| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1801. ccp sux ass - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: is anyone else concerned that **** is censored but fucks is not? Holy fucks
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:13:00
|
1802. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Full support. I love your threads now. Just a simple idea for the 2 types of rails: the AI one has lower range, a larger clip, higher splash damage/larger radius, and lower direct damage. The AV ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:10:00
|
1803. reserved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Taka I can't begin to describe to you how uneducated your responses are. I know your stance, I've seen a lot of posts you have made, and they are ALWAYS the same. Use some damn sense man. For example....
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:05:00
|
1804. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: no, it is not the smae idea as you had. Both blasters are useless. 200-250 meters, and 350-400 meters are neither useless, although those damage values are. Short range should have old compressed stat...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 02:49:00
|
1805. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 01:40:00
|
1806. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: I think the answer is both. I'm not finished yet, there is still a lot of subject matter to cover. But yes, both, all turrets need variants that help define the given role. Among those variants, you wil...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:54:00
|
1807. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed are extreme enough one way or another. Let's...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:51:00
|
1808. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top en...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:48:00
|
1809. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top end Anti Vehicle weapons. Put Anti Infantry a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:29:00
|
1810. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:26:00
|
1811. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:54:00
|
1812. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have ideas for turrets, and how tanks and infantry should interact. Which can be summed up as support roles. Tanks SUPPORT infantry Infantry SUPPORT tanks Which means tanks assist more with kills against infantry, than outright killing infant...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:33:00
|
1813. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: I don't think there is a problem with turrets atm they seem fine I'm sure the other variants will be back when they are ready. I think it will be proto lvl tanks that take advantage of the other variants of turrets because the...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:26:00
|
1814. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction(maybe more if needed, and a 25% ROF reduct...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:20:00
|
1815. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
The legend345 wrote: this is stupid lol No, yr stupid. lol
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 22:39:00
|
1816. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Didn't we have variants pre1.7? I liked my missles cycled and my blasters scattered. If I had to use a rail I liked compressed. We did! That's something forgotten when people go to discussing tanks. Often times, you forget...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 21:47:00
|
1817. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: I don't quite understand what your approach is. Are you proposing to have variants for all turrets, with different roles or are you proposing to remove AI capability from all large turrets, while changing small turrets into ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 21:40:00
|
1818. When taking about AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Proto AV is a big reason why I support teiricide. You can't honestly expect the current types of AV to be balanced towards HAVs without being OP towards dropships. This is something I need to consider.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 20:18:00
|
1819. A Question to Tankers.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Which pisses you off more: A) When the name that suicided and the name that killed your tank with REs matches. or B) When the name that sucided and the name that killed your tank with REs doesn't match? Alternatively, ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 20:16:00
|
1820. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Full support. I love your threads now. Just a simple idea for the 2 types of rails: the AI one has lower range, a larger clip, higher splash damage/larger radius, and lower direct damage. The AV one would have longer ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 20:14:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |