| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
141. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the cha...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 01:46:00
|
142. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Ld Collins wrote: I don't think there is a problem with turrets atm they seem fine I'm sure the other variants will be back when they are ready. I think it will be proto lvl tanks that take advantage of t...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 01:13:00
|
143. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed are extreme enough one wa...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 01:05:00
|
144. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top end Anti Vehicle weapons. ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 01:01:00
|
145. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed are extreme enough one way or another. Let's say we have 5 variables...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:36:00
|
146. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top end Anti Vehicle weapons. Put Anti Infantry and Infantry Support in t...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:23:00
|
147. it is long past time - in General Discussions [original thread]
message from Godin: A ****** PVE at that.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:18:00
|
148. Ion pistol looks pointless and UP - in General Discussions [original thread]
message from Godin: I personally think it needs a ROF buff, but I'll still use it.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:17:00
|
149. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% track...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:09:00
|
150. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: @^ blasters smoke tanks. Unless the pilot is using a damage modded rail, or missile period, in which case, no they don't.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.29 00:09:00
|
151. Make militia tanks standard - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd rather see them removed for nerfed. message from Godin: ^this
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:55:00
|
152. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
mesage from Godin: immoria+¦o dr+ínons
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:53:00
|
153. We need a name!? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Valhalleers or Valhallians. Warriors that died in battle go to Valhalla and life forever, we're immortal and warriors that had to die to become immortal. EDIT: Since our tech is from Sleepers, perhaps we can be cal...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:49:00
|
154. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction(maybe more if needed, a...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:36:00
|
155. [1.8 Skills] NEW, Easy-To-Understand Format! (Logi/Assault/Sentinel) - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol, Gal Logi can't scan me down even with cloak off.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:18:00
|
156. Should I come back to dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The second one EDIT: message from Godin: You'll suffer less if you just leave
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:04:00
|
157. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction(maybe more if needed, and a 25% ROF reduction, but a damage boost ...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 23:01:00
|
158. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: There is a post buy a dev somewhere about the RE sticking to lavs/tanks etc is a unintended flaw in the programming message from Godin Thank ******* god
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 22:46:00
|
159. Just want to point this out - in General Discussions [original thread]
darkiller240 wrote: make piloting cheap, simple message from Godin: Explain yourself.
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 22:45:00
|
160. MAV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
message from Godin: overview: Squad supporting vehicle, being able to carry around a full squad while being able to support them afterwards in some way tech 1- tech one should be the general hull to use for squad support. They should get a medi...
- by Roger Cordill - at 2014.01.28 22:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |