field. Still don't. I use to haunt objectives. Now I do BOTH.
*Both. Like two places at same time!*
They know what it means. The other place I haunt is the enemys RED LINE. You won't have to go far to find me. If you find me.
*I'm sure the tattle tale of a tank guard you kill first will cry out your position..*
Maybe, but by that time, the tank has two choices. RECALL or LOSE IT. |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1947
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Double Mary'd...
Today is not my day :( |
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
810
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 05:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Double Mary'd...
Today is not my day :(
Drop the price in for HAV and DS. And that should fix a lot of the QQ going on. people act like they never played any other vehicle FPS before. They are killing machines their too, but just are easily swatted down by two dedicated players and in some cases one dedicated player. But many don't whine about it, cause it costs them nothing. So lowering the price should ease that pain a bit. |
Xender17
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
478
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are. If its swarms people are specing into then its to a higher degree on HAVs |
|
Kas Croixe
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
81
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mary! Yeah, seeing your tank on the field is a real headache for me, or the sign of an easy win should we be on the same side. I'm not specced into regular grade AV, so I can only act as heavy deterrent with militia swarms and knowledge of how to use them(Used to be dedicated AV in chrome). and yes, my murder-taxi does have better survivability than any of my tanks, know why? MOBILITY. a tank has an extremely hard time dodging swarms, or getting from a decent firing angle to cover, based almost entirely on the fact that CCP basically hamstringed the things since chrome. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1198
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Double Mary'd...
Today is not my day :( Drop the price in for HAV and DS. And that should fix a lot of the QQ going on. people act like they never played any other vehicle FPS before. They are killing machines their too, but just are easily swatted down by two dedicated players and in some cases one dedicated player. But many don't whine about it, cause it costs them nothing. So lowering the price should ease that pain a bit. either the worth of tank need to go up to match its cost(buffing them) or the price needs to go down to its' worth.(reduce cost) |
Rusty Shallows
Black Jackals
275
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Xender17 wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are. If its swarms people are specing into then its to a higher degree on HAVs Same for Forge Guns. I had to give up the Adv Assault FGs when it became clear more and more HAVs were comfortably tanking the fire. Although there were some regular LAVs that were still after two shots as well. |
broonfondle majikthies
P.O.N.A.G.S. D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
175
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:34:00 -
[14] - Quote
As an ambulance driver and not a murder taxi I can say the durability needs to stay the same. Doing the job properly means being in the path of some heavy ordinance. I agree there needs to be more incentive to fulfil its intended role (though I get mail from tankers who can't believe how survivable they become with my help it doesn't fill my coffers, so I only pull it out for my squad)
P.S the troop repper is a joke, the best I can do is tag someone while they hack.. then I get shot -_- |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 06:49:00 -
[15] - Quote
Because tanks were made useless, and vehicle users looked for something that they could put their SP to use. And then, we apparently had "murder taxi problem."
Assaults were the cause of it. |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
526
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 07:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
|
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
240
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 09:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
No tank tears here, only the tears of the AV-users I mangle.
PRO-TIP
Scanners on vehicles are pretty beast. 100 meters every direction with super fast CD on it. AV-naders will have a tough time getting you with those on. |
pegasis prime
BIG BAD W0LVES Eternal Syndicate
654
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 09:45:00 -
[18] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless.
Dont be mad at the swarner be mad at ccp for bot giving us proto havs. Although that being said I have more respect for mercs who team up and down my hav with std or adv av weponary as it is supposed to be a team effort to tackle a fully specked hav with 2 gunners . Proto av against std havs is a win button plain and simple . Folks who solo std havs with proto av dont want to play as part of a team but only want a win I.e. dead tank with no effort. |
The Robot Devil
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
854
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 09:47:00 -
[19] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless.
If they can shoot you then a sniper should be able to hit them. Get a good sniper. |
Anmol Singh
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
238
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 10:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are.
Tanks are the victim now... |
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Beyond Hypothetical Box
144
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 11:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are. ..and proto AV push HAV pilot to red zone. Now I kill 90% of Bolas, 100% enemy HAV, DS, and 50% of LAV(all kind). I had to skill up all my vehicle skills to lvl5. Now Infantry that is 2-shoot-killed pay the price.
I move to redline because I HAVE TO, i just HAVE TO...
/sarcasm off |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
955
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 12:03:00 -
[22] - Quote
I hate idiots
CCP removed skills from the vehicle tree and added them to all vehicles so all LAVs got a buff and the ppl who benefited were the tryhard AR users
Tryhard AR users can easily use a LLAV with next to no skills and do fine, for the vehicle users we are even harder to kill because we specced into the vehicle tree and know how to fit stuff up and what to do
That said the LLAVgets no WP for actually being a logi and tbh it sorta does suck at being logi in general, my spider maddy is generally better than it
|
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:30:00 -
[23] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec LOL So you expected to solo a LAV with militia swarms. Why am I not surprised.
Full passive skills and modules give you damn near 60% resistance. Plus, it's a shield vehicle, and explosive weaponry doesn't get the damage bonus against shields. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless. I laughed like a maniac when I saw a full squad trying to destroy my Gunnlogi with MLT/STD swarms, and one ADV swarm.
They weren't able to take it out because one of those guys was barely doing any damage to it by himself. And, they were waiting for me to get out of the redline so they could continue to hammer me. So I stayed in the redline most of the time, and rendered a squad unavailable/next to useless by sitting in the redline.
Gotta love idiots. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:34:00 -
[25] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless. But you can not nerf AV until you nerf LLAV's. Regardless, one person should be able to destroy a tank, because it takes only one person to use them. LOLgic |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:36:00 -
[26] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:I don't usually run into more than one LLAV and their I find that RE works in taking em out. NOW THAT IS A BULL AND MATADOR SCENERIO. Sometimes I win, and sometimes I misjudge the distance.
As for tanks? LOL I've never shied away from letting everyone one know where I was on the field. Still don't. I use to haunt objectives. Now I do BOTH.
*Both. Like two places at same time!*
They know what it means. The other place I haunt is the enemys RED LINE. You won't have to go far to find me. If you find me.
*I'm sure the tattle tale of a tank guard you kill first will cry out your position..*
Maybe, but by that time, the tank has two choices. RECALL or LOSE IT. Because of crutch homing AV? |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
broonfondle majikthies wrote:As an ambulance driver and not a murder taxi I can say the durability needs to stay the same. Doing the job properly means being in the path of some heavy ordinance. I agree there needs to be more incentive to fulfil its intended role (though I get mail from tankers who can't believe how survivable they become with my help it doesn't fill my coffers, so I only pull it out for my squad)
P.S the troop repper is a joke, the best I can do is tag someone while they hack.. then I get shot -_- And there's some of us that don't want you getting in our way. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
427
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 15:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
LOL Cry elsewhere |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
527
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Rynoceros wrote:HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
LOL Cry elsewhere
You're joking right? You either redline your kill-padder or you get on the forums and complain about how mistreated you and all of your little pilot buddies are. Then boast about your awesomeness. STFU already. Eat a greasy bag of *****.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
964
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 16:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Rynoceros wrote:HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
LOL Cry elsewhere You're joking right? You either redline your kill-padder or you get on the forums and complain about how mistreated you and all of your little pilot buddies are. Then boast about your awesomeness. STFU already. Eat a greasy bag of *****.
QQ
Infantry like you wanted vehicles nerfed and it happened and now you do have to deal with redline tanks because you put them up ther
Cause and effect |
|
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
528
|
Posted - 2013.08.21 18:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Rynoceros wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Rynoceros wrote:HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
LOL Cry elsewhere You're joking right? You either redline your kill-padder or you get on the forums and complain about how mistreated you and all of your little pilot buddies are. Then boast about your awesomeness. STFU already. Eat a greasy bag of *****. QQ Infantry like you wanted vehicles nerfed and it happened and now you do have to deal with redline tanks because you put them up ther Cause and effect
I liked where tanks were in Chromosome. Probably could've even used resistance buffs. The problem is CCP. Not infantry. They ruined it. Not AV grenades (that everybody was fine with 4 months ago), not lolswarms (again, fine until Uprising), not even Forge Guns were a problem. You guys got ******. No doubt in that. But we get it already. I'm assuming that CCP has as well by now. My shotguns got ruined, too. Do I see 500 threads about it everyday? Or irrational spam threads about nerfing everything else? No. We specced into other **** weapons and moved on or quit the game.
You guys run to the redline because your frontline tactics suck. This mentality of thinking gunners are useless and LLAV running reps as an annoyance is just like going into a squad of reds running solo infantry, no matter your experience level - you have prepared for failure by not utilizing all of the tools available to you.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
975
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 11:59:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Rynoceros wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Rynoceros wrote:HAVs are overpriced and should have their upper tier variants available. Then again, they shouldn't be able to parallel park the mother ******* on top of every single objective in the game. Same with LAVs. Every gap on the terrain and installations is conveniently just wide enough to cruise through.
**** them.
Blast on, Aztec. I just picked up a Proto 'Tankcry' Duvolle Tactical Tear Bucket on the market that I'm itching to use.
LOL Cry elsewhere You're joking right? You either redline your kill-padder or you get on the forums and complain about how mistreated you and all of your little pilot buddies are. Then boast about your awesomeness. STFU already. Eat a greasy bag of *****. QQ Infantry like you wanted vehicles nerfed and it happened and now you do have to deal with redline tanks because you put them up ther Cause and effect I liked where tanks were in Chromosome. Probably could've even used resistance buffs. The problem is CCP. Not infantry. They ruined it. Not AV grenades (that everybody was fine with 4 months ago), not lolswarms (again, fine until Uprising), not even Forge Guns were a problem. You guys got ******. No doubt in that. But we get it already. I'm assuming that CCP has as well by now. My shotguns got ruined, too. Do I see 500 threads about it everyday? Or irrational spam threads about nerfing everything else? No. We specced into other **** weapons and moved on or quit the game. You guys run to the redline because your frontline tactics suck. This mentality of thinking gunners are useless and LLAV running reps as an annoyance is just like going into a squad of reds running solo infantry, no matter your experience level - you have prepared for failure by not utilizing all of the tools available to you.
Top joke
Frontline tactics, avoid getting blown up thats the only tactic
In a pub match it doesnt matter, most gunners are useless and try to use the gun to kill some when its easier to get out and kill him but they wont, or they fire at the MCC like idiots, how can i sneak up on a tank or the compound with some ****** in my turrets?
I run in a group, i run with other tankers and other players, proto swarms say hello but dont know where from because lolrendering
LLAV is kinda **** as a spider tank, i have several madrugar fits which surpass it but if the target hits me im less likely to blow up
This is all well and good in a pub match you try this **** in PC and you wil get ****** up anyways
In PC you dont have gunners but you face against proto AV all the time, FG on roofs are popular and even more popular are the assault tryhards with proto AV nades which can spam all 3 of them by the time they are killed doing over 6k damage to your tank
It rare you get a tank v tank without 1 side having AV hitting someone and it doesnt matter, you just bring out another tank and if you die he dies next due to you or AV
Give us proto in PC and it could become a diff story, you may need 2-3 guys with proto AV weapons and not lolnades and the best tank counter would be a tank |
Purona
The Vanguardians
45
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 12:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote: You guys run to the redline because your frontline tactics suck. This mentality of thinking gunners are useless and LLAV running reps as an annoyance is just like going into a squad of reds running solo infantry, no matter your experience level - you have prepared for failure by not utilizing all of the tools available to you.
most tankers go into the redline because its the safest place to be while also being able to be offensive being on the frontline you have to be aware of everyhing
infantry with AV nades Lavs driving around Swarms and forge guns Rail gun tanks
And any one or combination of these can appear at any one time
|
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
184
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 12:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
you again? just adapt already |
CommanderBolt
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S.
196
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 12:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:I LOL my pants off at all of the failhards who say an LLAV is more durable then a tank.
-GARBAGE-
My repair tool, my passive/active resistance modules, and my knowledge of the maps makes me one elusive beasts.
You should also see how my tank hugs LLAVs. I am Snuggles the Bear and I am about to soften that FABRIC!!!
Enough though. LLAV's are easy to pop, just hard to solo, as a vehicle should be ESPECIALLY when its intended purpose is to stop and repair shields and armor. It is sad that people think that they should be easy to destroy especially when even the lower tier ones cost more than a single proto suit.
I CAN agree on scaling damage to suits based on speed, with the lowest speeds pushing people aside. I CAN agree on vehicles taking a percentage of damage based on the type of suit hit, to force thought to engage.
I DON'T agree with nerfing resistance or shields. I DON'T agree with nerfing speed/maneuverability.
Also, CCP should allow for more WPs for Logistic Vehicle roles, such as MCRU spawn ins, assists gained from scans, points for repairing armor and shields, and more!
Its severely lacking.
*note* Seeing as most people INSTANTLY assume that any form of reasonable discussion about LLAVs means you are a dirty murder taxi user, I can refer you to Espeon or LordChaos who can tell you I am a tank operator and a dropship users. Flying the ADS is like painting a masterpiece, and I am Michaelangelo, potential Aspbergers and everything.
In total agreement. To do the actual job role they are intended to do they need to keep their speed and resistance. I find the collision damage is the problem. If it wasn't so damn easy to hit people and insta-kill them even at low speeds there would not be such a problem. |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1961
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 13:56:00 -
[36] - Quote
THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:you again? just adapt already I did adapt home boy; 12% proficiency and 3x complex damage mods.
...
I have never seen an LLAV run away until did that. |
Justin Tymes
Dem Durrty Boyz
341
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 14:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
Horrible because the game should be build around standard gear, but 3 of my proto packed AV nades can barely take down the shields to 50% so it's not make much of a difference, by then I'm getting ran over, and my proto Proxy Mines are garbage so you can't even prep against them. |
Medical Crash
Vacuum Cleaner. LLC RUST415
116
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 14:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I know that is the main reason I did it. I remember shooting at a Charybdis with militia swarms after the last respec and thinking that is was just a glitch that had made the swarms not register. Then I learned that they were more durable than any HAV you will ever see on the battlefield. Not only that but they go lightning fast and insta-kill you with a 3mph love tap from their bumpers.
Now I am not new to AV. I was dedicated AV back in Chromosome. Though, that meant a different thing back then. My job then was to keep LAV's away from objectives. Keep dropships from hovering over points and keeping HAV's away from infantry. Though, I never saw a reason to go past standard swarms. Reason was, I didn't need to destroy every vehicle on the enemy team, I just needed to hit them and make them run for the hills. To deter them. This is not the case in Uprising. People kept coming at you with free militia LAV's, even if they just had 1 armor left, they still came at you. LLAV's are worse. You can't even dent them with standard. That's why I HAD TO get proto Swarms, I had to destroy them as fast as possible. Why? Because I knew, know, that it is either me or them. They don't get scared the way they uses to in Chromosome, they won't stop till there dead... That's where I come in.
Who suffers from all this? Dropships and to a lower degree low tier HAV's. Unfortunately for them, AV will remain balanced as long as LLAV's remain the death machines they are. Same here, I come to find out it was pointless though. You would not believe how much resistance LLAVs have..... The most effective way is to kill the driver, Blasters bypass the vehicles health and go straight for the Driver. |
Justicar Karnellia
Ikomari-Onu Enforcement Caldari State
81
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 14:21:00 -
[39] - Quote
Someone correct me, but haven't they been like this for 3 patch cycles now? Wasn't it in uprising 1.0 that they gave a blanket +70% hit point increased to LAV's (I still don't understand why this number was picked, but maybe they had access to metrics that we didn't).
The most frustrating thing for me is on the LLAV it is clearly poorly implemented, so much so that they are near indestructible for us (im)mortals that don't carry anything under proto AV equipment, and even then they are really difficult to destroy. The Tac AR's lasted I think 2 patch cycles before they were corrected, and the flaylocks about the same (again, please correct if I'm inaccurate).
I hope they aren't waiting until 1.5 to fix these anomalies... there are so many of them now and they are really a drag on some maps, nigh on indestructible and the drivers know it. They rack up some great kill scores too (I saw a 23/0 once).
I'll remain optimistic for the 1.4 patch notes to see if it changes something.
|
Cy Clone1
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
215
|
Posted - 2013.08.22 14:53:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:Cause I am a vehicle operator and know my business canine symbol that also doubles as a term of endearment.
Kinda makes me sad how many people 'don't get it'.
when your armor tanks get there reps fixed, come back and tell us how durable your tanks are. When that day comes you will no longer be able to rep through any know tank buster In the game. good day |
|
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
247
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 04:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
I think the best think is fix the text right now to properly show where there repairs are at now.
No need to bring the reps in line with the text.
The reps where they are now are what allows us to even be competitive.
I roll my eyes at the AV's who want to nerf the repairs. You guys are funny wanting to solo well built vehicles. |
KING CHECKMATE
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
615
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 04:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
N1ck Comeau wrote:It's a shame that every day more and more people get proto AV equipment but yet tanks still stay at a disadvantage.
One guy should not be able to take out a tank. I've seen it happen. Sure to weaker tanks mostly but still.
I can't get mad if i lose a tank to 6 guys.
But i believe it's totally reasonable for me to get mad at one guy that uses proto swarms and takes me out because he keeps following me and there is nothing i can do, or to that one guy sitting on a tower with a proto forge making my tank useless.
Ive seen 3 guys with proto gear shooting at the same time, Proto FG, proto swarms, the tank took them all, and hid. No vehicle should be capable of taking a breach Proto FG plus an Proto Assault FG plus Proto Swarms and SURVIVE. NO VEHICLE SHOULD.This proves that its not that you have fully UP tanks, but you are doing your fitting wrong.
I also saw an LLAV destroy a tank LOL...
AND OP is right. Before uprising i didnt have a single AV weapon.
Now i have Proto everything and play as Forge gunner or Commando with Swarms. Plus nades, plus scout with Pox Exp....EVERYTHING. If after my SP investment you deny me the ability to destroy a tank solo that a is WAY TOO close to enemy infantry, then the game would be broken. |
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc Dark Taboo
1971
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 10:06:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:I think the best think is fix the text right now to properly show where there repairs are at now.
No need to bring the reps in line with the text.
The reps where they are now are what allows us to even be competitive.
I roll my eyes at the AV's who want to nerf the repairs. You guys are funny wanting to solo well built vehicles. Mary'd for a thi... Screw that! Mary you read the patch notes? They are making it a lot harder to kill people with collision damage! Rejoice!
|
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
247
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 20:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Collision damage doesn't REALLY bug me, because I am in my tank mostly.
As for the person who said a tank hid through the barrage of three proto AV, he is one lucky SOB. Not saying it is impossible, but you guys messed up on your coordination. 3 proto AVs, properly coordinated, can take out most tanks. Just saying. Also, pics or it didn't happen.
Anyways, happy hunting. |
KING CHECKMATE
Bragian Order Amarr Empire
622
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 21:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:Collision damage doesn't REALLY bug me, because I am in my tank mostly.
As for the person who said a tank hid through the barrage of three proto AV, he is one lucky SOB. Not saying it is impossible, but you guys messed up on your coordination. 3 proto AVs, properly coordinated, can take out most tanks. Just saying. Also, pics or it didn't happen.
Anyways, happy hunting.
2 Proto Forge guns and 1 Proto swarms CAN be taken, if you are in an ARMOR tank. Yeah he barely survived but he did activate his regen stuff enough to barely survive, plus he only had like 5000+ ish armor,ive seen tanks with 8k....
I dont know whats the big surprise.....If you really dont believe a tank can survive 3 proto av simultaneously then you are delusional and need to play as infantry a little more. See how good you can do vs tanks while you ALSO have infantry shooting at you. (im talking about GOOD tanks not militia crap ok?)
I DO AGREE TANKS NEED A BUFF, this buff being a price reduction of (approximately) 1/3 . Tanks cant be buffed MORE. They already take a lot of specialization and organization to take down,and only 1 Tanker to wreak havok. If you Buff them more in any way we will end up with ALL infantry going AV or vehicles.
But a price reduction is fair since the cost of getting a good tank is a little HIGH for their actual performance.
|
Nemo Bluntz
TeamPlayers EoN.
417
|
Posted - 2013.08.24 21:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:LLAV'S made people get proto AV True. *******. Story.
Its exactly why I started getting into swarms a few weeks ago before all of this incessant bitching started up. |
Mary Sedillo
Pure Innocence. EoN.
249
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 19:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
I am not saying it can't be done, and I AM an armor tanker that is hella hard to take on with just one proto AV, but 3? Yeah, sounds about right. I've survived three, but by the skin of my toes. |
Flix Keptick
Red Star. EoN.
45
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 20:32:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mary Sedillo wrote:I LOL my pants off at all of the failhards who say an LLAV is more durable then a tank.
-GARBAGE-
My repair tool, my passive/active resistance modules, and my knowledge of the maps makes me one elusive beasts.
You should also see how my tank hugs LLAVs. I am Snuggles the Bear and I am about to soften that FABRIC!!!
Enough though. LLAV's are easy to pop, just hard to solo, as a vehicle should be ESPECIALLY when its intended purpose is to stop and repair shields and armor. It is sad that people think that they should be easy to destroy especially when even the lower tier ones cost more than a single proto suit.
I CAN agree on scaling damage to suits based on speed, with the lowest speeds pushing people aside. I CAN agree on vehicles taking a percentage of damage based on the type of suit hit, to force thought to engage.
I DON'T agree with nerfing resistance or shields. I DON'T agree with nerfing speed/maneuverability.
Also, CCP should allow for more WPs for Logistic Vehicle roles, such as MCRU spawn ins, assists gained from scans, points for repairing armor and shields, and more!
Its severely lacking.
*note* Seeing as most people INSTANTLY assume that any form of reasonable discussion about LLAVs means you are a dirty murder taxi user, I can refer you to Espeon or LordChaos who can tell you I am a tank operator and a dropship users. Flying the ADS is like painting a masterpiece, and I am Michaelangelo, potential Aspbergers and everything. Good points exept the parts where you are self-complimenting and patting yourself on the back. You seriously have to stop doing that.
|
Monkey MAC
killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 21:00:00 -
[49] - Quote
Unfortunately until anti vehicle vehicles are available av will continue to dominate, after that av should be to prey on the stupid tankers, it should be enough to scare someone away, and kill them if they don't! |
DeadlyAztec11
Red Star Jr. EoN.
2012
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 22:04:00 -
[50] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Unfortunately until anti vehicle vehicles are available av will continue to dominate, after that av should be to prey on the stupid tankers, it should be enough to scare someone away, and kill them if they don't! Anti-vehicle vehicles? Like tank Destroyers? Those things are just weak tanks with really powerful guns, which are meant to pierce tanks specifically. |
|
Aizen Intiki
Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack
529
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 22:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Mary Sedillo wrote:Collision damage doesn't REALLY bug me, because I am in my tank mostly.
As for the person who said a tank hid through the barrage of three proto AV, he is one lucky SOB. Not saying it is impossible, but you guys messed up on your coordination. 3 proto AVs, properly coordinated, can take out most tanks. Just saying. Also, pics or it didn't happen.
Anyways, happy hunting. 2 Proto Forge guns and 1 Proto swarms CAN be taken, if you are in an ARMOR tank. Yeah he barely survived but he did activate his regen stuff enough to barely survive, plus he only had like 5000+ ish armor,ive seen tanks with 8k.... I dont know whats the big surprise.....If you really dont believe a tank can survive 3 proto av simultaneously then you are delusional and need to play as infantry a little more. See how good you can do vs tanks while you ALSO have infantry shooting at you. (im talking about GOOD tanks not militia crap ok?) I DO AGREE TANKS NEED A BUFF, this buff being a price reduction of (approximately) 1/3 . Tanks cant be buffed MORE. They already take a lot of specialization and organization to take down,and only 1 Tanker to wreak havok. If you Buff them more in any way we will end up with ALL infantry going AV or vehicles. But a price reduction is fair since the cost of getting a good tank is a little HIGH for their actual performance. I've done it, but had to recall, and had like 600 armor remaining.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |