| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
6161. Hey CCP I Also Has A Question? - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you answer I promise to buy a booster too :) When you are reviewing feedback, do you only consider feedback from corporations who partake in Planetary Conquest? Do you consider information from Public Matches valid? Or does it have to be from...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 16:35:00
|
6162. CCP I has a question! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Syeven Reed wrote: Atiim wrote: Remove all ISK generated from District Locking. I agree, completely. But what about the already generated money? The money that is sat in there wallet waiting for the market to be released. CCP is still ca...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 16:26:00
|
6163. CCP I has a question! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remove all ISK generated from District Locking.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 16:19:00
|
6164. 1.8 Logi Poll - in General Discussions [original thread]
Matari, because it's the only way I can have a Core Focused too that doesn't suck. Also, inb4 butthurt ASSaults derailing the thread
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 15:06:00
|
6165. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
AP Grasshopper wrote: Sorry your Gek lost its flavor and your swarm no longer one shots tanks.... 1 shot? Even 1.6 Somas weren't OHKed when fitted properly.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 14:55:00
|
6166. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Atiim wrote: Otavio Martins wrote: tanks are one of the things that makes this game different from CoD XD I'm pretty sure that it is the diversity, risk (yes tankers, I know this is a bit hard for you to und...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 14:54:00
|
6167. Av as sidearm - in General Discussions [original thread]
So the argument tankers are making is: "No because there would be too much AV on the field and Vehicles wouldn't stand a chance." That's a terrible argument. Especially when this argument is invalid: "No because there would be too many vehicles...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 14:52:00
|
6168. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Otavio Martins wrote: tanks are one of the things that makes this game different from CoD XD I'm pretty sure that it is the diversity, risk (yes tankers, I know this is a bit hard for you to understand), actual currency, and most importantly...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.18 14:17:00
|
6169. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: I'm for limiting hardeners to one per vehicle, and I've suggested that myself. But in return, hardeners need to resist more. 80% and 60% for shields and armor respectively. I should be nigh unkillable while my hardener...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.17 16:35:00
|
6170. Yet again, tankers decided the fate of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delanus Turgias wrote: Atiim wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: you're starting to sound like spkr;) just spit on him like the rest of us. Taking him as an adversary is demeaning yourself. I'm not attempting to be his "mirror" or "adversary." Th...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.17 15:38:00
|
6171. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
A lot of constructive feedback here. Great :)
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.17 15:33:00
|
6172. What does infantry want for vehicles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Evolution-7 wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Thumb Green wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Don't make Pyrex, Bamm Havoc and Me pull out the recordings. Wan't to see you failing at dropships from three angles? Release the kra... I me...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.17 15:23:00
|
6173. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Can agree on some points but their solutions do not benefit both side mutually, only AVers. Really? I thought an alarm system, flares, and countermeasures benifited pilots as well. Anything I should add in?
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:57:00
|
6174. Yet again, tankers decided the fate of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: you're starting to sound like spkr;) just spit on him like the rest of us. Taking him as an adversary is demeaning yourself. I'm not attempting to be his "mirror" or "adversary." This is simply an experiment. So far the re...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:55:00
|
6175. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thoughts? Concerns? Anyone?
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:50:00
|
6176. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: No. Low quality bait.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:24:00
|
6177. My Thoughts On Fixing The V/AV Problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yes, I know that this topic has been discussed to death, revived, and then discussed to death many times over. But since everyone has deposited their .02 ISK into the V/AV bank, I figured I might as well too. Free from any parody or trolling: ...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:20:00
|
6178. when will DUST be launching? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Officially? That already happened. Theoretically? 1.8 When all of the missing drop-suits and sidearms are added.
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 23:05:00
|
6179. Yet again, tankers decided the fate of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline tankers, without talking to the AVers. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated AVers and infantry, not just one infantry and some tankers who happen...
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 22:53:00
|
6180. A video perfectly summerizing Tanks VS AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
inb4 Spkr4TheScrub & Takahiro Kashkuken's epic posting
- by Atiim - at 2014.02.16 20:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |