| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3821. What do you people thinking about the removal of directional viewing... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: As a low eHP shotgun scout, I feel hurt. I rely on that a bit to see if a target is facing away from me, or if I'll run in into a wall of fire to only end up in the spawn screen 5 seconds later. I think that's kind of the poin...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.04 14:11:00
|
3822. Do something (anything) about FW queue times - in General Discussions [original thread]
FW queue times are direct result of poor rewards. Giving the losing side a tiny standing bump will help remedy this. I'll just leave this here .
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.04 13:39:00
|
3823. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
15 miles! In the snow! Both ways! Also, who else thinks these ranks need to be tied to another bonus? Like a title or special proto dropsuit you can only buy, and fit, if you are X rank or above.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 23:58:00
|
3824. Uprising 1.10? Yeah right... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Version numbers, how do they work?
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 23:54:00
|
3825. $10 bet. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Welcome back Aeon. CCP has been putting more effort into Dust 514 recently. With such a lean dev team working on two games is a terrible use of resources. My guess is Legion is on ice for an indeterminate amount of time.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 23:48:00
|
3826. Uplinks and Bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
You should only worry about bandwidth if you are a logi tourist who swaps fittings so you can farm WP's in a sentinel or SG scout fitting
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 23:39:00
|
3827. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dreis Shadowweaver wrote: But the amount of grind needed to get a high standing is just ridiculous. It needs to be reduced. Do you know a single person with level 10 standings in a faction? Just 1 person? I don't. Me neither. CCP might be abl...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 20:35:00
|
3828. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dreis Shadowweaver wrote: Ok, fair point. How about +150 for a win, +75 for a loss? I feel that +75 as a win isn't enough, but +15 for a loss? Come on, might as well be nothing! IMO, if you fight for a faction, you should receive similar standi...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 20:15:00
|
3829. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Dreis Shadowweaver wrote: Keep LP payouts the same, but bump standings increase to +150 regardless of whether you win or lose. Also, bump standings loss for fighting for the opposite alliance (Min and Gal/Amarr and Cal) to, like, -300 or someth...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 19:47:00
|
3830. FW LP for lost matches too low - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll just leave this here...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 19:30:00
|
3831. Question on 1.10 orbitals. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dreis Shadowweaver wrote: He just meant OB's. Didn't they used to be called Warbarge Strikes? Back in 1.7 they changed the name to warbarge strikes. Link wrote: Warbarge - Precision Strikes have been renamed to Warbarge Strikes
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 18:14:00
|
3832. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kaeru Nayiri wrote: I am more of the opinion that facwar needs to be, and stay, harsh. I would hate to see it watered down any more than it already is. Let's pretend that we go with John's suggestion of 15 standing per loss... that means you ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 18:07:00
|
3833. [REQUEST] BUFF TURRETS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: /me blows both of them up solo /me 360 no scopes you from another map.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 18:02:00
|
3834. [REQUEST] BUFF TURRETS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Vehicles are USELESS. /me watches ADS perform strafing runs on an objective, successfully keeping redberries away even though they control the ground. /me watches HAV provide mobile cover to a fire team while they ad...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 17:48:00
|
3835. Question on 1.10 orbitals. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Create a squad, lock it, solo warbarge strikes.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 17:19:00
|
3836. FacWar reputation - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: 25 sounds a little too high, maybe 10-15. Otherwise I completely agree. I went with 1/3 of the standing increase of a win. Anything higher than 0 is an improvement
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 16:54:00
|
3837. Overused Gëá Overpowered - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Yet, people using the Breach AR tend to get very similar K/D's to people using the Tactical Assault Rifle and Burst Assault Rifle. Where are you getting this information? Has CCP posted the average K/D's for the AR and it'...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 16:22:00
|
3838. Who Pushed For Bandwidth? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bandwidth prevents role tourists from spawning in a logi fitting to spam deployables, then swap to an HMG sentinel and go 30-0 while racking in thousands of WP's from uplink spam. Love bandwidth. I welcome this change with open arms. [Didn't rea...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 15:14:00
|
3839. Next Update naming contest! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seems like a lot of the EPIC features on the roadmap focus on PC so... Dust 514: Conquest Dust 514: Planetfall
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 15:12:00
|
3840. Best Apex BPO Assault? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Amarr 'Opus' is a close second to the Gallente 'Spartan'. All of them have sub-optimal fittings so picking the "best of the worst" is hard. The Amarr has that uplink, which is nice for extra WP's and when blueberries ******* refuse to drop upl...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.03 15:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |