Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
2660
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 14:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
No, just.. no.
Annual respecs, pay to win respecs, "my mommy says I'm speshul so I deserve a respec" respecs, are all stupid stupid ideas and you should feel stupid for having them.
"The line between disorder and order lies in logistics" -Sun Tzu
Forum Warrior lv.2
Amarr victor!
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 14:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:I went to college for engineering then broadcasting, I don't work in either of those fields now. Should the college give me back all my money for my time there because I couldn't find a job in either field? If so, how do they go about removing my knowledge on those subjects from my brain?
We're immortal mercenaries that have our consciousnesses stored digitally... We utilize micro-wormholes to instantly teleport into battle... We keep banks of genetically blank clone bodies in storage...
Please don't compare the real-world with a futuristic sci-fi setting. You aren't comparing apples to apples and you just end up looking silly.
RayRay James wrote:The AR isn't dead, you can still use it. It has it's place.
Whether the AR is useless, useful, or "dead" is not the question. CCP did not have a full weapon list on launch so players skilled into whatever was available at the time. Don't muddy the issue.
RayRay James wrote:As to the point of the time it takes, so effing what? It takes what, a week or two to get to proto weapon, 2 -3 for a suit?
The time is takes to skill into a prototype weapon is one argument for a refund... it isn't the strongest argument, which is probably why you choose to focus on it instead of the more viable arguments
CCP lead us to believe that X, Y, and Z weapons were available Uprising 1.0. They didn't even hint at weapons A through W being released, or when they would be released. Because of that players specced into the weapons we had available to us at the time. Not because they fit our playstyles, or because we thought they would be great FotM weapons.
I know I wouldn't have put a single SP into the SMG if I had the magsec SMG available to me... And I even own an SMG BPO.
RayRay James wrote:Really? F#cking instant gratification people, you're ruining everything because you cant have what you want RIGHT NOW!
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 14:32:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:I went to college for engineering then broadcasting, I don't work in either of those fields now. Should the college give me back all my money for my time there because I couldn't find a job in either field? If so, how do they go about removing my knowledge on those subjects from my brain? We're immortal mercenaries that have our consciousnesses stored digitally... We utilize micro-wormholes to instantly teleport into battle... We keep banks of genetically blank clone bodies in storage... Please don't compare the real-world with a futuristic sci-fi setting. You aren't comparing apples to apples and you just end up looking silly. RayRay James wrote:The AR isn't dead, you can still use it. It has it's place. Whether the AR is useless, useful, or "dead" is not the question. CCP did not have a full weapon list on launch so players skilled into whatever was available at the time. Don't muddy the issue. RayRay James wrote:As to the point of the time it takes, so effing what? It takes what, a week or two to get to proto weapon, 2 -3 for a suit? The time is takes to skill into a prototype weapon is one argument for a refund... it isn't the strongest argument, which is probably why you choose to focus on it instead of the more viable arguments CCP lead us to believe that X, Y, and Z weapons were available Uprising 1.0. They didn't even hint at weapons A through W being released, or when they would be released. Because of that players specced into the weapons we had available to us at the time. Not because they fit our playstyles, or because we thought they would be great FotM weapons. I know I wouldn't have put a single SP into the SMG if I had the magsec SMG available to me... And I even own an SMG BPO. RayRay James wrote:Really? F#cking instant gratification people, you're ruining everything because you cant have what you want RIGHT NOW!
I'm not going to attack everything here, just two parts
Let's say CCP does let you have all your weapon SP back. Then in 2 months they buff/nerf everything again and the AR can shoot 200 M for 1000 dmg per shot, are you going to whine then that you don't have your SP in AR still?
As for the additional weapons, are you going to want a respec every time they add something? If so, just leave Dust now, because CCP are always going to add/remove/change/nerf/buff this game |
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
3946
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 14:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
.
No.
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 14:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:Let's say CCP does let you have all your weapon SP back. Then in 2 months they buff/nerf everything again and the AR can shoot 200 M for 1000 dmg per shot, are you going to whine then that you don't have your SP in AR still
CCP could give the AR a 100m optimal range, 2.0m splash, and 300 round clips. I would not use it again. I want to use Caldari and Amarr weaponry. Call it roleplaying, or just being stubborn; that's just how I play.
RayRay James wrote:As for the additional weapons, are you going to want a respec every time they add something?
No, just when they have racial weapon parity.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
864
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:05:00 -
[36] - Quote
No. No more respecs. CCP gave you a dropsuit command respec when all dropsuits were released. Now, most suits are out. Many weapons are out (but there will ALWAYS be new ones added--deal with it).
The time for respecs is over.
>> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! <<
|
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
864
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:like choosing the role you want with absolute certainty, then CCP changing it in 8 months' time, rewriting the bonuses for most things, and finding out you're getting back a fraction of the SP you've spent, rather than everything so you can reevaluate what you want. This is the biggest line of horseshit in this thread. CCP didn't fundamentally change the roles. Your logi still does logistics. Your heavy suit still shoots the HMG. Your scanner still scans. Don't spew this garbage that now your world is turned upside down. Oh damn, you won't have things that are overpowered anymore. Deal with it.
>> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! <<
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Vespasian Andendare wrote:CCP gave you a dropsuit command respec when all dropsuits were released.
The logic behind the SP refund for Dropsuit Command was that players skilled into dropsuits before the entire line-up of dropsuits was available.
That same logic can be applied to weapons, you realize that right?
Hypothetically, a player creates his merc on launch day. He wants an automatic sidearm so naturally he skills into the SMG because that was the only automatic sidearm available to him on launch.
Fast forward to 1.8...
This player now has the magsec SMG available to him; his playstyle favors the magsec's range more than the SMG's extended clip and higher RoF. Sucks to be him right? The hundreds of thousands of SP he devoted to the SMG aren't going to do him any good now that he has the weapon he's wanted all along: the magsec SMG.
It is not the players' fault that CCP did not have a complete weapon list in Uprising 1.0. When we have full racial weapon parity CCP would do well to refund the SP in the weaponry tree.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
80
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:22:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:
It is not the players' fault that CCP did not have a complete weapon list in Uprising 1.0. When we have full racial weapon parity CCP would do well to refund the SP in the weaponry tree.
NO!
I was against the suit refund but I understand why they did it. The only way I believe you will ever be happy is if you get a respec every time anything is added. I know what you are saying, I don't believe it to be the truth.
You claim you'll stop once racial parity exists among the weapons. What happens when they add a t2 amarr weapon or add additional weapons that aren't even part of the scope right now? Should CCP stop developing weapons once there is one racial weapon of each type, because by your logic, if CCP were to add a weapon to gallente that no one else has, you should get another respec.
|
Enji Elric
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
213
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:26:00 -
[40] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:MINA Longstrike wrote:No. Choices have consequences, don't spend your SP on stuff you aren't sure about. Stuff we aren't sure about, like choosing the role you want with absolute certainty, then CCP changing it in 8 months' time, rewriting the bonuses for most things, and finding out you're getting back a fraction of the SP you've spent, rather than everything so you can reevaluate what you want. That's not a player mistake. That's a developer changing everything, which deserves a full respec. People like you are the reason we can't have nice things. A hypothetical: CCP: "We're taking out the scanners for a month to rework them, they WILL be back in one month's time." Forums: "Okay, can we have the SP back?" People like you: "No, you made a choice, accept the consequences." CPM: "Whatever, we don't care." Just like they said they were removing the Sagaris and Surya for rework, and we haven't heard a peep from CCP about them.
perfect example. I deploy, Was spec'd into tanks a bit.... I first thought, Man can't wait to spend that passive sp and use all those BO tanks that i've salvaged...
look at skill tree....
facepalm...
put controller down and walk away for 4 days.
|
|
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
865
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:27:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Vespasian Andendare wrote:CCP gave you a dropsuit command respec when all dropsuits were released. The logic behind the SP refund for Dropsuit Command was that players skilled into dropsuits before the entire line-up of dropsuits was available. That same logic can be applied to weapons, you realize that right? Hypothetically, a player creates his merc on launch day. He wants an automatic sidearm so naturally he skills into the SMG because that was the only automatic sidearm available to him on launch. Fast forward to 1.8... This player now has the magsec SMG available to him; his playstyle favors the magsec's range more than the SMG's extended clip and higher RoF. Sucks to be him right? The hundreds of thousands of SP he devoted to the SMG aren't going to do him any good now that he has the weapon he's wanted all along: the magsec SMG. It is not the players' fault that CCP did not have a complete weapon list in Uprising 1.0. When we have full racial weapon parity CCP would do well to refund the SP in the weaponry tree. CCP didn't even have to give you the respec on drop suits. They could easily have said you got plenty of "value" out of the SP you spent in the (whatever limited dropsuit choice you made), because you've been running that suit until 1.8. That same argument can be made with weapons. In fact, CCP trickled out weapons much slower than they did with drop suits. If you can't somehow generate 18k sp to skill into a new weapon, then you're doing it wrong.
I'm sorry, are you honestly trying to say that playing with the SMG for nearly a year was *now* wasted SP because you wanted a Magsec way back when? Is the Magsec's performance so overpowered that your SMG skills is utterly useless now? Oh woe is the merc who can't find 18k sp to skill into the Magsec since he doesn't like the SMG's "high clip and rate of fire."
God, these arguments are so weak and so thin that they just don't hold up. Furthermore, CCP has essentially "given" you 2 million SP before 1.8, an easy 750k after 1.8 and nearly 500k for this triple SP week. So, if you're so ****-poor at planning that you "blew" 3,250,000 SP on **** you didn't need instead of spending 18,000 of that SP into a Magsec, then you absolutely deserve to NOT use one. But as far as getting a respec? No. Just ******* deal with it.
THERE WILL ALWAYS BE NEW THINGS ADDED TO THE GAME. YOU WILL NOT GET A RESPEC EVERY TIME.
>> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! <<
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:31:00 -
[42] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:You claim you'll stop once racial parity exists among the weapons. What happens when they add a t2 amarr weapon or add additional weapons that aren't even part of the scope right now?
When/if CCP adds higher "tiers" of weapons that is not the same as fleshing out an incomplete weapon list. In one scenario you are adding missing content, content that SHOULD be there but isn't. In the other scenario you are adding new content that piggybacks off of existing, fully realized content.
When they add whole new spectrum of weapons. For example, let's say EWAR ends up falling into the Weaponry tree somehow. The same logic I used above applies... they aren't adding missing content. They are adding totally new content.
RayRay James wrote:Should CCP stop developing weapons once there is one racial weapon of each type, because by your logic, if CCP were to add a weapon to gallente that no one else has, you should get another respec.
I'll make this simple: when all four races have parity within the weapon list that exists as of 1.8 then we no longer need respecs from that point onward. Any choices players have made will be valid, and will not have been made for them by CCP, at that point.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:38:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:You claim you'll stop once racial parity exists among the weapons. What happens when they add a t2 amarr weapon or add additional weapons that aren't even part of the scope right now? When/if CCP adds higher "tiers" of weapons that is not the same as fleshing out an incomplete weapon list. In one scenario you are adding missing content, content that SHOULD be there but isn't. In the other scenario you are adding new content that piggybacks off of existing, fully realized content. When they add whole new spectrum of weapons. For example, let's say EWAR ends up falling into the Weaponry tree somehow. The same logic I used above applies... they aren't adding missing content. They are adding totally new content. RayRay James wrote:Should CCP stop developing weapons once there is one racial weapon of each type, because by your logic, if CCP were to add a weapon to gallente that no one else has, you should get another respec. I'll make this simple: when all four races have parity within the weapon list that exists as of 1.8 then we no longer need respecs from that point onward. Any choices players have made will be valid, and will not have been made for them by CCP, at that point.
I'll make this simpler then:
They released everything they had planned at 1.0, there was no "missing" content. Everything since then is new weaponry and suits, racial parity or not.
Problem solved. |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Vespasian Andendare wrote:CCP didn't even have to give you the respec on dropsuits. They could easily have said you got plenty of "value" out of the SP you spent in the (whatever limited dropsuit choice you made), because you've been running that suit until 1.8.
Yes, but they didn't, did they? CCP saw that line of logic doesn't hold water.
Vespasian Andendare wrote:If you can't somehow generate 18k sp to skill into a new weapon, then you're doing it wrong.
Generating more SP to skill into weapons that now exist isn't the issue. We've already established that getting into a prototype weapon isn't difficult. That isn't the argument here.
Vespasian Andendare wrote:I'm sorry, are you honestly trying to say that playing with the SMG for nearly a year was *now* wasted SP because you wanted a Magsec way back when? Is the Magsec's performance so overpowered that your SMG skills is utterly useless now? Oh woe is the merc who can't find 18k sp to skill into the Magsec since he doesn't like the SMG's "high clip and rate of fire."
The SMG is a high RoF, CQC weapon with a large clip. The magsec is a comparatively lower RoF, short-to-mid range weapon with a smaller clip.
These weapons are similar, but are used in very different ways. Meaning a player's preference could have leaned toward the magsec, but they were never given the option to choose from the get-go. The SMG was close enough, so we used it at the time.
And yes, if the magsec, in this example, is the weapon that suits my playstyle better than the SMG; the SP spent on the SMG is now effectively useless. Why would I continue to use the SMG when the magsec is the weapon I obviously would have rather used from day 1?
Vespasian Andendare wrote:THERE WILL ALWAYS BE NEW THINGS ADDED TO THE GAME. YOU WILL NOT GET A RESPEC EVERY TIME.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:They released everything they had planned at 1.0, there was no "missing" content.
Hardly...
But I have a feeling you aren't going to be swayed by anything I say anyway. If you have read my posts in this thread and still don't see why a weaponry respec is needed (not now, mind you, but after we achieve weapon parity) then you must have gotten lucky and fallen in love with one of the Uprising 1.0 weapons.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
82
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote: Generating more SP to skill into weapons that now exist isn't the issue. We've already established that getting into a prototype weapon isn't difficult. That isn't the argument here.
Then what exactly is the argument?
If it's not hard to do, why complain about needing a respec?
Also, new content is announced weeks in advance. We get spreadsheets, dev blogs, conversations with players and CPM. If you see something coming down the pipe, start saving your SP. Then, if you reeeeeeeally want something thats "oh, new shiny" you can go straight to prototype if your heart desires. If you cant control yourself enough to not spend your SP, then you have to wait to get the new-bestest.
Nothing is just dropped into Dust without PLENTY of warning. THAT is your notice and your choice. |
Hansei Kaizen
The Jackson Five
142
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 16:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:Theres a rumor goin around that we might get a full respec in may......I think it would be a good idea to have a full respec every new release (chromosone, uprising...etc...)
Im not crying for a respec.....they could start it next year for all I care but i just think people would stop crying if they knew there gonna get to correct there mistakes once the yearly respec comes around.
thoughts.........
It does change nothing. Whatever you spec / respec into, whoever has more SP than you will beat you. With or without respec.
The answer to your complaint is PvE. Always.
NPE status: (Gò»°Gûí°n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
Casual solo
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:Then what exactly is the argument?/quote]
We shouldn't be locked out of a portion of out SP because CCP couldn't be bothered to launch with a complete weapon list.
[quote=RayRay James]Also, new content is announced weeks in advance. We get spreadsheets, dev blogs, conversations with players and CPM. If you see something coming down the pipe, start saving your SP. Then, if you reeeeeeeally want something thats "oh, new shiny" you can go straight to prototype if your heart desires. If you cant control yourself enough to not spend your SP, then you have to wait to get the new-bestest.
Nothing is just dropped into Dust without PLENTY of warning. THAT is your notice and your choice.
We're weren't told on launch day when, or what, would be available in the coming patches.
If a new player had been told that the CR or RR would be available by 1.X patch they might save their SP (as you are suggesting) until their racial weapon of choice has been released. They weren't offered that.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
82
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:06:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:They released everything they had planned at 1.0, there was no "missing" content. Hardly... But I have a feeling you aren't going to be swayed by anything I say anyway. If you have read my posts in this thread and still don't see why a weaponry respec is needed (not now, mind you, but after we achieve weapon parity) then you must have gotten lucky and fallen in love with one of the Uprising 1.0 weapons.
You're right, I won't be swayed by anything you say because, to me, you have been unable to fundamentally show a need for a respec. Not being able to get the newest weapon, or because there wasn't "racial parity" is not a reason.
Also, No I didn't "fall in love" with the 1.0 weapons.. I trained AR to 5 prof 4 then (was it 1.7) the CR / RR we're released. I trained them both to 1 to try them out. Ending up falling in LOVE with the CR, trained it to Cr 5 prof 3.
You know what? I never look at the AR and go "F#ck man, all that wasted SP"
I have SP in weapons all over the board to 1 to try them out, some I trained farther (forge guns, remote explosives), some stopped at 1 (MD, RR, ScR) because I don't enjoy them. I don't consider ANY of that wasted SP and that is what SHOULD be considered wasted SP. If CCP were to add militia versions of all those weapons, should I get that SP back? NO
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
83
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:Then what exactly is the argument?/quote]
We shouldn't be locked out of a portion of out SP because CCP couldn't be bothered to launch with a complete weapon list.
[quote=RayRay James]Also, new content is announced weeks in advance. We get spreadsheets, dev blogs, conversations with players and CPM. If you see something coming down the pipe, start saving your SP. Then, if you reeeeeeeally want something thats "oh, new shiny" you can go straight to prototype if your heart desires. If you cant control yourself enough to not spend your SP, then you have to wait to get the new-bestest.
Nothing is just dropped into Dust without PLENTY of warning. THAT is your notice and your choice. We're weren't told on launch day when, or what, would be available in the coming patches. If a new player had been told that the CR or RR would be available by 1.X patch they might save their SP (as you are suggesting) until their racial weapon of choice has been released. They weren't offered that.
Seriously, you contradict yourself in nearly every other post.
If we weren't told on launch day about new weapons, then everything was "known" at that time. anything after that should be considered new content.
Players WERE told when the CR / RR were going to be available. the told us when 1.6 was active (incoming reason for saving SP), that in 1.7 (have SP saved by now) there would be new things to point at the enemy. I'm sure CCP didn't even have artwork, let alone stats and descriptions, etc for the CR / RR when 1.0 was released. |
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:I have SP in weapons all over the board to 1 to try them out, some I trained farther (forge guns, remote explosives), some stopped at 1 (MD, RR, ScR) because I don't enjoy them. I don't consider ANY of that wasted SP and that is what SHOULD be considered wasted SP. If CCP were to add militia versions of all those weapons, should I get that SP back? NO
Not to be terse... but good for you? I honestly could care less how you view your SP. The fact is we were allowed to skill into weapons before we had the ability to make an informed decision about those weapons.
You say choices matter. You say choices have consequences. You aren't wrong, but we weren't given enough choices.
What are you proposing we should have done? Made our characters then let them sit for months until we had the full list of weapons available to us? Some fun that would be! I bet new players can't wait to run MIL fittings for more than a year while CCP adds in all of the missing content. I can see the tagline for Dust 514 now, "Dust 514, the wait is real!"
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
83
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 17:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:I have SP in weapons all over the board to 1 to try them out, some I trained farther (forge guns, remote explosives), some stopped at 1 (MD, RR, ScR) because I don't enjoy them. I don't consider ANY of that wasted SP and that is what SHOULD be considered wasted SP. If CCP were to add militia versions of all those weapons, should I get that SP back? NO Not to be terse... but good for you? I honestly could care less how you view your SP. The fact is we were allowed to skill into weapons before we had the ability to make an informed decision about those weapons. You say choices matter. You say choices have consequences. You aren't wrong, but we weren't given enough choices. What are you proposing we should have done? Made our characters then let them sit for months until we had the full list of weapons available to us? Some fun that would be! I bet new players can't wait to run MIL fittings for more than a year while CCP adds in all of the missing content. I can see the tagline for Dust 514 now, "Dust 514, the wait is real!"
You were given plenty of choices, you just doing like that later on there were even more choices and cant go back in time and change your mind.
There were a lot of Light weapons, a few side arm and 2 heavy weapons. now there's 2 more light, 4 more side arm, and 0 more heavy. in the future, there will be # more light, # more side arm and 0 more heavy (cuz ccp hates heavies)
What's wrong with using whats given to you to start, and then making the choice to continue using that because you've skiled into it, or changing it up and skilling into something else? You keep talking of this missing content. There is no "missing" content. There is new content that hasn't been added yet.
When I started playing EVE, carriers were just being introduced. Should everyone in EVE have had their SP given back to them because carriers were introduced? If your answer to this is YES, quit playing Dust now.
When EVE was released, there were not even battleships and cruisers took a month+ to be able to afford. EVE now has literally multiples of 10 more content. The same will happen with Dust, and you should not get a respec every time something is added. If you think you should, again, quit playing Dust now and save your sanity. |
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
1790
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:24:00 -
[53] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:What's wrong with using whats given to you to start, and then making the choice to continue using that because you've skiled into it, or changing it up and skilling into something else? You keep talking of this missing content. There is no "missing" content. There is new content that hasn't been added yet.
How about we agree to disagree? There are some fundamental issues we strongly disagree on ("missing content" is a good example). We both feel one way or another about respecs and you can't argue with emotion.
I highly doubt CCP is ever going to read any of the respec discussions anyway Chances are they have already made their decision.
But I do want to bring up one parting thought... these two sentences here...
RayRay James wrote:If your answer to this is YES, quit playing Dust now.
RayRay James wrote:If you think you should, again, quit playing Dust now and save your sanity.
...are not good for the community as a whole. We're already a small community; let's not encourage players to leave simply because they feel slighted by something. Mind you, I'm not going anywhere, but some newberry might get discouraged and take your advice... then we a lose one more squadmate or redberry. Even though Dust infuriates the ever living **** out of me sometimes, I want to see it survive.
He imposes order on the chaos of organic evolution...
|
RayRay James
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
83
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:45:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:RayRay James wrote:What's wrong with using whats given to you to start, and then making the choice to continue using that because you've skiled into it, or changing it up and skilling into something else? You keep talking of this missing content. There is no "missing" content. There is new content that hasn't been added yet. How about we agree to disagree? There are some fundamental issues we strongly disagree on ("missing content" is a good example). We both feel one way or another about respecs and you can't argue with emotion. I highly doubt CCP is ever going to read any of the respec discussions anyway Chances are they have already made their decision. But I do want to bring up one parting thought... these two sentences here... RayRay James wrote:If your answer to this is YES, quit playing Dust now. RayRay James wrote:If you think you should, again, quit playing Dust now and save your sanity. ...are not good for the community as a whole. We're already a small community; let's not encourage players to leave simply because they feel slighted by something. Mind you, I'm not going anywhere, but some newberry might get discouraged and take your advice... then we a lose one more squadmate or redberry. Even though Dust infuriates the ever living **** out of me sometimes, I want to see it survive.
I'll agree to disagree then.
The suggestion to leave is more of a hold over from my EVE days. You're right, we need new blood to keep the game going, but it needs to be the right blood with the right expectations for the game. This game will never be made to coddle players. New Eden is a cold, harsh, evil place and people need to expect that and not try and change it to be CoD or BF.
I too, want to see this game last as long as EVE has. Longer EVEn (see what I did there, ha). I don't like seeing the front page slammed full of whining and complaining because someone wants to drastically change this game. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |