| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
901. Please rename the Assault Rifle to something else - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
my vote is blaster rifle, but I think the gauss gun is going to take that spot.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.03 00:46:00
|
902. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bradric Banewolf wrote: The "nay sayers" aren't just negative nancies downing the game?! They notice potential issues that we do not, and ring the alarm so CCP doesn't let that bs slide. We should be thanking them for all the CCP blunder that t...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.03 00:14:00
|
903. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
mollerz wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: low genius wrote: the nay-sayers can keep doing their thing, but this game is on it's upward slope and that's all there is to it. ccp will establish dominance in the next 6 months I think. 45000 actu...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.03 00:14:00
|
904. Solo ambush gamemode (CCP/DEV) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ccp is not of the opinion that playing an fps solo is fun. they also know that you'll never climb to the top ranks of this game on your own. it seems unlikely that they'll give you an 'ambush' mode for lone-wolf players.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 22:48:00
|
905. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
mollerz wrote: I see. Still.. flatlined growth. Same old same old people. If CCP was a publicly traded stock they'd be hammered. you've also shown that you don't understand how eve offline works
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 06:59:00
|
906. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jack McReady wrote: I dont want to dissappoint you BUT there is no growth in numbers. vacation season in schools is starting now and those kids have currently nothing better to do then login and play some lobby shooters thus we might see a bit ...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 06:55:00
|
907. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
shadow drake35 wrote: dust will hopefully grow to be as big if not bigger than call of duty that is my dream my dream is to take over eve online... with dust pilots.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 06:39:00
|
908. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Vell0cet wrote: mollerz wrote: Vell0cet wrote: mollerz wrote: You guys realize that every dust player has more than one toon right? There are people with 10 alts. There are all kinds of padding to these stats. I...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 06:35:00
|
909. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: low genius wrote: Michael Arck wrote: inb4 "that's eve and dust players combined" but yea, I agree, the haters can keep on hating...and visiting forums on a game they don't play. Dust will keep moving right along. ...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:24:00
|
910. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectre-M wrote: With suit racial variety, some will come back and more will stay. I wanna see a steady 6000+ on Saturdays. NPE and more weapons will do lots for Dusts reputation. Here's to 1.8 and CCP Rouge. when that happens we'll brea...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:21:00
|
911. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: inb4 "that's eve and dust players combined" but yea, I agree, the haters can keep on hating...and visiting forums on a game they don't play. Dust will keep moving right along. i'm not bringing eve players into the conver...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:12:00
|
912. Aurum for name change. - in General Discussions [original thread]
N1ck Comeau wrote: How about you can see peoples name history so that they can't do all that corp scamming. Also you can search their old name and see the new one, that's what your employment history is for. people will contact your former...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:11:00
|
913. Socratic discussion: Jack of all trades - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: There is a lot of focus on specializing when developing your character. There are those of us who can not commit to a single role on the battle field. We specialize in adapting to battle as a whole. I find having more options...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:10:00
|
914. nothing free, still 4500 people logged in on sat - in General Discussions [original thread]
the nay-sayers can keep doing their thing, but this game is on it's upward slope and that's all there is to it. ccp will establish dominance in the next 6 months I think.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:08:00
|
915. Aurum for name change. - in General Discussions [original thread]
in new eden your name matters. you can never change (or run away) from your name. if you're the guy who shut down a major alliance, everybody knows.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.02 04:05:00
|
916. Am I the only one? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mike Ox Bigger wrote: Who thinks the RR is fine? To me it seems like the RR sucks up close and there's even times when I get in medium range and someone out strafes my rate of fire. What I mean by that is, I'm shooting a him and my rate of fire...
- by low genius - at 2014.02.01 17:54:00
|
917. How come no one QQ's over... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mike Ox Bigger wrote: Ambush and it's terrible spawns because it's a boring game mode. who cares if it's stupid and boring?
- by low genius - at 2014.02.01 17:05:00
|
918. [Request]No "Death" until you loose your clone. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
couldn't agree more. if the guy doesn't bleed you out, then he didn't get the kill.
- by low genius - at 2014.02.01 00:04:00
|
919. How a respec would effect the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
no respecs, and use the search engine. there's about 1000 threads like this.
- by low genius - at 2014.01.31 23:14:00
|
920. We can use a new AI - in General Discussions [original thread]
that's a caustic name. anyone using smart deploy doesn't have a spawn point. get it?
- by low genius - at 2014.01.31 23:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |