| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
6541. what do you run on your missile tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
2x Armour Plates....... I wanted to make a Khanid Tank alright!
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 01:10:00
|
6542. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
devonus durga wrote: 1lb of c4, regardless of what material it hits, has the same explosive impact against all targets. Its how that target responds that changes. Unfortunately, even a scifi setting such as dust, physics still apply. The same e...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 00:54:00
|
6543. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
BOOM and what could have been and interesting and valuable discussion about balance and vehicle roles was BLOWN wide open by a certain group of individuals once again waltzing in with assertions of player supremacy and calls of "Git Gud Scrub".......
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 00:45:00
|
6544. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: The dark cloud wrote: Not this crap again. Is it just my impression or since the armor dropships lost their god mode vs swarms you are complaining about AV ALOT more? Well its a hard world when crutches are being ta...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 00:17:00
|
6545. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Not this crap again. Is it just my impression or since the armor dropships lost their godmode vs swarms you are complaining about AV ALOT more? Well its a hard world when crutches are beeing taken away. *facepalms.........
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 00:05:00
|
6546. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: I know I was so looking forwards to that. For everyone's information I'm not against AV being effective against HAV. I'm all for it, but its a fine line between effective and..... loltankdead....... I als...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.24 00:04:00
|
6547. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Does anyone have a valid argument against this? Rattati even said that client side updates are possible now, so why not? **** vehicle reintroduction. GImme Amarr HAV! PS: Sorry Darth but I want my Amarr HAV!
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:50:00
|
6548. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: You know I'm more inclinded to suggest a lot of this bulls **** is because neither side has been willing to sit down on skype and discuss it in a less biased manner. And before the AVers start yelling "I'm ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:47:00
|
6549. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: True Adamance wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: im not saying dropships need to be stronger. But if AV is balanced against one of these vehicles whith the same damage profile... how can it be balanced against the ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:39:00
|
6550. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beld Errmon wrote: I would suggest that Assault dropships are a tech 2 vehicle and should have a different resist profile too ordinary dropships. BAM right on the money there Beld. For clarification A T1 Punisher might have armour resistan...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:31:00
|
6551. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: im not saying dropships need to be stronger. But if AV is balanced against one of these vehicles whith the same damage profile... how can it be balanced against the other? A Stinger missile does the same damage to a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:29:00
|
6552. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know I'm more inclinded to suggest a lot of this bulls **** is because neither side has been willing to sit down on skype and discuss it in a less biased manner. And before the AVers start yelling "I'm unbiased and the preacher of balance"......
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:26:00
|
6553. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to say is wrong. Are you saying HAVs should be harder to damage? No I think he is saying ADS need to be harder to damage by limiting the amount of damage AV options can do a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:23:00
|
6554. Tanks and Dropships take the same damage. Explain CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: So a forge or swarm does the same damage to a dropship as it does to a tank. So CCP. Explain how you feel that two vehicles that have vastly different effective Hit Points should take the same damage from AV? I defies...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 23:12:00
|
6555. LOL, 2 weeks on Vacation and HotFix Bravo comes out... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Eko Sol wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: Nerfed vehicle reppers All they had to do was increase efficacy for swarms against Incubus. Not really, because then you'd still have the triple rep Madrugars. And...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 22:42:00
|
6556. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: True Adamance wrote: Taurion Bruni wrote: so now we have an inconsistency with the orbital strike. I wonder If we should give out orbitals for WP at all anymore not we have concrete ways of establishing a player-giv...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:56:00
|
6557. An interesting dust news article - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: True Adamance wrote: Well if and when Legion is green lit I will consider purchasing a PC, until then I have no intent to do anything but look into the PS4. Good call, although the guys in PIE could always use a...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:55:00
|
6558. An interesting dust news article - in General Discussions [original thread]
GeneralButtNaked wrote: True Adamance wrote: Some of those screen shots looks nice, primarily the star map, over head view, and main menu. It's a real shame I'm going to have to get a PC for Legion. It is a real shame that you are going ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:41:00
|
6559. Logistics boosting - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taurion Bruni wrote: so now we have an inconsistency with the orbital strike. I wonder If we should give out orbitals for WP at all anymore not we have concrete ways of establishing a player-given OB? CONCORD would never sanction space to ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:39:00
|
6560. No railgun, no vehicle balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think what you have to realise Atiim is yes vehicle pilots called for buffs....... this iteration of HAV is not what we were expecting and, in hindsight, not what we wanted. We just wanted tanks to be more durable...... perhaps that could have ...
- by True Adamance - at 2014.06.23 21:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |