Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
6141. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: True Adamance wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: My view on the Tank vs. Infantry balance. Large turrets should have little to no infantry slaying power. Suppressive abilities at best (Via splash damage that makes it harmful...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 02:28:00
|
6142. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. Of course there is. -Anti Tank -Siege and Suppression -Direct Infantry Support...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 02:21:00
|
6143. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: True Adamance wrote: Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. Of course there is. -Anti Tank -Siege and Suppression -Direct Infantry Sup...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 02:16:00
|
6144. The caldari corp is growing! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Make your posts after you win.
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 01:03:00
|
6145. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortishai Belmont wrote: Could have something to do with proto blueprints. But that's just a theory. Every Matari has an excuse on their lips right now......wonder why?
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:51:00
|
6146. Are we not mercenaries? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: So now there are loyalty ranks......corporal, brigadier, etc. But aren't we mercenaries? Are we not the prostitutes of war? What kind of factions would grant such status and prestige to sell-outs? That would be like biddi...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:47:00
|
6147. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Edau Skir2 wrote: Oh wait. All the good players have switched sides...the traitors must of taken pity on you dogs. Let me correct you here, welfare warrior. The Amarrians have finally gotten bored of the broken PC mechanic...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:46:00
|
6148. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dergle wrote: There needs to be a vehicle for taking out infantry, otherwise there is no real point for vehicles. Of course there is. -Anti Tank -Siege and Suppression -Direct Infantry Support -Bombardment -Field Demolition
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:44:00
|
6149. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: Two good tankers working together are hard to kill but this is not a flaw, just good playing. AV is effective against tanks now, no real changes need to be made. A shield tank can be difficult but armor tanks are fairly e...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:40:00
|
6150. A Comparison of Armor and Shield HAV Regeneration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. Gunlogi can dual tank 2. Madrugar depends on fit can barely put owt in the high slots unless tank is weakened to an extent 3. Madrugar has better depression 4. Madrugar is faster, nitro added even better 5. Armor...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:33:00
|
6151. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
LORHAK. OLD CHAP! HOW ART THOU?
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:25:00
|
6152. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: True Adamance wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: My idea for bonuses to these tech 2 (Specialized) HAVs: Marauders - 6 passenger slots (1 pilot, 2 gunners, 3 passengers) serve as a Frontline bastion to support infan...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.17 00:12:00
|
6153. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Edau Skir2 wrote: True Adamance wrote: Edau Skir2 wrote: Oh wait. All the good players have switched sides...the traitors must of taken pity on you dogs. Depends on who you encountered. LolRomansboat is a new channel that has become s...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:56:00
|
6154. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: My idea for bonuses to these tech 2 (Specialized) HAVs: Marauders - 6 passenger slots (1 pilot, 2 gunners, 3 passengers) serve as a Frontline bastion to support infantry, and give people a reason to want bring in enfor...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:54:00
|
6155. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: True Adamance wrote: A triple rep tank is not following Gallentean lore. It was an exploit developed by players and masked as legitimate gameplay. No Gallentean ship will ever use triple reps. Maybe 2 at best. One Anc...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:45:00
|
6156. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Immortal John Ripper wrote: Tears... Delicious minmatar tears! Just noted you sig...... is that true? Probably a combination of those vehicle and RP threads. If so not only do we own the forums but the Warzone as well......
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:43:00
|
6157. AMARR/CAL STOMPING IN FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Edau Skir2 wrote: Oh wait. All the good players have switched sides...the traitors must of taken pity on you dogs. Depends on who you encountered. LolRomansboat is a new channel that has become somewhat synonymous with Amarr FW Syncs alongs...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:29:00
|
6158. There is a reason the Federation will always exist - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Falere Zateki wrote: True Adamance wrote: Falere Zateki wrote: An empire does not survive by mingling with the conquered. Of course does. The only reason we seek to conquer the unenlightened is so that we can become one united people...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:27:00
|
6159. AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: If you think Swarm Launchers are the most popular AV weapon due to their ease of use, you're heavily misinformed. The real reason why they're so popular is because only 1/5 of the classes in DUST can actually FGs, and PLCs while gr...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:24:00
|
6160. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: What if we don't reduce hardener effectiveness, but just add a speed reduction when using them? Like say, 50% damage for 50% speed. This could also be applied to active damage mods. I a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:23:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |