| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3081. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=116266&find=unread Relevant suggestions.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 09:28:00
|
3082. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Re:7 ) Legalized theft. The tank and where I bought it was cheaper than what you are going to pay me in damages. Open market yo. Better not TK then huh? Let me remin...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 09:11:00
|
3083. Security Council - in The War Room [original thread]
Knight Solaire's new corp name. Bahahahahahahahahahaha. Hilarious.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 09:07:00
|
3084. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Re:7 ) Legalized theft. The tank and where I bought it was cheaper than what you are going to pay me in damages. Open market yo. Better not TK then huh?
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 05:50:00
|
3085. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: 1.) TEAM DEPLOY! 2.) CCP suggestion about tk's needs reworked. Some suggestions I have to mitigate them would be higher standing requirements to play in more important battles, essentially segrega...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 05:34:00
|
3086. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: KenKaniff69 wrote: It looks like they didn't think of what I just mentioned at all. Hopefully they will adopt a better system. Who knows? I feel like there may be a better TK protocol out there, b...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:50:00
|
3087. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: It looks like they didn't think of what I just mentioned at all. Hopefully they will adopt a better system. Who knows? I feel like there may be a better TK protocol out there, but I haven't seen anything quite right yet. I ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:33:00
|
3088. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beck Weathers wrote: How about just add it to PC? there you at least should know everyone. FW while not pub matches are still fairly public. Ill think more on its aswell, but till you can get entire team deploys it would be to easy to exploit...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:31:00
|
3089. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beck Weathers wrote: "4.) A voting system at the conclusion of each match allows for nomination of an MVP. Being voted MVP would provide extra LP rewards if a minimum number of votes are cast." No thank you, No matter how good someone dose to ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:17:00
|
3090. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: I would like to see FW have its own League System. Separate out the bad players, medium, and high... I don't know what it is about FW, but it seems the absolute WORST players in the game play there. This is why I suggest me in...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:16:00
|
3091. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forlorn Destrier wrote: Love how you completely ignored the part where CCP asked you to add these ideas to the existing threads - you know, the ones they are reading. good ideas by the way. Indeed. I prefer to create my own thread and then ...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:14:00
|
3092. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
KenKaniff69 wrote: As someone who runs vehicles, the entire concept of FW and reduced ISK or NO ISK all hinges on team deploy. I will not be playing FW if 4 LAV's run into my tank because blues are too stupid to drive straight or they walk onto...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:13:00
|
3093. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Perhaps the listing side gets a little ISK but not much LP? The ISK is our advance for signing up for the battle, you get the LP for winning. If you got absolutely nothing for losing a lot of newer players would stay the...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 04:11:00
|
3094. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Half of your suggestions are not necessarily good for FW nor fitting with FW EVE side tenets and don't bull **** me saying "This is Dust not EVE" because these are the same people you are dealing with in both games. El...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 03:38:00
|
3095. Cost vs Efficiency - in General Discussions [original thread]
Camp. and grab a scanner. Seriously. Let the proto bears deal with pushing and you hold down the fort sweeping scans. If you get scanned. Run away in whatever direction to deem worthy.
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 03:30:00
|
3096. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Asirius Medaius wrote: Agreed. Moving on to another point you mentioned (about the isk being replaced by LP), I really think that the LP should be added on top of a regular isk payout, otherwise, people are going to camp and take minimal appr...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 03:22:00
|
3097. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Asirius Medaius wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: 7.) Any TK responsible for destroying a vehicle will have to replace the isk, even if it draws his char into the negative. Out of all your points (most were good), this one made me smile the...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 03:01:00
|
3098. 10 suggestions for the new Faction Warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
1.) TEAM DEPLOY! 2.) CCP suggestion about tk's needs reworked. Some suggestions I have to mitigate them would be higher standing requirements to play in more important battles, essentially segregating lower, medium, and higher levels of standings...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 02:54:00
|
3099. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1.) TEAM DEPLOY! 2.) CCP suggestion about tk's needs reworked. Some suggestions I have to mitigate them would be higher standing requirements to play in more important battles, essentially segregating lower, medium, and higher levels of standings...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.19 02:52:00
|
3100. Sticky:Factional Contract Match Changes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I agree with Moody. TK's need to be revisited so they don't cost us so much over simple mistakes. In every PC match I play I see tk's. Every single one. Perhaps what they need to do is implement a system where the more important battles are fought...
- by Zatara Rought - at 2013.10.18 22:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |