| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
261. Squad up you say! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flint Beastgood III wrote: Yeah, using squad finder can be as bad as going in with 15 solo noobs. Squad up, but be smart about it, lol. If you come top of your team in a match, quickly make a squad and invite everyone that did well in that ma...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.10 14:59:00
|
262. Squad up you say! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flint Beastgood III wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: 1/62 KDR.... Christ. IKR, the worst I have seen personally is 1/30. This was over the course of several games.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.10 14:58:00
|
263. Squad up you say! - in General Discussions [original thread]
So I did. I inherited a squad from squad finder, two new players showed up. We played 6 games, the total for the first was 1/62 kdr, he managed to get a couple hacks in. The other guy got no kill and died even more but managed some kill assists. I...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.10 09:00:00
|
264. CPM Judge Rhadamanthus is livestreaming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Man if CPM had an internal scoring system on things they do like show up for the meetings; leaving suggestions; having a convo with a developer. Oh wait... They sho...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.10 08:50:00
|
265. CPM Judge Rhadamanthus is livestreaming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't see how anyone can really complain about community feedback and communication anymore.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.09 22:58:00
|
266. CPM Judge Rhadamanthus is livestreaming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Man if CPM had an internal scoring system on things they do like show up for the meetings; leaving suggestions; having a convo with a developer. Oh wait... They should give you 5 strongboxes for attending 1 meeting, ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.09 22:56:00
|
267. Questioning Scout Bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Clone D wrote: Infiltration : Profile dampen scout to 14 db. Carry an R-9 uplink. Go to an enemy objective. Drop two uplinks at separate locations on the outskirts. Move in and hack everything. Set 3 REs on/around the ob...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.08 21:12:00
|
268. Logis Aren't Doing Thier Jobs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Nothing Certain wrote: Proxies are one option, one that to be effective requires as many proxies as you can lay down, meaning no links, hives or remotes. It seens like a poor tradeoff for a logi to do this. Who is supposed ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.08 14:01:00
|
269. Logis Aren't Doing Thier Jobs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Byozuma Kegawa wrote: Uplinks have short lifespans due to people actually hunting them down, half the time to spawn-camp and the other to actually get rid of it. Proximities have classically been the purview of scouts because ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.08 11:25:00
|
270. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
PRECISELY! I am tired of seeing infamtry say "oh but they can go 30/0 in their huge fortress of armor" What makes a tank and an infantry player going 30/0 so different? They both 30/0 They were both unstoppable and annoying to your eyes. But ...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.07 22:20:00
|
271. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Boot Booter wrote: I think the issue is vehicles get insta popped by AV. Just yesterday I started specing into dropships again and started flying a Myron about. This experience would be similar to a newbie (except I'm a much better pilot probab...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.07 22:07:00
|
272. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
You are not seeing my point. You are crying that you don't want tanks to be better on the field because they can go 30-0 when we have infantry doing the same thing. That is just hypocritical. And don't bring the "Oh but I have to use a swarm w...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.07 15:43:00
|
273. AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''AV users do want a 50% damage nerf to all AV weapons '' No we dont. It's meant to be a troll. This is some tanker thinking his shiny toy got nerfed too hard because he think tanks should be invincible.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.07 15:36:00
|
274. Man, nerf the caldari assault already - in General Discussions [original thread]
They are good, not OP. They do seem faster and more agile than their stats suggest though. At least they feel that way to me.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.06 21:14:00
|
275. Vehicle Threads? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Draden Brohiem wrote: None of the above. Vehicles are in a rough spot, to cost the way they do, and players are voicing their opinions.... which they are still allowed to do right? The same way...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.06 20:59:00
|
276. Vehicle Threads? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: shaman oga wrote: Most are not even about AV vs vehicle, but everytime you talk about tanks, AVers come out and whine. It's coded in their DNA. The thing is that when you leave a bunch of people who all agree in a sta...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.06 04:37:00
|
277. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: TEBOW BAGGINS wrote: Draden Brohiem wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: True Adamance wrote: Lolworthy thread is lolworthy. Then what is our role? Scenery lol! In all seriousness though, I'm a tanker. It sucks?! I...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.05 14:06:00
|
278. Remembering no bandwidth - in General Discussions [original thread]
Teams with protosquads can always do this. BW just means that one red can't do much to oppose it, especially if that entails being a heavy.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.05 02:33:00
|
279. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gunloggi and Python are about where AV/ Vehicle balance should be. Vehicle users have legitimate gripes about the role but IAV balance isn't one of them.
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.04 17:21:00
|
280. Why are tanks here? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buwaro Draemon wrote: It's okay for a CalScout or MinAss or even a Sentinel to go 30/0 in a match But god forbid a 400k tank going 15/0 in a match Infantry is nothing but hypocrites nowadays. The only time I get mad at a tank is when the ta...
- by Nothing Certain - at 2015.01.04 17:19:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |