| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
14521. All ammarrians i have one question for you - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Sergamon Draco wrote: I have been taught since childhood that our creator is benevolent and forgiving.So i like to ask you ammarians how your creator can be so insecure that he has to "test out" the people's faith in him? ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.09 08:01:00
|
14522. crusade against minmatar - in General Discussions [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: So far DSUT has proved that CCP hates minmatar, more precisely that the community hates minmatar. Observe: 1. minmatar suits have some of the worst stats and slot layouts in the game 2. every minmatar weapon in the gam...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.09 07:06:00
|
14523. Wonder if there are any other islanders in here. - in General Discussions [original thread]
NZ...were the biggest small ISLAND IN THE WORLD!
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.09 06:45:00
|
14524. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: A Swarm Launcher is no longer capable of turning a corner. Swarm Launchers require the following: Timing
Positioning
Situational Awareness
"Gun Game" (Unless you want to be ins...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.09 04:07:00
|
14525. Currently, how viable is the scrambler rifle in close quarter combat... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: paulna wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Very. More so than a combat rifle? No. But very, very effective. Agreed the automatic weapons are much more forgiving in CQC if you miss.....not to mention and correct me if ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 23:11:00
|
14526. Judge VS Bamm - in General Discussions [original thread]
Very interesting listening to judge. As an infrequent Rail Tanker, since I find the sniping style gameplay boring, I can agree with his points and feel the reduction to Rail Turret elevation is the kind of tweak this game needs to see more of as o...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 23:07:00
|
14527. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: To breach defences To **** up infantry if its built like that To take out enemy vehicles if its built like that...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 23:04:00
|
14528. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ads alt wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: To breach defences To **** up infantry if its built like that To take out enemy vehicles if its built like that To pin ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 23:02:00
|
14529. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: If a tank cant **** up infantry what do we have tanks for? could an LAV do it? lolno So then we have tanks just for taking out tanks but if no tanks are out then we dont need tanks which makes them po...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 23:01:00
|
14530. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Martyr Saboteur wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: To breach defences To **** up infantry if its built like that To take out enemy vehicles if its built like that To pin down the enemy ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 22:58:00
|
14531. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote: Just need to nerf turning speed and damage for large blaster turrets, then bring in MAVs that get bonuses to blasters. Making Anti Vehicle a tanks job and anti infantry doable with a tank but not nearly as effective as...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 22:42:00
|
14532. Currently, how viable is the scrambler rifle in close quarter combat... - in General Discussions [original thread]
paulna wrote: With the Amarr assault skill at level 5, how viable (currently) is the scrambler rifle in close quarter combat? Depending on your aim as viable as any other weapon, it does have high rate of fire and decent alpha damage so if y...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 22:36:00
|
14533. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: To breach defences To **** up infantry if its built like that To take out enemy vehicles if its built like that To pin down the enemy To provide a distraction ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 22:24:00
|
14534. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: To breach defences To **** up infantry if its built like that To take out enemy vehicles if its built like that To pin down the enemy To provide a distraction To assault objectives To support ground troops ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 22:11:00
|
14535. The 1.8 Amarr Assault Suit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Jakotar wrote: I just saw the posting of the the planned assault dropsuit stats for 1.8, and found myself feeling a little nervous about the changes being made to the assault ak.0. It seems that CCP is pushing amarr assault away from t...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 21:50:00
|
14536. Why Are HAVs In DUST? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Not saying they should be removed, but why are they here? They have no definitive purpose on the battlefield other than destroying other HAVs, which is circular. Agreed......but for the most part I feel like aspects in game tha...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 21:46:00
|
14537. THE KEY TO FIXING TANKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Egonz4 wrote: I like the idea of having around 4 tanks rolling around the match but militias should be really weak and rail guns need to be very short distance. Tanks should still cost the same except only madrugas and gunnlogis should be stron...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 21:07:00
|
14538. FW site? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: any site to show who has what in FW? Amarr is sitting at T3-4 meaning we own essentially most all of the FW systems in FW space. OK, let's make this a bit more clear...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 20:38:00
|
14539. FW site? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: any site to show who has what in FW? Amarr is sitting at T3-4 meaning we own essentially most all of the FW systems in FW space.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 20:28:00
|
14540. Battlefield Exploits you will never replicate...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: Major Exploit : Tanks Pfffff child..... this is not a place for you to cry about your issues. We all know they are broken, tankers more so that the rest (though some of us are less likely to admit it), still having a poor...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.03.08 11:22:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |