| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2761. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* They're remote explosives, and they also detonate if a friendly tank rolls over them. Therefore,...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:00:00
|
2762. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer.....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:00:00
|
2763. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:59:00
|
2764. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: It looks like Dev is on today's menu, mercs! Keep an eye out for "Other Contracts" in your Battle Finder - first set of contracts will show up in about 40 minutes. Let the Dev Invasion begin! How will this align with US E...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:58:00
|
2765. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destroy us. Well, now CCP ma...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:53:00
|
2766. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any motivation to play beca...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:47:00
|
2767. Tank 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Yeah Yea YEAH! Nerf AV they are OP as heck, and they can kill me! The best way to kill a tank should be a tank! AV is not meant for being ANTI-VEHICLE, it is meant for supporting tanks and we can't have anything counter tanks but...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:45:00
|
2768. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=128947&find=unread Here is the main thread ^^^^ A it is,im pretty sure that tank vs AV is very balanced. Good job. The only problem is you didnt take into ac...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 02:43:00
|
2769. COMPLETE UTTER BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Evert112 wrote: Same here... Got kicked from Amarr FW, because of blueberry tanks driving over my proximity explosives!?? The little cracks ccp let's slip in, can be real rage-fuel.. So then it's not only enemies. See, I knew that was BS...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.15 20:49:00
|
2770. You make me sick - in General Discussions [original thread]
Endemmol wrote: There's probably hunfreds of terrible corp CEOs. Why should the gender of each matter? Wait. Did she kick you? Are you mad that a girl has authority? Because everything went so well when women got the vote.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.15 20:45:00
|
2771. vehicle spam in all game modes is getting ridiculous - in General Discussions [original thread]
General John Ripper wrote: being the only infantry soloing every objective is kinda lame. everyone on this game is a tanker tonight... +1 if you agree that vehicle spam is ridiculous It'll slow down when the weekend warriors have their fun a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.15 10:27:00
|
2772. Losing standing due to a loss - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Especially when there's very little to no friendly fire damage. Is this working as intended, or is it bugged? I dropped to level 1 with Caldari just from losing, and while I'll admit my memory is bugged, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.15 10:15:00
|
2773. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Atiim wrote: LMAO Really Dude? What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obvi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.15 10:07:00
|
2774. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. Do you not know how to read? I bet you'd be pretty angry if infantry had invisible claymore mines that didn't need to be ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 23:48:00
|
2775. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: LMAO Really Dude? What's next? You gonna complain about Proximity Explosives? You obviously didn't read. Remotes don't need to be manually detonated to destroy tanks now. You obviously don't consider that a problem even though y...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 23:45:00
|
2776. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything Dies wrote: ...still don't understand how tankers can keep up their whining now that they can dominate a battle in a fitting that costs less than many dropsuit builds. I love how you all complain that MLT is cheaper than PRO. What ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 23:43:00
|
2777. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch. Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tanker to squad with.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 23:26:00
|
2778. Losing standing due to a loss - in General Discussions [original thread]
Especially when there's very little to no friendly fire damage. Is this working as intended, or is it bugged? I dropped to level 1 with Caldari just from losing, and while I'll admit my memory is bugged, I remember reading that you'll lose standin...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 18:55:00
|
2779. AV Not so try hards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galvan Nized wrote: Av is really lacking right now. We need EWAR, webifiers and EMPs would be a great. Something besides just damage, because that just starts the buff Nerf cycle. Other aspects of AV need a nice buff. Proxies and remotes espe...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 18:52:00
|
2780. AV Not so try hards - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: AP Grasshopper wrote: Your not supposed to be able to kill a HAV with dropsuit AV while the hardeners are on. If you can't kill a HAV while the hardener is down then that's poor playing on your part. If you want to kill ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.14 18:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |