| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
2561. In depth chart explaining why Scrambler is OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: People always ask for charts and numbers to back up why the SR is OP because they're to scared to admit it. Well i decided to go ahead with some help from some friends, show how the scrambler rifle stands to other weapon...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 02:09:00
|
2562. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: True Adamance wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: New tanks are laughably OP. I troll around with dual hardener dual rep blaster maddy and i went 17/0 this morning while simultaneously playing hearthstone :D So easy :) I don't th...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 01:59:00
|
2563. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: New tanks are laughably OP. I troll around with dual hardener dual rep blaster maddy and i went 17/0 this morning while simultaneously playing hearthstone :D So easy :) I don't think the rep values are wrong however I do ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 01:46:00
|
2564. personal best - in General Discussions [original thread]
My best that I have that I can prove was 52/1 on the last day of Uprising 1.6 in my beautiful Ion Maddy. Best I can recall is 66/0 but I didn't have the piece of mind to photograph the score board. Good score by the way its hard cracking into th...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 01:32:00
|
2565. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
duster 35000 wrote: Izlare Lenix wrote: So I was running around in a scout av suit with plasma cannon, lai dai packed av nades and advanced REs. This marduk was getting shoot at by a friendly tank. He was in half armor, hardner active when...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.17 00:50:00
|
2566. Blaster Tank CQC Advice? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mex-0 wrote: GTFO of your tank and fight like a real man. Real men tank. Sissies **** around on foot not defending their own turrets, CRU, or Supply Depots whining miserably that because they neglected their toys and forgot to feed the dog...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 22:10:00
|
2567. Blaster Tank CQC Advice? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stupid Blueberry wrote: You have to "orbit" them at close range. Blasters have way faster tracking than the other turrets, especially with pro. 5. Use this to your advantage. With the turn angle on Armour HAV this cannot be achieved. On a Sh...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 22:04:00
|
2568. Fuking tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Izlare Lenix wrote: So I was running around in a scout av suit with plasma cannon, lai dai packed av nades and advanced REs. This gladious was getting shoot at by a friendly tank. He was in half armor, hardner active when I first saw him. I f...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 22:00:00
|
2569. Blaster Tank CQC Advice? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: True Adamance wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Avoid the main roads. People love using paved roads for some reason: use this to your advantage. Ambush them when they pass by. Do not engage until you are well within ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 20:25:00
|
2570. Blaster Tank CQC Advice? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Avoid the main roads. People love using paved roads for some reason: use this to your advantage. Ambush them when they pass by. Do not engage until you are well within your optimal. You need to get as much damage done b...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 20:15:00
|
2571. Blaster Tank CQC Advice? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lupus Wolf wrote: I haven't been in any good CQC tank fights since I started playing in late 1.6/early 1.7 (CQC railgun Sica, good times). I'm gonna try running the Maddy fit I made. Any advice for engaging other tanks up close and personal? I ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 20:09:00
|
2572. an eye for an eye - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sicerly Yaw wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sadly you have to engage vehicle users as they are just as important a facet of gameplay as infantry combat. I do think its a shame that infantry whims and demands have taken precedence over those of...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 02:20:00
|
2573. killing proto tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: A Heatsink will do you much better on a blaster tank than a damage mod. It only increases it by about 20 damage per shot while a sink allows you to make up more than the damage before overheat kicks in. With b...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 01:48:00
|
2574. an eye for an eye - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sicerly Yaw wrote: True Adamance wrote: Sicerly Yaw wrote: True Adamance wrote: If my in put means anything I view the situation as something that played out in the following manner..... Your enemy was in a situation where they were ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 01:45:00
|
2575. an eye for an eye - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sicerly Yaw wrote: True Adamance wrote: If my in put means anything I view the situation as something that played out in the following manner..... Your enemy was in a situation where they were more cohesive and using communication to have ...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 01:31:00
|
2576. Jumping? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's just hard to get used to. This weekend was the first time I saw jumping used as a real weapon and damn those Mk.0's were fast as hell.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 01:16:00
|
2577. an eye for an eye - in General Discussions [original thread]
If my in put means anything I view the situation as something that played out in the following manner..... Your enemy was in a situation where they were more cohesive and using communication to have an advantage as well as maintaining a high lev...
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 01:13:00
|
2578. Dear Blueberries - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vicious Minotaur wrote: No. +50 Fine. +100 WP Now no one gets them.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 00:54:00
|
2579. What is the most irritating topic to discuss to you on the forums? - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: True Adamance wrote: Amarr HAV threads. A surprise to hear from you of all people. I hate making them but have no choice.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.16 00:06:00
|
2580. What is the most irritating topic to discuss to you on the forums? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Amarr HAV threads.
- by True Adamance - at 2015.03.15 23:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |