| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1881. [Request] Remove vehicle third person camera. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Soldier Sorajord wrote: Why shouldn't tanks be allowed to be 3rd person? Every other vehicle Does! Plus LAV's would be garbage in 3rd person as well. Also, navigating terrain would be poop. They can only see about the back of their vehicle. It...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 16:39:00
|
1882. [Request] Remove vehicle third person camera. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Ever tried to fly dropship in first-person? Maybe it should not apply to dropships. But Its a great idea for versimilitude for LAVs and tanks.
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 16:30:00
|
1883. [Request] Remove vehicle third person camera. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hi everyone at CCP. I would like tanks ability to use third person mode removed, since it: 1. Semi-Negates the use of scaner modules. 2. Is not realistic, theres no camera drones that you can shoot down above the tank. 4. Make turret turn speed s...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 16:23:00
|
1884. "active" SP boosters useless Don't buy them - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Nothin wrote: Active boosters simply multiply the number of skill points you receive at the end of each battle. As such, you are better off activating them when your pool of battle skill points is full (e.g. at the beginning of each weekly ...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 13:31:00
|
1885. Give blasters HMG like dispersion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beld Errmon wrote: It would be better to make infantry take less dmg from the blaster in general. This fits with EVE "physics", i.e. lower signature radius of infantry makes them harder to hit with full damage.
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 12:42:00
|
1886. Give blasters HMG like dispersion - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Large Blasters should have HMG like dispersion, making it so that they aren't pinpoint accurate. They stay deadly and infantry will still fear sticking their heads out when one is around, but it also won't be an insta kill win ...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 12:16:00
|
1887. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
GhostSoldierX wrote: @ CCP let us be able to Respec when we want like a option under character development tab: consequence for respc- you dont get your isk back from skill books This. Penalty will be proportional to how much SP you want to ...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 08:31:00
|
1888. It's almost like he's talking about Dust 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Angry Joe's top 10 Gaming Controversies of 2013 (#6) Should cash shops and paying for early access betas be the usual norm in the gaming industry? Did it truly help Dust 514 in the long run? Am I just bitter and probably trolli...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 08:12:00
|
1889. Hey CCP double check those numbers for 1.8 build - in General Discussions [original thread]
If a bug such as the 100% fuel injector happens in for example league of legends on the PC, the bugged champion is disabled immediately they get to know of the bug, they will have patched such a simple and obvious problem within the hour. For CCP...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.26 07:53:00
|
1890. HMG/Forge Heavy synergy with KB/M? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: I like to use the forge with my KB/M. I have also recently been doing ok with a KB/M using a HMG. I just wish KB/M controls were more optimised and not so damn sluggish. The small input lag is also frustrating. Honestly t...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 20:42:00
|
1891. HMG/Forge Heavy synergy with KB/M? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Minmatar heavy with kincats seems kind of cool. Too bad the strafe speed will still be unaffected by kincats.
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 20:05:00
|
1892. HMG/Forge Heavy synergy with KB/M? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hello, I am preparing myself for the infantry SP refund, and I am thinking about good roles that a KB/M player can have synergy with. I want to spec into something that is first of all fun to play with KB/M , but also useful in PC. I know that t...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 19:58:00
|
1893. So who can go against Scanner-beast? - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is what makes me unsure if I want to spec into caldari commando or if im going gallente scout in 1.8. I have the dragonfly scout BPO. Gal scout with 72 m range and RR with SMG sidearm and 2 equipment. You dont need a cloak TBH. Just run up...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 10:53:00
|
1894. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Western Ways wrote: I think people need to stop worrying about what other people are rolling and just enjoy the ufckin game, and if you notice that somethings OP just call it out like you already do and let CCP do their thing. I've never been...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 10:20:00
|
1895. *Strokes nerf bat in preparation for 1.8* - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: The answer is... NERF BAT! The nerf bat is OP, it needs to be nerfed. Seriously, look what it did to the laser rifle, breach AR, tac AR, AV, flaylock pistol, etc. The problem is that you can't use nerf bat to nerf ...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 09:38:00
|
1896. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Crimson ShieId wrote: ...seeing huge amounts of FoTM fittings after a respec... Well, if items stay OP for a long time (which is the REAL FOTM PROBLEM) players will just grind SP to get that ...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 08:27:00
|
1897. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crimson ShieId wrote: ...seeing huge amounts of FoTM fittings after a respec... Well, if items stay OP for a long time (which is the REAL FOTM PROBLEM) players will just grind SP to get that OP sh*t. Increase in FOTM builts might be correla...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 07:59:00
|
1898. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: i lvoe these complaints abotu re-specs. when you get to my expericence and skillpoitn levle....thier just not worth it. sicne i can practially do everything i want to do. soif theres a respec i get skillpoints to go so...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 07:51:00
|
1899. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Asher Night wrote: Question for all of you who do not want CCP to give a respec: Will that ruin the game for YOU? Will you stop playing because someone else was given a respec to fix their character that CCP drastically changed? Will you delete...
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 07:49:00
|
1900. *Strokes nerf bat in preparation for 1.8* - in General Discussions [original thread]
*Strokes Cat Merc* Eww, why is there clone goo all over this cat?
- by Spectral Clone - at 2014.02.25 07:45:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |