| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20  | 
      
      
        241. You're in a street race... - in General Discussions [original thread] 
          I'd race my Porsche GT-R, right into a lampost, for the Lols of course. 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 03:07:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        242. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Slick Saan wrote:    Lurchasaurus wrote:  Yup, sounds like the type of scrub who cant afford to run proto and blames it on others....    oh I can afford it, but this is WAY better! This is killing protos in blueprint suits. This is getting tanke... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 03:01:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        243. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Lurchasaurus wrote:    Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:    Slick Saan wrote:    ER-Bullitt wrote:  I think we will be alright. the notes say that if you kill or deal enough friendly damage you will get booted.. so they will have a few jollies then off to p... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:59:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        244. So which if these FF side effects worry you the most? - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            ratamaq doc wrote:    True Adamance wrote:    ratamaq doc wrote:    True Adamance wrote:  Team Mates stacking Damage mods and proto AV who will hide in friendly zones and target me when I retreat back towards our lines......costing me millions o... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:52:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        245. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Slick Saan wrote:    ER-Bullitt wrote:  I think we will be alright. the notes say that if you kill or deal enough friendly damage you will get booted.. so they will have a few jollies then off to pubs until the next downtime or log off and hop o... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:44:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        246. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread] 
          FW is going to get messy people come 1.7. Dont forget to bring your towels and a clean change of clothing. 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:38:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        247. Friendly fire, pourquoi? - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            True Adamance wrote:    Vitharr Foebane wrote:    Lurchasaurus wrote:    DeadlyAztec11 wrote:  Seriously, am I the only person that isn't happy that griefing is going to be expanded?       Im stoked for the changes, I'm just never going to play ... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:25:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        248. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Ensar Cael wrote:  This is totally f*cking stupid. Its a free game and you are whinging because they are taking away your advantages? Stop being a scrub, HTFU and learn to rely on your skills not unlimited gear.  Do us all a favour and take this... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.02 01:32:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        249. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Maken Tosch wrote:    Admonishment wrote:  I hope this is a joke lol because I am pretty sure they are backed up by a plethora of lawyers with the ability to rip apart anything said, written, or acknowledged within seconds. Not something to trif... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.30 02:36:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        250. bunch of F!@#KING SWINDLERS - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Shion Typhon wrote:    Nova Knife wrote:     A lack of trust in this case only stems from a sense of entitlement and paranoia.        Entitlement? Why is that used as a slur? You have a strange take on the relationship between a company and its ... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 21:04:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        251. MARKET ERROR 70% OFF - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Maken Tosch wrote:    Herman Hardon wrote:  Here comes the EULA statement from ccp saying they can change the way math works , how ever and when ever they want !!!     I'm not sure how that's going to cover price discrepancies. Unlikely.  CCP, y... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:37:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        252. MARKET ERROR 70% OFF - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            SteelDark Knight wrote:    Nitrobeacon wrote:  CCP you are breaching the Consumer Protection Act (1987), you are giving out misleading price indications.    Yes, this has the opportunity to be a big mess.    Oh, what's that I see. A QQ comment a... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:31:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        253. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            billy bloodbath2 wrote:  BUMP    BUMP 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:24:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        254. [FeedBack] All AUR items @ 70% off [Boosters not included] - Thank you! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] 
            Centurion mkII wrote:  Thanks ccp for the deal for black friday! I'm going to get so much stuff.   Feedback for future events:  If you do something like this in the future it might be helpful to give us more of a warning. Same thing with the 50%... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.27 21:38:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        255. BPOs and the future - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] 
            Talos Vagheitan wrote:    Tallen Ellecon wrote:    Ulysses Knapse wrote:  BPOs as they currently are need to be completely removed from Dust 514. I don't care about the rage it will cause, they need to go in order to have a functional economy. C... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.27 21:36:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        256. Do BPO defenders even care about the long-term health of this game? - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            A'Real Fury wrote:  Did CCP care when they introduced and sold BPOs?  BPOs and the merc pack were the only items below -ú16 that had any real value to me and the vet and elite packs above -ú50.  As BPOs and the merc pack have been removed the va... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.27 00:30:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        257. BPOs and the future - in Feedback/Requests [original thread] 
            Ulysses Knapse wrote:    Seymor Krelborn wrote:  lol, you cant change the minds of the brainless...   I presume you are calling me brainless? How wonderfully ad hominem.    Seymor Krelborn wrote:  the point is it doesn't effect the eve economy, ... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 22:22:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        258. WTS Guristas LAV BPO Set Code - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            XANDER KAG wrote:  Are these still available? If you are really offering the code for 50 mill I'll buy one.    I wouldn't bother. CCP will probably take them come January. 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:28:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        259. Please help me understand about BPO removal. - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Maken Tosch wrote:  Only four specific BPOs are being removed as mentioned in the sticky notes here:  Source:  https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unread     Quote:   In regards to BPOs: we are removing and refu... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:26:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        260. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread] 
            Everything Dies wrote:    Chunky Munkey wrote:  [  It's rather too often that people miss the point of an argument online, but you just managed some sort of record there.  1. I answered that in the next sentence. That one you were apparently abl... 
          - by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:20:00 
          
  | 
      
      
      
        | Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20  | 
      
      
        
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |