| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
241. So which if these FF side effects worry you the most? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ratamaq doc wrote: True Adamance wrote: ratamaq doc wrote: True Adamance wrote: Team Mates stacking Damage mods and proto AV who will hide in friendly zones and target me when I retreat back towards our lines......costing me millions o...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:52:00
|
242. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slick Saan wrote: ER-Bullitt wrote: I think we will be alright. the notes say that if you kill or deal enough friendly damage you will get booted.. so they will have a few jollies then off to pubs until the next downtime or log off and hop o...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:44:00
|
243. Protos beware of FW 1.7! Any friendlies running proto on my team will seriously... - in General Discussions [original thread]
FW is going to get messy people come 1.7. Dont forget to bring your towels and a clean change of clothing.
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:38:00
|
244. Friendly fire, pourquoi? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Vitharr Foebane wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Seriously, am I the only person that isn't happy that griefing is going to be expanded? Im stoked for the changes, I'm just never going to play ...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.04 02:25:00
|
245. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ensar Cael wrote: This is totally f*cking stupid. Its a free game and you are whinging because they are taking away your advantages? Stop being a scrub, HTFU and learn to rely on your skills not unlimited gear. Do us all a favour and take this...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.12.02 01:32:00
|
246. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Admonishment wrote: I hope this is a joke lol because I am pretty sure they are backed up by a plethora of lawyers with the ability to rip apart anything said, written, or acknowledged within seconds. Not something to trif...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.30 02:36:00
|
247. bunch of F!@#KING SWINDLERS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shion Typhon wrote: Nova Knife wrote: A lack of trust in this case only stems from a sense of entitlement and paranoia. Entitlement? Why is that used as a slur? You have a strange take on the relationship between a company and its ...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 21:04:00
|
248. MARKET ERROR 70% OFF - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Herman Hardon wrote: Here comes the EULA statement from ccp saying they can change the way math works , how ever and when ever they want !!! I'm not sure how that's going to cover price discrepancies. Unlikely. CCP, y...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:37:00
|
249. MARKET ERROR 70% OFF - in General Discussions [original thread]
SteelDark Knight wrote: Nitrobeacon wrote: CCP you are breaching the Consumer Protection Act (1987), you are giving out misleading price indications. Yes, this has the opportunity to be a big mess. Oh, what's that I see. A QQ comment a...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:31:00
|
250. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
billy bloodbath2 wrote: BUMP BUMP
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.28 19:24:00
|
251. Do BPO defenders even care about the long-term health of this game? - in General Discussions [original thread]
A'Real Fury wrote: Did CCP care when they introduced and sold BPOs? BPOs and the merc pack were the only items below -ú16 that had any real value to me and the vet and elite packs above -ú50. As BPOs and the merc pack have been removed the va...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.27 00:30:00
|
252. WTS Guristas LAV BPO Set Code - in General Discussions [original thread]
XANDER KAG wrote: Are these still available? If you are really offering the code for 50 mill I'll buy one. I wouldn't bother. CCP will probably take them come January.
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:28:00
|
253. Please help me understand about BPO removal. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Only four specific BPOs are being removed as mentioned in the sticky notes here: Source: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=122274&find=unread Quote: In regards to BPOs: we are removing and refu...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:26:00
|
254. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything Dies wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: [ It's rather too often that people miss the point of an argument online, but you just managed some sort of record there. 1. I answered that in the next sentence. That one you were apparently abl...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.26 02:20:00
|
255. Monthly Subscription - in General Discussions [original thread]
KayDidYue wrote: Komodo Jones wrote: Why do you guys want BPOs back so badly? I don't want "BPO's" as they have been so badly. They didn't provide CCP or DUST anything to help them advance anything. My suggestion was a type of BPO that...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 22:30:00
|
256. Monthly Subscription - in General Discussions [original thread]
zibathy numbertwo wrote: Sorry, but this is a bad idea. BPOs are bad for the economy. Period. CCP will not do this. What is this magical 'economy' you speak of, because as of yet, I have not seen nor heard from CCP that this 'economy' is a p...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 22:26:00
|
257. Is it just me or is there a trend? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kira Takizawa wrote: A new console comes out and people are hyper about it then when the hype dies down they complain. The complain consist of the game titles aren't what they thought it would be or it's the same gameplay (CoD, Battlefield, etc...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 21:29:00
|
258. WTH guys aren't you all supposed to be gone? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echoist wrote: Vrain Matari wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Oh look at that. A free to play shooter on a console that has none ( = no competition from F2P games) only gets 4.4k players as it's high level A free to play shooter that was release...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 21:05:00
|
259. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Only since CCP decided to FUC K them up themselves, as they are now they are perfectly suited to fulfill their intended purpose, and so as well as any other BPO or module in the game.
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 20:52:00
|
260. Blueprint equipment, Will it be permanent? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kane Fyea wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: Saheiji wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: This is about CCP having no respect for their customers. I disagree. The customers, players, Mercenaries - whatever you want to call us - have been asking CCP...
- by Yelhsa Jin-Mao - at 2013.11.25 19:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |