| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
4041. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: This whole path I get down with forum users where inevitably they try to assert **** like this gets so old. Seriously. I guess I haven't said it enough... I'm willing be wrong, I just don't believe I am. I would love some ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 19:15:00
|
4042. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Apothecary Za'ki wrote: you mean lower the ROF.. i would say no to scope removal as CR is the precision rifle where as the ACR is the BRRRRRAP! u dead MF.. gun of choice for most people who spray and pray. Fair enough. I was't going to say tha...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 19:00:00
|
4043. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: Ahhh, yeah anecdotal assertions of "this is what i see so it's OP" I thought we learned about this back when Buster Friendly tried doing this.... Welp, this thread can officially be trashed. Logical: "We should get data ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 18:52:00
|
4044. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Quantity does not equate to quality. Not only that, but of course you'd have weapons with heavy Anti-Armor bias (+15%) be used more than others in an environment where more players use Armor than Shield. There's no need to prove ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 18:46:00
|
4045. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: Where is it 'overperforming'? Can you give me recent data that demonstrates that? The top weapons in my killfeed are the HMG and CR, in that order. Ask Rattati for a wider sample size. Prove me wrong
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 18:38:00
|
4046. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
John ShepardIII wrote: -_- you're useless Take that back, I spot your vs. you're errors very well, thank you very much.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 17:54:00
|
4047. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zatara Rought wrote: How about you tell me what buff it should receive if you're going to give it "a balancing mechanic" N/a Buffing a weapon that is already overperforming is silly
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 17:50:00
|
4048. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Because breach AR. The BAR is a weird, thuggish version of the AR that I believe needs a tweak too. It doesn't need a weakness, like the CR, it needs to have it's range examined.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 16:16:00
|
4049. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bright Steel wrote: Clip size??? Compared to what? You can only engage one and a half enemies per clip!!! That's why the CR philosophy of ALWAYS RELOAD is so important. And a side arm is a must. CR clip size (non-assault): 54 AR clip size:...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 16:09:00
|
4050. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bright Steel wrote: BOY, I will... Well I will do something That's why I always spec CR It's suppose to be tactical. Then we need a 'Tactical' variant of the CR It's too good at too many things right now. Respectable damage and range, ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 15:45:00
|
4051. shotgun scouts, i dare you to reply ratatti - in General Discussions [original thread]
The SG weapon itself doesn't appear to be OP. It has a very limited range. It's the ability of cloaked up scouts to get in that limit range incredibly quickly, and without being noticed, that makes the SG overperform.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 15:43:00
|
4052. the proper way to balance the scrambler rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
The ScR and its variants aren't in a bad place. As laser weapons they deal significantly less damage to armor, since armor remains the currently metagame go-to, lasers aren't exactly killing people in droves.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 15:40:00
|
4053. Who else would like to change their in-game name - in General Discussions [original thread]
Your name is your reputation in New Eden. Names have histories, they tell others of your successes and failures. Being able to change your name in-game is basically like a "Reputation Respec". I'm against this. If you wanted to have a proper nam...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 15:05:00
|
4054. small requests regarding restocking fits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
"Restock to:" would be so so so nice. To expand upon that idea, a post-match "restock to starting values" button would be incredible.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:59:00
|
4055. CR Balance Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blueprint For Murder wrote: The CR is the only weapon without a balance mechanic I was wondering if any of you have any ideas. Increase the time between "bursts" of rounds. Remove the scope.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:57:00
|
4056. What's my age again - in General Discussions [original thread]
27, married, working full time job and all that.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:54:00
|
4057. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I see you posted these preliminary numbers and I think this would be a better set of numbers Also, I see the Commandos' scan precision is 60dB. I think this would be better if it were 55dB. The commando fulfills a similar ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:25:00
|
4058. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jebus McKing wrote: I'm sorry that you are disappoint. I did my very best. Please, stop shouting. *lies down, tries not to cry, cries a lot* /me glares at Rattati... LOOK WHAT YOU DID! You are tearing this family apart!
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 14:14:00
|
4059. Can we please do something about this. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know who decided to give scouts a second equipment slot, but I am almost certain they were tripping balls at the time. Oh well... /me cloaks to stalk people silly enough to fit assault dropsuits, then drops an uplink for bonus WPs.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 13:55:00
|
4060. Sticky:[Feedback] EWAR Concentric Circle Scan Falloff Design - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: "I see you posted these preliminary numbers and I think this would be a better set of numbers" Okay then I see you posted that the assault scan range is going to be 10m. I think this would be better if it was made 15m. 10m...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.11.17 13:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |