| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
301. what are you guys planning SP wise?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't know about you guys... But I'd hold off on putting SP into dropsuits for the next little while. >:)
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.31 14:55:00
|
302. Before You Demand CSM Representation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Good post is good. I'd like to point out though, that dust representation on the Eve CSM would be a horrible thing for another reason. They may be linked, but they are two individual games. Already there is so much within Eve to talk about in th...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.28 08:54:00
|
303. Unofficial Dust CSM IRC channel - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lol Edit: I was going to write more, but I'm not sure why it only took "Lol". Either way, I decided it was best not to say what I was going to.
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.26 11:43:00
|
304. The viability of a Dust candidate on the CSM - in General Discussions [original thread]
The biggest problem with what you're suggesting Finn, is who decides who would sit on this player run/operated board? How would it be policed/regulated? Who decides what the group talks about, and what is sent off to CCP? I don't think an arb...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.25 19:53:00
|
305. The viability of a Dust candidate on the CSM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sure, SoTa. We might not need a full blown 12 player council yet. But Dust is always going to have a minority seat on any Eve council. Anyone expecting otherwise has unreasonable expectations. The point of the CSM is to bring player issues dire...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.25 08:32:00
|
306. The viability of a Dust candidate on the CSM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote: Dust doesn't need its own council. That's one of the worst ideas that keeps cropping up. It just needs one or two people on the current CSM when the time is right. I disagree. While connected, the two games are not...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.25 08:01:00
|
307. New Blog: Gameplay Fixes 1.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dusters Blog wrote: We're confident many of these tweaks to gameplay can be made and with one look at CCPs history at addressing loopholes (swarm launcher, knife, tactical assault rifle and most recently, grenades and the SP Cap) its easy to u...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.24 12:25:00
|
308. Sticky:DUST 514 IRC channel - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP: You can unsticky this now. Huge thanks go out to everyone who posted and joined us in this chatroom. There is no longer any need to register your nickname in this thread, as the room is completely public now. Enjoy :)
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.24 02:06:00
|
309. ZionShad is Officially running for CSM8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Personally, I think you shouldn't waste your time. You haven't been playing eve long enough to contribute positively there (You started playing eve what... four weeks ago?) and I don't feel Dust has any business being on the EVE CSM. If CCP reall...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.24 00:57:00
|
310. New Blog: Join the Take-a-Merc-to-Work Event - in General Discussions [original thread]
While I'm flattered you included me in your article, I do find it hard to be supportive. Don't get me wrong. I'm in favor of any initiative that makes a positive impact on Dust and its community as a whole. However... I struggle to find myself w...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.17 22:53:00
|
311. New Eden ESports Open Beta Party - in General Discussions [original thread]
Confirming the ISK holding corp is run by my alt.
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.16 21:50:00
|
312. The player balancing initiative needs YOU! - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: I already knew. Now I also know you are useless. That's hardly a fair assesment. If you'd like to squad up sometime, I'd love to actually play with you. Maybe you'd even like to make some positive contributio...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.14 20:34:00
|
313. The player balancing initiative needs YOU! - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: I would be perfectly happy if you wouldn't just be useless in game to make your petulant points. At least this is an adult reaction. I wonder how long you can keep it up? Yes, that was me firing sniper rounds into your he...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.14 11:54:00
|
314. BPO Items: Should they be removed entirely? - in General Discussions [original thread]
trollsroyce wrote: Bpo mechanic allows for much future expansion. When the link between eve and dust economics happens, bpo can be used to make weapons below market price for resale, corp use etc. Bpo's can become ultra valuable rewards for dro...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.14 11:51:00
|
315. BPO Items: Should they be removed entirely? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Simple fix.....remove the flattening stats of the weapons. Return them back to Codex stats. It's not just weapons though, it's suits. I do agree. Reverting the tiericide for both weapons/suits would be the way to go. But...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.14 01:29:00
|
316. The player balancing initiative needs YOU! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yay Adski wrote: Good luck Nova Scrubmuffin. You'll need it, oh and don't make things any worse Why don't you come on IRC anymore, btw? I miss you, Adski. Come back to me!
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.14 00:09:00
|
317. The player balancing initiative needs YOU! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Got a fair bit of responses ingame to this. Going to spend the next little while chatting with the folks who were interested. :)
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.13 21:38:00
|
318. BPO Items: Should they be removed entirely? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: This whole "needs to be a reason to upgrade" thing has dragged on for a really long time. There is a reason to upgrade, it isn't the base stats, it is the extra mod slots. More mod slots=beastiality. GL killing a proto logi load...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.13 21:33:00
|
319. BPO Items: Should they be removed entirely? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Necandi Brasil wrote: The advantages of BPO's requiring materials to be used. 1) You can make BPC's and sell for money (Even more if you have a rare bpo) 2) You can buy the materials and make it yourself (this way you can save money). 3) It ope...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.13 21:17:00
|
320. BPO Items: Should they be removed entirely? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm curious as to what everyone's thoughts are on BPO items. The more time goes on, the less and less I like these. CCP advertised dust as a game defined by RISK vs REWARD. Going into battle and actually losing the assets you bring in if you di...
- by Nova Knife - at 2013.01.13 21:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |