| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
11861. LP payout method is BS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: I am actually enjoying the noncompetitive style of play in factional warfare. It means that I can focus on what needs to be done to win the match, not what I need to do to get number one on the scoreboard, so I can get payed...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:36:00
|
11862. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: It looks like Dev is on today's menu, mercs! Keep an eye out for "Other Contracts" in your Battle Finder - first set of contracts will show up in about 40 minutes. Let the Dev Invasion begin! Will you be covering multipl...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
11863. LP payout method is BS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Indeed since with relative ease even during a Minmatar push I can still run Missions and complexes with out having to even fight an enemy ship.....
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:22:00
|
11864. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: True Adamance wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: can anyone give me a reason why? I still haven't heard any argument at all, let alone a sound one. Why should you limit a very enjoyable playstyle to one person a ma...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:19:00
|
11865. Anyone else get cheated out of skill points because of CCP's faulty dev blog? - in General Discussions [original thread]
In the end I attribute my issue with FW not down to skilled players vs non skilled players, I attribute it to CCP doing a **** poor job introducing the racial groups of New Eden. They fail to impress that there is not good or evil, no right or wr...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 02:16:00
|
11866. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: The issue is not the power of tanks. They are in a good place as it is. the issue is how many are getting deployed at once. I saw 12 tanks last battle. There were more people in tanks than running infantry. That's ridicu...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:37:00
|
11867. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: can anyone give me a reason why? I still haven't heard any argument at all, let alone a sound one. Why should you limit a very enjoyable playstyle to one person a match, you might as well make the HAV a respawning as...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:35:00
|
11868. the good/bad old days - in General Discussions [original thread]
I miss when FW was based on actual loyalty and not just farming racial content.
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:32:00
|
11869. FW is a downward spiral - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: A better solution would be the player market. That way people can properly fund their FW and people are incentivised to fight for the losing factions because their LP store items are worth more. Could you imagine ho...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:22:00
|
11870. Which is better in your opinion, standard RR or assault RR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Demetrius Grenaline wrote: Why are people talking about range and charge up? They're the same for both weapons. No downside ti having scope then, but that's the point no visible benefits on the Assault variant as the iron sights just aren't ...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:11:00
|
11871. Which is better in your opinion, standard RR or assault RR? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Drake435 wrote: I've only used the prototype assault version of the RR but I see that many people use the standard variant over the assault. Why? More damage, relatively similar rof (sort of), no noticeable charge up, and scope.
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 01:07:00
|
11872. I've been doing a census - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: True Adamance wrote: You never need to retreat with a Sica, not to mention you can turn on a dime and don't have to be moving forwards or backwards to turn the tank. Sica should be the clear choice as Armour tanks ar...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 00:48:00
|
11873. I've been doing a census - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Since 1.7 dropped, I have been making a list of how many Caldari vehicles and Gallente vehicles that I see on the field. Long story short, i've got a ratio (Caldari to Gallente...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.16 00:05:00
|
11874. Is It Safe For Me To Say? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: I told you so. I bloody well told you so. [edit] Forgot Something Anyways, remember back when I made that thread called Tank 514 saying that if pilots ever got their wish then even MLT HAVs will be able to shrug off PRO AV? R...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 23:50:00
|
11875. It feels so good to have so much power..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just wait until Gaven or Zelarrs catches you while you are over a planet......
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 23:27:00
|
11876. It feels so good to have so much power..... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Join me in vaporising people! /me has performed over 100 strikes. Now begin the awoxing! I've only done 5-6 Strikes, haven't lost a ship too! I'm still skilling into the Amarrian stuff,...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 23:06:00
|
11877. Stop playing Amarr faction - in General Discussions [original thread]
Omareth Nasadra wrote: remember that event that gave carthum scr if you fought for amarr, same kind of bandwagon, payback is a biatch isn't it Bandwagon was always in the Minmatar side. Theat event simply evened out the FW player bases, Mi...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 22:49:00
|
11878. new weapon - in General Discussions [original thread]
Danotalo FLIPIN wrote: and if the shield is a light weapon the commando could have it and an AR which would be op I don't see how, the Shield would be a weapon that would only work with side arms, forcing the commando to run a side arm.
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 22:47:00
|
11879. change the faction items - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: I do lament that there are no converted Imperial Madrugars or Imperial Gunlogi. replated in platinum, with modified shield and armour values....... I would fight 10X harder knowing I could secure one...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 22:41:00
|
11880. Stop playing Amarr faction - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: 843-BANE wrote: You fools just need to band together! GIVE US A CHALLENGE! (Don't let my pic fool you, I am Gallente through and through) Give us a challenge? You talk as if you guys winning is because you are SO GO...
- by True Adamance - at 2013.12.15 22:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |