| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
801. Why amarr scout sucks... - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's too slow. Armor plate penalty is heavy. So it has to use feroscales =lower HP Low armor regen ability. You can shield tank to increase HP but it has a bonus to Precision and it'd be a waste to not put precision amps The scan range for scou...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.01 20:47:00
|
802. Why is the Minja the only one? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Ganja was the term used by some folks on the registry a while back. ganja or ginja
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.01 20:42:00
|
803. 'Black Eagle' Assault Rifle Day Of Christmas - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Flint Beastgood III wrote: Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui wrote: I wish they would have given the suit some extra slots but kept the CPU / PG to a minimum and made that the gift . That woulda been real nice....
- by Sir Dukey - at 2015.01.01 17:39:00
|
804. CCP what did you do to Blasters? -_- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Sorry man. I actually got the respect and got out of Gallente Vehicles and Logistics with it. Went back to Logistics after they finally made it not suck complete **** but the Gallente Vehicles and turrets are still trash. No...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 06:10:00
|
805. CCP what did you do to Blasters? -_- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vicious Minotaur wrote: Blasters are lame, just like vehicles. Blasters, as per CCPs last known design choice, are SUPPOSED TO be for anti-vehicle work. If you thought you could roll up to infantry and murder them via unloading your stupid, po...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 06:07:00
|
806. CCP what did you do to Blasters? -_- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Assert Dominance III wrote: i bought a respec and decided to go back into tanking since its been a while (chrome) since i used them. i got a madrugar with blasters and my god, the bullets the this thing shoots are non exi...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 06:06:00
|
807. Vehicle and AV combat need to slow down - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Right now everything is too high damage and things happen too fast for both AV players and vehicle players. Right now vehicles tend to destroy infantry really fast yet conversely they tend to get ripped apart by AV really f...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 06:02:00
|
808. Are snipers weak? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Geo Esp wrote: gustavo acosta wrote: No, but they're not ridiculous or anything. How often do you see them in PC? I don't play PC and was just wondering if corps even use them Never.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 05:59:00
|
809. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Quote: ="Sir Dukey"Thanks for the novel. Hope it get's published. Fixed some mistakes. Anyway, just to be clear, no where does it say the blaster turret is for AV. The turret was originally meant for AI. Go ahead an...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 03:52:00
|
810. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: to be fair, the goddamned heavy blaster turret dispersion needs to be SEVERELY toned down. When HAV pilots are bitching abou...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.30 01:58:00
|
811. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: The main gun is not for killing infantry. What part of that do you guys not understand??? If you want to kill infantry and have AV capability w...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 23:06:00
|
812. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: The main gun is not for killing infantry. What part of that do you guys not understand??? If you want to kill infantry and have AV capability with your tank fit small turrets. Small turre...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 22:52:00
|
813. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: The main gun is not for killing infantry. What part of that do you guys not understand??? If you want to kill infantry and have AV capability with your tank fit small turrets. Small turrets need a buff, and madrugars need a fit...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 21:44:00
|
814. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: The vehicles you all are using are STD's being balanced around PROTO AV. It's time CCP started releasing the missing vehicles and doing the real balances. Vehicles aren't STD-ADV-PRO They are STD-Specialized.
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 21:28:00
|
815. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Toobar Zoobar wrote: TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: Toobar Zoobar wrote: Bahirae Serugiusu wrote: BE CAREFUL FOR ONCE!!! Vehicles aren't meant to be a one man army! Team mates are usually pretty dang good at killing Commandos and Forge Gunners...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 21:21:00
|
816. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: to be fair, the goddamned heavy blaster turret dispersion needs to be SEVERELY toned down. When HAV pilots are bitching about not being able to hit idiots at ten meters they...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 20:08:00
|
817. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: If you lose a protosuit to a militia player, get gud. Does my quafe suit with nothing but militia weapons and fittings count? Does this mean when I kill proto nerds it automatically means they're ba...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 20:03:00
|
818. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: to be fair, the goddamned heavy blaster turret dispersion needs to be SEVERELY toned down. When HAV pilots are bitching about not being able to hit idiots at ten meters they aren't exaggerating even slightly. My poor madr...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 19:52:00
|
819. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: I was going to read this from the side-lines, but I'll clarify two things: First, 80GJ Blasters were nerfed because they were never supposed to be an AP weapon , yet they were amongst the most effective AP weapons in the game. As...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 19:48:00
|
820. Vehicles are useless and irrelevent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I love how idiot tank drivers only consider the cost of the weapon in SP/ISK. Every time youdo that I'm going to start comparing the cost of my weapon to the cost of your turret...
- by Sir Dukey - at 2014.12.29 19:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |