| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
881. Why everyone hates DUST 514? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: RayRay James wrote: what change has made the game "unplayable"? or are you talking about your narrow playstyle being changed and it mad you sad? Speed hackers, FG users, passive ewar runners, and speed tanke...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.21 14:15:00
|
882. Why everyone hates DUST 514? - in General Discussions [original thread]
dalt ud wrote: soulreaper73 wrote: you like dust, then play dust. you don't like dust, then don't play dust. beauty is in the eye of the beholder. We will see how you will talk about "don't play dust" when CCP will make changes, and that...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.21 13:51:00
|
883. Why everyone hates DUST 514? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Finn Colman wrote: GLOBAL RAGE wrote: FPS players want 75ms latency at the most and 60 frames at least. DUST514 is no where near, actually in another galaxy, accomplishing anything close to a competitive shooter. In fact it favors players w...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.21 13:49:00
|
884. Planetary Conquest is a rich corps game. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Enki Kalgarian wrote: Planetary Conquest is a game mode that rich corps own there is really no way a new corp or corps that don't have the kind of Isk in there corp banks maybe I'm wrong but if you are a corp that can tell me how Please.We were...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.18 18:58:00
|
885. the scariest thing for eve players. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: So you want to be able to take control of something in 20minutes that it took someone billions of ISK and months to build? It can be destroyed in less time, why would it matter how the player loses it?
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.18 18:45:00
|
886. What do you really want from dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: I WANT THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yeah, not gonna lie, that was such a sick trailer. Of course, if there's one thing CCP is actually really good at, it's trailers. Now, if they could get the g...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.18 16:18:00
|
887. You know the logi class is broken when.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm a logi. I can heal. I love playing my logi gear, I just wish my proto suit wasn't so damn expensive.
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.18 12:51:00
|
888. anyone actually use precision enhancers on non scouts? - in General Discussions [original thread]
My proto gal logi has a complex precision and complex range on it. It might not pick up everything, but it does help me see a lot more, with which I can than blap the active scanner and show my team mates where the hostiles are.
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.18 12:36:00
|
889. Full Respec in 2.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Garrett Blacknova wrote: And I'm giving you another like just based on the fact that someone tried attacking you based on your like count. That's 6 more likes today! I'M ON A ROLL!!!!
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 20:29:00
|
890. If You are a loyalist... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: I'm only specced into Gallente suits. I've never skilled into anything Amarr except uplinks, even though I have all the templar BPOs. I use the Rail Rifle on my Gal Scout because it's hybrid, but the shotgun and AR are ful...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 19:58:00
|
891. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: What's wrong with using whats given to you to start, and then making the choice to continue using that because you've skiled into it, or changing it up and skilling into something else? You keep talkin...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 18:45:00
|
892. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: I have SP in weapons all over the board to 1 to try them out, some I trained farther (forge guns, remote explosives), some stopped at 1 (MD, RR, ScR) because I don't enjoy them. I don't consider ANY of...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 17:50:00
|
893. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: Then what exactly is the argument?/quote] We shouldn't be locked out of a portion of out SP because CCP couldn't be bothered to launch with a complete weapon list. [quote=RayRay James]Also, new conte...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 17:10:00
|
894. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: They released everything they had planned at 1.0, there was no "missing" content. Hardly... But I have a feeling you aren't going to be swayed by anything I say anyway. If you have read my posts in...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 17:06:00
|
895. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Generating more SP to skill into weapons that now exist isn't the issue. We've already established that getting into a prototype weapon isn't difficult. That isn't the argument here. Then what exactly is the argument? ...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 16:50:00
|
896. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: You claim you'll stop once racial parity exists among the weapons. What happens when they add a t2 amarr weapon or add additional weapons that aren't even part of the scope right now? When/if CCP ad...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 16:38:00
|
897. Respecs are needed in 2.0 (next evolution of dust) - in General Discussions [original thread]
arimal lavaren wrote: Are these forums even moderated any more? Doesn't look like it. Also doesn't look like anyone skims even the first page before posting their own bulls#it posts either
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 16:33:00
|
898. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: It is not the players' fault that CCP did not have a complete weapon list in Uprising 1.0. When we have full racial weapon parity CCP would do well to refund the SP in the weaponry tree. NO! I was against the suit re...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 16:22:00
|
899. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: I went to college for engineering then broadcasting, I don't work in either of those fields now. Should the college give me back all my money for my time there because I couldn't find a job in either f...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 14:32:00
|
900. There should be a yearly full respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: RayRay James wrote: Live with your choices Some choices were made for players. E.g. players who wanted a Caldari rifle in 1.0 didn't have the option. They could either sit on their SP until 1.7 (how fun is that?!) or s...
- by RayRay James - at 2014.04.17 14:07:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |