| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
6161. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: True Adamance wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal?...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:19:00
|
6162. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: I'm thinking that std tanks get an extra high or low like old times, 4/2 on a caldari for example, then giving the enforcers that same layout with the extra off rack mod, 4/3 on caldari for example. The...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:17:00
|
6163. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: It wouldn't have any PG and CPU increase in fact it would have significantly less PG and CPU than a standard hull. So as to fit less eHP modules for its static role bonus, but allowing it to have jus...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:11:00
|
6164. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Increasing Main stack +1 like the other "side grades" but ensure that that slot is not going to be fitted with an eHP module or if a fitting modules one that does not provide too potent benefits due ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 23:00:00
|
6165. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal? Only an increase to torque is fine, tanks...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:59:00
|
6166. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Yeah not a huge fan of 3/3 unless it was Minmatar. Hmmm so you're looking at a +1 to main rack for both Enforcers and Marauders? so 4/2 and 2/4 for Cal & Gal? Only an increase to torque is fine, tanks are pretty fast as...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:45:00
|
6167. AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Lightning35 Delta514 wrote: Ok so with the news that we are getting our tanks back I'd like to give a word. With these new tanks, we will see a new load of swarms everywhere. I personally think that AV will need to be looked at. We can all ag...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:17:00
|
6168. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Not really sure how that would affect the use of Enforcers since most tankers would be forgoing small turrets to fit the better tiered ones anyway...... Moreover the Turret Upgrades skills probably...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 22:12:00
|
6169. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Something I need to add; if we are talking side grades like not objectively better than basic tanks, or side grade in how the assault suit is a "side ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 21:25:00
|
6170. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Funkmaster Whale wrote: I really wish they'd buff the Forge base damage a bit, or at least make the weak spot critical damage bonus a bit higher. Swarms are so easy-mode compared to FG which has to consider projectile travel time vs target move...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 21:19:00
|
6171. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Something I need to add; if we are talking side grades like not objectively better than basic tanks, or side grade in how the assault suit is a "side grade" to the medium frame? Or the sentinel is ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 21:05:00
|
6172. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I tested a Gunnlogi with an extender and 2 hardeners vs ADV missiles with no damage mods in a PC last night. The missile took off half the shield of the Gunnlogi. PRO missile with a damage would melt...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 20:54:00
|
6173. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: also, vehicles and AV would be fine, if we had gallente swarms and forge guns so we had viable AV vs shields. as it is a good swarmer can probably solo a maddy due to the high damage vs armour whereas it can take several...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 20:27:00
|
6174. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: True Adamance wrote: You are bad AVers then. There is literally no way a Madrugar can get away with than unless you are ******* up unbelievably. I easily single handedly popped a missile tank that was originally in the bunc...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 20:05:00
|
6175. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: If the designers intended to allow invincible vehicles, they have succeeded. I just left a match where 4 swarmers and 2 forgers constantly bombarded 2 repper maddies for a full ten minutes while the maddies remained in the same ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 18:41:00
|
6176. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: True Adamance wrote: CommanderBolt wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^there are problems with fitting small turrets. 1) they take away from fitting more tank 2) small turrets have always been kind of glitchy 3) people a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 17:59:00
|
6177. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^there are problems with fitting small turrets. 1) they take away from fitting more tank 2) small turrets have always been kind of glitchy 3) people afk in vehicles or are otherwise useless 4) ther...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:27:00
|
6178. Installations. - in General Discussions [original thread]
IAmDuncanIdaho II wrote: Mejt0 wrote: There is always a random red douchebag operateing redline rail instalation. lol. What are you saying? Tankers should be allowed to drive around without taking fire? Or is it if the red fires from the ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:21:00
|
6179. I wanna be famous. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KILL3R H3LLH0UND wrote: I wanna be famous and get my name out there. I want people to see my name and instantly think [insert stuff here] about me. John Ripper - So many alts and stuff I'm losing track. He's famous, everybody knows him to some ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:13:00
|
6180. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just so people are aware. A Tank Destroyer historically referred to an Armoured Fighting Vehicle expressly designed to fight other tanks. Basically the Tank Destroyer was an incredibly large calibre self propelled artillery piece armed with a fix...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.12.16 08:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |