| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
361. Why are vehicles a class ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Rogatien Merc wrote: I'd prefer they drop the SP requirements for everything vehicle-related to about 25% of current levels but keep/increase the ISK price. That way they end up being used as specialized equipment without gi...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.22 18:38:00
|
362. This Game - in General Discussions [original thread]
ANON Illuminati wrote: straya fox wrote: Do you think more people will have a stake or the same guys will just own more land? well it could go a few directions tbh. 1. massive vets come back form either their original corps and reunite l...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.20 12:28:00
|
363. Japan rising - in General Discussions [original thread]
neurol forever wrote: Sorry for my English. According to dotlan today Nyain San corp. have 29 districts. So one more then AE. Without any meta game, without any "big" stories and "big" words in war room. They have my respect. "Japan Ris...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.20 12:24:00
|
364. This Game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Do you think more people will have a stake or the same guys will just own more land?
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.20 12:14:00
|
365. The loyalty store and rewards will spearhead the player market - in General Discussions [original thread]
One thought i had after reading the changes to FW thread the other day, is that with low or no ISK rewards in FW but potentially better rewards through LP, this would definitely promote the use of cheap or BPO gear in public matches in order to bo...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.20 12:03:00
|
366. Announcement:Statement on BPO Removal - in General Discussions [original thread]
it seems that BPO's work as intended but CCP's intentions changed. From the discussions in a few other threads the plan may be to reimburse players eventually the AUR value. My concern is that if BPO's are removed how can CCP put an AUR value on ...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.20 11:44:00
|
367. ccp confirmation on respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
So... no confirmation just "to my knowledge".
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.19 04:02:00
|
368. People you hate... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: Cosgar wrote: Void Echo wrote: Cosgar wrote: There's sources for every one of those points. I will never believe liberal news or media and certainly not liberal reporters. im sorry for not being a mindless sheep ...
- by straya fox - at 2013.10.19 03:49:00
|
369. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: straya fox wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: Your assumption is flawed in so many ways ... - proto assaults can use miltia gear and still greatly benefit from their SP, tankers can't - one cheap tank costs the ISK of 3 matches ...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 16:20:00
|
370. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: straya fox wrote: Read the thread derp, i clearly state that it is a tank, and is and should be destructive, and that in exchange for such power you gotta pay big ISK for it. I also read you saying that tankers are pa...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 16:15:00
|
371. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crash Monster wrote: FFS, a KDR is meaningless. Who cares? Oh wait, is the problem that you are having trouble getting your own KDR high enough? Seriously, a tank should should have a high KDR as it's a tank. If you want tankers to have a lo...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 16:10:00
|
372. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: I could care much less about my KDR. The problem is ISK efficiency and proto AV that can solo a tank in the right hands or if it's on a tower. As others have stated earlier, infantry can fall back to militia dropsuits and equipm...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 13:05:00
|
373. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Apparently, to care about K/D is to be vanilla assault. Seems that anybody who tries to have fun and use the other things in this game like tanks are roundly criticized and despised. That may be so, but not by me.
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 12:47:00
|
374. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: straya fox wrote: gbghg wrote: I've gone 20/0 in a dropship before, and I know of plenty pilots who have done likewise if not better than that, does that mean I'm paying for my K/DR? (It's 1.37 btw) and do you know how I got ...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 12:16:00
|
375. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: I've gone 20/0 in a dropship before, and I know of plenty pilots who have done likewise if not better than that, does that mean I'm paying for my K/DR? (It's 1.37 btw) and do you know how I got that score? The enemy team fielded no...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 11:17:00
|
376. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
Csikszent Mihalyi wrote: Void Echo wrote: Csikszent Mihalyi wrote: Void Echo wrote: don't care about K/D, I cant buy my fittings with K/D... iv tried... they only thing that is acceptable as income in the game is ISK so give me more of...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 11:12:00
|
377. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: straya fox wrote: ladwar wrote: straya fox wrote: Just saying mabe u guys are just paying for your KDR.. could much more easy get a high KD just going sniper. i guess but CCP addressed this with affirmative action i....
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 11:08:00
|
378. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: straya fox wrote: Just saying mabe u guys are just paying for your KDR.. could much more easy get a high KD just going sniper. i guess but CCP addressed this with affirmative action i.e. the new map design.
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 10:34:00
|
379. Tankers- mabe high ISK cost for tanks= high KDR - in General Discussions [original thread]
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote: straya fox wrote: Just saying mabe u guys are just paying for your KDR.. This is a valid question from OP. However, for purposes of balancing the battlefield and in-match gameplay: KDR is irrelevant. ISK is irr...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.23 10:17:00
|
380. .... Why do we accept null cannon hack points as spawn locations? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: You infiltrate successfully, you kill everybody, you begin to hack the point. *ssssssszzzzroooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooom* The guy you just killed spawns behind you, cloaked and invincible, and proceeds to take his time...
- by straya fox - at 2013.09.22 13:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |