| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
261. New LAVs are Old LAV of days long past. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: The "new" LAV's are just going to be rolling coffins. Even if you fit them properly they will just die way too easy. A increase in module slots is required. Cause according to rattati only the "unfit...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.10 00:35:00
|
262. New LAVs are Old LAV of days long past. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: The Circle of vehicle balance continues and this time we return to the topic of LAVs. In the Past, LAVs had very little eHP but made up for that with mobility and versatility; they also cost a good a...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 21:43:00
|
263. Dissecting the Assault role and it's bonuses. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: How is that stupid? It means you are able to apply more damage over a shorter timeframe, emptying an entire mag on someone in less than 3 seconds is a huge advantage when close to someone. Also the firs...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 18:27:00
|
264. Dissecting the Assault role and it's bonuses. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer I'm not sure how you're not understanding that High RoF means being able to apply damage faster? Regardless of your views on it I'm not sure your grasping what Echo is saying. Think of it as a drag race, you may say that the AR has a grea...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 18:23:00
|
265. New LAVs are Old LAV of days long past. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Stefan Stahl wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: We just need our exrta high and lowslot back. I'd like to wait-and-see first. Generally, more slots is better for fitting variety - on the other hand I don't think LAVs need to be much more powerful tha...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 16:57:00
|
266. New LAVs are Old LAV of days long past. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Circle of vehicle balance continues and this time we return to the topic of LAVs. In the Past, LAVs had very little eHP but made up for that with mobility and versatility; they also cost a good amount of ISK, a little too much for what it w...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 16:47:00
|
267. RIP LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: In case you haven't noticed, you won't be able to make a decent Methana fit. Even using max skills, it's impossible to even get back to its previous ehp and fit a repairer and a decent turret. Unless you want to argue tha...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 16:34:00
|
268. Dissecting the Assault role and it's bonuses. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
With the addition to the bonuses the vanilla weapons become skewed in performance; some stepping into another weapons territory and some are left others sitting on its fingers. The Plasma Rifle already has easy handling, the low recoil plasma ri...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 05:09:00
|
269. Dissecting the Assault role and it's bonuses. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
In this thread I will discuss the problems I'm seeing with Assault Bonuses. The thread will not only address the lusterless Caldari and Gallente bonuses but also the Minmatar and Amarr bonuses. A quick note, I have high a high SP Minmatar and C...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.09 05:09:00
|
270. Assault HMG viable AV? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
GENERAL FCF wrote: Where is the thread that confirms this change to the Assault HMG?! Is it officially announced? Hotfix echo numbers thread in feedback section. I am also still laughing at the fact that he said small arms weapons do damage ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.08 16:40:00
|
271. Faction Warfare Ranks( Give us another chance Rattati!) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm not afraid to say that I like Clannad....
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.08 06:22:00
|
272. RIP LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bright Cloud wrote: Its just stupid. Av grenade count goes back up to 3 while LAV's are getting their HP cut in half. Even with the added fitting bonus we will never get over it then pre nerf. With 3 AV grenades there is no excuse to not be aib...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.07 02:20:00
|
273. RIP LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Booby Tuesdays wrote: Yep. Unfit LAVs (especially Sagas) will pop from any of the following. 1 Volley of Swarms 1 Blast from a Forge Gun 1 AV Grenade 1 Proxy Mine 1 Flux Grenade + Breach Mass Driver round 1 Assaul...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.07 01:12:00
|
274. Good bonuses for Cal/Gal - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Fizzer XCIV wrote: Tectonic Fusion wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Cal: reduction to recoil Gal: Reduction to ferroscale speed penalty (just as useful as the one we have now!) The one we have now makes the TAR godlike. A lot of strict Ga...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.06 03:08:00
|
275. Sticky:[Feedback] Hotfix Echo - Narrative and Numbers - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Doc DDD wrote: Mostly excited for the patch as it has potential.. Have same concerns as a few others. Scrambler buff... Ok so no one in thier right mind runs shield fits as Armor>Shields... so lets buff the anti shiel...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.06 02:41:00
|
276. Myofibril stimulants( PLEASE in the name of CCP READ) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I just want HMGs as a small turret on vehicles....
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.05 22:38:00
|
277. Sticky:[Feedback] Normalization of AV Damage Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Are you guys under the assumption that the shield variants would have the same base damage as the normal variant? No that's obviously terrible. The correct thing to do which I thought was obvious is to ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.05 21:06:00
|
278. Sticky:[Feedback] Normalization of AV Damage Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Are you guys under the assumption that the shield variants would have the same base damage as the normal variant? No that's obviously terrible. The correct thing to do which I thought was obvious is to adjust damage accordingly to the damage pro...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.05 20:53:00
|
279. Sticky:[Feedback] Normalization of AV Damage Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: What the ****?! Ratatti are you serious? Add a swarm launcher variant that rips shields apart like a hot knfie goes trough butter? We do not want to impr...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.05 20:14:00
|
280. Sticky:[Feedback] Normalization of AV Damage Profiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: So you would want to swap to a shield swarm and back to an armor swarm as AV infantry? Yes, because that's what this game is all about. For every action you do there are positive and negative consequences. If I choos...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.03.05 19:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |