Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. [EVENT] TEMPLAR MANHUNT EVENT: EARN REWARDS AND TEST-DRIVE EXCLUSIVE DROPSUITS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can I be "Amarr Templar 128" please? *insert overwhelmingly cute puppy dog face here*
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.27 14:31:00
|
82. CCP Templar Manhunt No Love for Blueberry's that Pre-Order Collector Edition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aqua-Regia wrote: 1)Anyone that brought/pre-order the Eve The Second Decade Collector Edition and have a 'Templar' Drop Uplink should be initial to be a Templars first-generation cloned soldier. Templars should be named AMARR TEMPLAR+001 up to ...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.26 22:12:00
|
83. [EVENT] TEMPLAR MANHUNT EVENT: EARN REWARDS AND TEST-DRIVE EXCLUSIVE DROPSUITS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delirium Inferno wrote: Xocoyol Zaraoul wrote: I'm willing to bet that given CCP creates and names the characters for us They are, and they already confirmed what the names are going to be as well. Amarr Templar001 Amarr Templar002 . . . ...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.25 00:11:00
|
84. [EVENT] TEMPLAR MANHUNT EVENT: EARN REWARDS AND TEST-DRIVE EXCLUSIVE DROPSUITS - in General Discussions [original thread]
This should be an interesting event. 300 Templars out and about over the three days...you can bet some of them will be great players and very hard to kill. Gotta work for that ISK people :P
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.24 21:08:00
|
85. Changes to salvage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ghural wrote: I'm interested in how officer weapons will be entering the game, if players will only be looting weapons that were brought to the match, as officer weapons cannot be obtained any other way. Same as in EVE...PvE. Find an officer...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.21 21:47:00
|
86. Amarr has the least amount of weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hold on...since when was the Laser Rifle supposed to be a Sniper Rifle replacement?
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.20 02:00:00
|
87. CRONOS: MITHology 101 - in General Discussions [original thread]
TBH, that is a pretty bad way to tell that story. Missing a lot of info...and I mean a lot.
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 23:29:00
|
88. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: This may make me subject to flame but I'm back on the Gilmore Girls and don't think I'll be able to stop anytime soon. Not sure you can get flamed for that when you have a female avatar...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:58:00
|
89. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
bigolenuts wrote: Blamejudg3s KEQ wrote: RuckingFetard wrote: Blamejudg3s KEQ wrote: WUT ANG wrote: Is chronos friendly with rise of legion or somethin? No just everyone hates BHD.... Why? the QQ is strong in them the lies...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:55:00
|
90. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rupture Reaperson wrote: Phoenix Archer 128 wrote: Just one question Prin...were you even in either battle? Because I don't recall seeing your name at all... He was tanking as well as stubby, he got a couple of dropship kills actually. H...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:48:00
|
91. AWOXING in Planetary Conquest: Addressing the Planet Crashing issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Phoenix Archer 128 wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Simply put - all of your guys's idea is indeed taking away from Meta. I would prefer we find a balance of sabotage vs protection, and a kicking function simply eliminates s...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:45:00
|
92. AWOXING in Planetary Conquest: Addressing the Planet Crashing issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Simply put - all of your guys's idea is indeed taking away from Meta. I would prefer we find a balance of sabotage vs protection, and a kicking function simply eliminates sabotaging. And I never said my idea was full proof...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:15:00
|
93. AWOXING in Planetary Conquest: Addressing the Planet Crashing issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: I do not agree about a kick option. Limiting a players availability to join without rank permission is enough - if they get past that hurdle they should be able to sabotage at pleasure. But if you want to add a kick SQUAD o...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:09:00
|
94. AWOXING in Planetary Conquest: Addressing the Planet Crashing issue - in General Discussions [original thread]
You can kick people from a Fleet in EVE. I don't see why this should be any different. Whoever leads the battle should be able to kick anyone, and Squad Leaders should be able to kick anyone in their squad.
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 20:03:00
|
95. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
bigolenuts wrote: Winscar Shinobi wrote: Knight SoIaire wrote: I dont care about you bringing in outsiders, do that all you want, but **** talking afterwards when clearly your ringers performed best is another thing. Yes, not having enou...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:51:00
|
96. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just one question Prin...were you even in either battle? Because I don't recall seeing your name at all...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:47:00
|
97. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: Phoenix Archer 128 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Phoenix Archer 128 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: is any of this crap needed? we may have used people in our alliance to help us out, but if more than half of your corp was unavai...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:31:00
|
98. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
Winscar Shinobi wrote: bigolenuts wrote: Winscar Shinobi wrote: bigolenuts wrote: Malcolm Shinobi Nolasco BHD 1- Rofl 0 Yet again nothing personal but some deadly blue dots like to talk **** and then can't back it up. Then they ha...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:27:00
|
99. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echo 1991 wrote: Phoenix Archer 128 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: is any of this crap needed? we may have used people in our alliance to help us out, but if more than half of your corp was unavailable what would you guys have done? stop making ...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:21:00
|
100. A message to BHD - in General Discussions [original thread]
bigolenuts wrote: You guys keep beating the "it was your Alliance" dead horse. Why? Do you even know what the purpose of an Alliance is for? Shinobi didn't post, "BHD-1 DBD-0"..He said, "BHD-1 RoFL-0"..We fight together. Together meaning as an ...
- by Phoenix Archer 128 - at 2013.05.19 19:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |