| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
101. Increase rendering distance (graphics vs distance tradeoff?) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As a sniper I'd like CCP to increase the rendering distance. I'm getting fed up with redberries disappearing in full view, turrets appear out of nowhere and enemies walking through boxes and walls. I've heard this is because of the PS3's graphics...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.23 03:27:00
|
102. [Request] AFKers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Skipper Jones wrote: If you get 0 WPs in the game, then just make it so the get no isk and no SP from the battle. The Passive SP in-battle will work for anyone that gets above 0 WPs. (Also make it so DS pilots get WPs so they won't waste time i...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.16 17:44:00
|
103. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
low genius wrote: terrible idea. that is all. Why? Please note, the amount of SP that needs to be put into each skill will stay exactly the same as it is right now. It's a usability change only, making the SP cost more transparent and gettin...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 18:22:00
|
104. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: [quote=Alena Ventrallis]There are also far fewer skills in Dust than there are in EVE. The SP requirements are to keep players invested for long periods of time. Lowering that bar would reduce their reason to play. You'd b...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 18:13:00
|
105. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: I have major issues with your suggestion but the largest one is that if CCP followed all of your ideas we would be able to completely skill into everything much too quickly. Why? The SP needed to skill wouldn't change a...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 18:11:00
|
106. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cyrille Fodeux wrote: Some skills give better benefits and thus have to require more SP. If you-Śre too stupid to get this GTFO of here and play CoD. Lowering SP requirements isn't needed. Nor did I write anything about lowering SP requireme...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 18:06:00
|
107. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hecarim Van Hohen wrote: Didn't look into it and decided to spend those hard earned SP's anyway? Tough luck and maybe you learned to think before spending the said SP If CCP would take away people's hard-earned skills, wothout giving back the...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 16:45:00
|
108. map should have more bunkers or tunnels. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Interplanetary Insanitarium wrote: hat way heavies can be even more relevant than they are... Especially if they were somewhat tight spaces where people couldn't strafe and would either have to wait for us to reload or get lucky with explosions...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 14:36:00
|
109. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hi Iskandar, Thanks for your input and the interesting read! There's plenty of good comments around. I hope CCP will be able to put them to good use!
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 14:33:00
|
110. Remove SP multipliers from skill tree - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I find skill tree SP multipliers don't make sense and makes skilling more difficult than it needs to be. The disadvantages: a) Upgrades that don't DO anything. It's frustrating to gain a massive amount of SP, sink it in e.g. a lvl 4 dropsuit skil...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 13:53:00
|
111. New Active SP reward system - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't think CCP needs to add additional SP gain multipliers to satisfy newbies. They already have the benefit of cheap initial skills. That should be enough - if not, then the skill tree should be adjusted. That said, perhaps the skill tree sho...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.14 13:30:00
|
112. Request Bounty - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd set a bounty on AFK'ers. That'll teach them! MWOOHAHAHAHAAAAAAH!
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.13 16:08:00
|
113. Allow no weapon fitting - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like it. Speedy scout with explosives and hacking equipment can wreak havoc behind enemy lines!
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.09 13:30:00
|
114. Don't mind KD, but we need more stats. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd also like to see WP per match. That really shows how much mercs contribute to winning each skirmish or domination battle. It's more fair for logis, but also towards suicidal demolition tank hunters, shotgun scouts and stealthy uplink spammers.
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.08 22:57:00
|
115. [idea thingy] i think i know a way to make K/D leaderboards legit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
We're immortal mercenaries, who get revived in seconds to join the battlefield again and again. So what does a kill more or less matter? Helping the team and collecting WP is all that matters. I'd like to see total WP on the boards (so you can se...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.08 18:10:00
|
116. How to fix MCC camping in Skirmish and Domination matches - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: This is already how it is. The more WP you earn, the better your rewards. Yes, but it's disproportionate. The reward for gaining WP should be much bigger compared to "players" that go AFK.
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.07 17:27:00
|
117. How to fix MCC camping in Skirmish and Domination matches - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sleepy Shadow wrote: The problem is, noobs don't make 500 WP. Have you ever scrolled down the end game list and checked what the WP are at the bottom of the list? I have seen someone go 0/3 (or more) and they ranked below the AFKers. Meaning ...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.08.07 17:01:00
|
118. Decrease passive SP accumulation for those not logging in - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: [quote=lrian Locust][quote=FLAYLOCK Steve]ISo let put this all in two simple questions: What specific benefits would your proposition yield for us players? Why specifically do we need a system as per your proposition? This ...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.07.31 16:22:00
|
119. Decrease passive SP accumulation for those not logging in - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
FLAYLOCK Steve wrote: I don't have time to play all time. Lowering the passive count would mess up the reason why I spent over $200 on this game. If you don't like it than just leave. Nobody's talking about having to play all the time. But o...
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.07.25 00:34:00
|
120. Decrease passive SP accumulation for those not logging in - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thanks everybody, your feedback put things in perspective for me!
- by lrian Locust - at 2013.07.24 21:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |