| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1641. Small blasters - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Blaster will never be an adequate ADS front gun until CCP programs in a proper first person cam with swivel, as well as remove the absurd inefficiency towards vehicles and installati...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 05:38:00
|
1642. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Thank You Ok, now those are nice ideas BUT clearly there isn't a fully finalized and ready to implement set of parameters there. BMK? So, more LP? More rebranding of the same already existing elements as a guise of "new co...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 05:03:00
|
1643. Small blasters - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Blaster will never be an adequate ADS front gun until CCP programs in a proper first person cam with swivel, as well as remove the absurd inefficiency towards vehicles and installations. All I know is when we had our ADS v...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 03:41:00
|
1644. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: PS, this might be what Pokey was trying to show you. Its in the archives now, meaning itll be in-game somewhere between 2 to 6 weeks. Theres a chart here. EDIT FFS RATATTI fix the link to the damn development discu...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 03:32:00
|
1645. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 03:28:00
|
1646. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 01:56:00
|
1647. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: 3.No, I do not recall Rattati having posted a PC2.0 document proposal. I am relying on these forums, the official game forums, to have that info but haven't seen it. What has been posted, has been little else than real vague...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 01:54:00
|
1648. Balac's Assault Ck.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
If he was true Caldari, he would be keeping the suit, not selling it.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.16 00:23:00
|
1649. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: Pokey, the more commentary I read from you in tryng to justify this the more utterly divorced from the reality of the topic I realize you are. We've seen bpo's fielded in PC ever since bpo's were available. "Serious" battl...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 22:54:00
|
1650. May someone explain?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Considering you're engaging slightly above its optimal range (40m) its to be expected that he's going to wreck you. Assault Rifle has higher DPS than the RR, so if you engage at or near their optimal range, they will easily out-dps you.
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 22:51:00
|
1651. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
nickmunson wrote: you are taking out roles that ccp intended to be played in every game, there is no such thing as a cheap logi suit that would be viable, bpo links why? 15 seconds can not be used tactically . tanks forget about it, so there f...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 21:06:00
|
1652. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: No combat bonuses, not p2w. The bonuses can be earned without spending aurum. Faster =/= p2w If you can't pay aurum at least pay attention. P2W is such a lame buzzword. People love to toss it around in order to make ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 20:00:00
|
1653. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: If they don't care about the win, they'll use cheap gear and try to dupe you into burning ISK on expensive stuff. And I think many are missing the fundemental of what PC is. It's not about bringing c...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:42:00
|
1654. LOYALTY RANK 4!?!?!?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: If this game was worth investing in I would. Anyway- the team that brings the more isk stands a better chance at winning. Also, trading (pay for loyalty 4) = more officer weapons to some people = win. Y...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:26:00
|
1655. Plasma Cannon Advice - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jumping with a PLC is the scrubby way to use it. With practice and skill you can be extremely successful with both feet firmly on the ground. It's difficult to give specific advice other than learn how to lead your target depending on range. I typ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:21:00
|
1656. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: This isn't some pub match, this is the end game meta. If there is one mode where the best of the best is encouraged to be used, this is it. Your idea on what PC should be is just wrong. There should be absolutely no incentive t...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 19:15:00
|
1657. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside. What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than ex...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 18:05:00
|
1658. Announcement:Changes to Planetary Conquest Reward Mechanics - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Then let's set the math aside. What functional, logical, immersive, or performance gaining reason do you have for having BPO's in PC? What is their functional purpose other than exploiting a defensive move to freely defend a...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.15 04:07:00
|
1659. POLL: What type of Active Booster Do/Would You Purchase/Use/Like? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are you currently purchasing active boosters? why or why not? I have in the past when I had more dedicated time to focus to Dust for large chunks of play. However due to life situation I often cannot dedicate enough time reliably to make active ...
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.13 22:25:00
|
1660. Biomassed Episode 49: "Your Daily Deadpool" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Joseph Ridgeson wrote: In the spirit of the banner, go get yourself a Poptart. Funny enough, I have a Poptart sitting on the desk next to me right now. Is that why the one in the picture has a bite out of it?
- by Pokey Dravon - at 2015.04.13 22:02:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |