| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Why can't this just be COD? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: That's what actually needs to happen, just scrap it all and just copy COD but with fancy weapons. That's what we want, right guys? that is actuall what tank drivers want, ak...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.23 01:19:00
|
102. Infantry AV is now a full time class of its own. - in General Discussions [original thread]
i fear for what people are asking for. asking for infantry based weapons to outclass and out DPS large vehicle mounted weapons. the day when no tank is going to fight another because it will take 5 minutes or more to kill each other because a larg...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.23 01:10:00
|
103. Tanks are ruining this game - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: You ruin the game. Heh.Its funny how tankers keep insisting everything is ok.... its funny how you keep asking for the forge to have 10k range, unlimted range, full auto w/ 700 rounds and OHK...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.23 00:00:00
|
104. The LAV Slayers My Federation Monster - in General Discussions [original thread]
X-eon wrote: Recently, I feel as though the LAV has been regarded as JUST a transport or a Jihad jeep, but I'm here to tell you to not make that mistake. I'm a good enough LAV pilot to avoid deep shxt when there are tanks on the field and my gu...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.22 20:49:00
|
105. The Three Dimensional Battle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: CharCharOdell wrote: squad 1: ADS ADS ADS inf inf inf squad 2: Rail Missile Blaster inf inf inf squad 3: inf(6) it was amazing. FW and we were all on comms. Don't change a thing, CCP. This game is incredible. ...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.22 20:42:00
|
106. Guys, don't bother with FW - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Absoliav wrote: The appeal of FW isn't in the cost, it's in the tactical edge it gives you, for those with low SP it gives them a chance to stand with the big league Protos while still giving them a fair disadvantage...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.22 07:50:00
|
107. Guys, don't bother with FW - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: fawkuima juggalo wrote: Quote: Guys, don't bother with FW unless your really really good.... or a winimatard or gaylenteils Even if you win every battle, still not worth it. Basically sacrificing y...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.22 07:46:00
|
108. Guys, don't bother with FW - in General Discussions [original thread]
yea but a rare very are better than the same thing from the isk only and most LP is basically AUR gear without RL moneys. with that said i still like isk versions over the LP in almost all cases. the injector is ok, not really worth it but 100% ar...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.22 07:27:00
|
109. The spoiled rich kids that vehicle users have become - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: dogmanpig wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: At no point should someone who invested no SP and virtually no ISK be able to lock down an entire class of vehicles while remaining all but impervious to anything but their own stupidit...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 07:14:00
|
110. The spoiled rich kids that vehicle users have become - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: At no point should someone who invested no SP and virtually no ISK be able to lock down an entire class of vehicles while remaining all but impervious to anything but their own stupidity. That's imbalanced and if you can't se...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 07:02:00
|
111. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Sol wrote: For now the aerial red zone could be enlarged. It would allow ADS to at least fight these cowards. Also AV could then YOLO the problem. The reason they are back there is they want to be able to engage their targets with no cha...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 06:51:00
|
112. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: i hate you dogmanpig... thanks
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 06:48:00
|
113. I hate to be so final but Rail Tanks are COMPLETELY BROKEN - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: ladwar wrote: Shley Ashes wrote: What I see as the issues are: 1) Current AV is ineffective in most situations 2) HAV's are balanced against HAV's ((at least I think thats what CCP went for)also I don't think they a...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 06:43:00
|
114. The spoiled rich kids that vehicle users have become - in General Discussions [original thread]
where can i get the drugs that the OP is taking, im running low.
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.21 06:12:00
|
115. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: An even better solution would be to stop designing maps that have redlines that overlook the whole darn battefield. Spine Crescent is the absolute worst with this. And of course I believe redline rail turrets are a terrible ...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 09:21:00
|
116. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
meh... redzone had a reason to be made... it was a band aid which they still haven't fixed the root cause. then the redline is gonna stay basically the same. fix that issue by bring it back up and forcing ccp to rework the spawn and spawn protecti...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 09:07:00
|
117. HP re-gen limit for vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: dogmanpig wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: a vehicle should only be able to be bombarded by AV and rep itself to certain point. example, if a tank is brought down to ...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 08:59:00
|
118. Yes, more tank QQ (copy & pasted from War Room) - in General Discussions [original thread]
did you learn something today 8213?
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 08:41:00
|
119. HP re-gen limit for vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: a vehicle should only be able to be bombarded by AV and rep itself to certain point. example, if a tank is brought down to 30% of total HP, only 80% of total HP can be br...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 08:40:00
|
120. INSTANT FIX FOR TANKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: 'Remove the only gallente turret for it is a Cqc DPS machine, and is working as intended' If this is your Qq against a medium Rof, high damage turret, imagine a insanely high Rof turret, with low damage a shot(autocannons) i...
- by dogmanpig - at 2013.12.20 02:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |