| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. [Request] Rise of the (proto) heavy - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Give me another weapon slot!, is that a little too much? lol
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 21:37:00
|
102. Feedback: Ammo in vehicles and installations - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like to think tanks have built in nanohives.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 21:35:00
|
103. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Tex Mex Aztec wrote: Tangents, man, tangents. yes I'll admit you got me but let's go back to the fact the free LAVs break the rule that if you die you lose it so why shouldn't that go for the LAVs I could use starter ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:35:00
|
104. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 2. uhh no never. 3. that's a single negative last i checked 1 /= 2 Surviving = not going boom. two negatives don't automatically multiply Anyway, I don't give a **** As for 2. I ask my teacher if I can go to the ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:23:00
|
105. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 3. "And surviving isn't enough of an incentive?" 2. uhh no never. 3. that's a single negative last i checked 1 /= 2 Surviving = not going boom. two negatives don't automatically multiply Anyway, I don't give a ****
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:17:00
|
106. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: And not instantly going boom isn't enough of an incentive? Yes it was a double negative But double negatives are acceptable when they are needed to emphasize something "And surviving isn't ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:08:00
|
107. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
That wasn't a double negative.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:57:00
|
108. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: who says I don't jump out? They blow up if left alone after a while, and according to Jax they should not be disposable. and all vehicles have that blow up thing even t...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:52:00
|
109. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: A dedicated driver also wouldn't be using the free one in the first place We won't ever have dedicated drivers if there is no need to protect a free vehicle And not instantly going boom isn't enough o...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:50:00
|
110. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: who says I don't jump out? They blow up if left alone after a while, and according to Jax they should not be disposable.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:46:00
|
111. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: what's to say that a dedicated LAV driver won't stay with his LAV The fact that they go boom so easily, that's why they need a buff. A dedicated driver also wouldn't be using the free one in the first place, you're only ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:39:00
|
112. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: I generally use them as transport/evac for my squad getting them where they need to go and should it be too hot GTFO as well as the gunner sprays plasma at the hostiles. good times have been had doing that Yeah, but ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:32:00
|
113. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone. Hmm I believe we have gotten off ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:20:00
|
114. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone. Hmm I believe we have gotten off topic... but nonetheless why should we bot...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:09:00
|
115. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:03:00
|
116. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 2. Same with tanks and dropships! It should extend to them too!
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:57:00
|
117. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Almost every dropship pilot would disagree. with... need details okay? Sloth9230 wrote: Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: There should also be a way to lock vehicles so no one steal t...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:52:00
|
118. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: There should also be a way to lock vehicles so no one steal them. yeah that needs to go on a different topic Why? These are all reasons why removing free LAVs is a bad idea.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:46:00
|
119. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: I'm sorry but you honestly believe dropships should be given points for flying I could hover on one side of the map and just farm points I was thinking for dropships the MCRU should give points and maybe you could give fine...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:45:00
|
120. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There should also be a way to lock vehicles so no one steal them.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |