| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
3281. lower the public contract and FW vehicle quota - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: chase rowland wrote: so everyone can STFU . seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all. No it wouldn't. If you could have only 3 vehicles, then those 3 would inevitably be...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 14:15:00
|
3282. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: PS2 has no win or lose mechanic As for reward infantry? why reward just infantry? why cant we reward tanks for holding the line or a point? why is everything for infantry they already get points for uplink spawns MCRU ...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 14:10:00
|
3283. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
steadyhand amarr wrote: Isk should have always been matched to kills/support/objectives taken/hacked - isk for objectives lost. Not split out across the team where pushing or playing the objective is punshed and tankspam / redline snipeing is r...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 14:06:00
|
3284. So now that the tables have turned... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: God Hates Lags wrote: I remember way back in Uprising 1.whatever, when all the tankers were complaining that a militia swarm launcher should never be able to take out a proto tank. So now that proto swarms can no longer tak...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 14:05:00
|
3285. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: So your scheme to reduce vehicle usage is to return to them to unprofitability? You want to reignite the whole "My tank costs so much that it must be strong enough to last X matches, therefore it must be indestructible." argumen...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 13:52:00
|
3286. Cultural insensitivity and suicide bombing in DUST 514. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mithridates VI wrote: Can we cut it out with the references to "jihad jeeps" and variations thereof, guise? Thanks. It's just a phrase coined in Battlfield, it's not culturally insensitive. You're not one of those people demanding the Reds...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 13:44:00
|
3287. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
Protocake JR wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Protocake JR wrote: The only thing that can balance out tank spam is AV spam. Currently, the plamsa cannon and swarm launchers take up an entire light slot. That's like, if you are playing Battlef...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 13:30:00
|
3288. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Reduce WP and ISK rewards for killing targets while in a vehicle. That could actually work, but even if you did reduce those, you could probably still blap enough of a team to cover the cost of our current HAVs, which is why I...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 13:24:00
|
3289. Look, there's only one way to truly counter the "tank spam", and i... - in General Discussions [original thread]
As KAGEHOSHI and I were discussing last night, you need to incentivize playing to objectives more than just giving WP for hacking them. The example he gave was giving Offense and Defense bonuses for fighting near objectives. For a reference point...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 13:12:00
|
3290. CCP For vehicle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
AROS nabe wrote: And returned to the performance of the 1.6-to-vehicle weapons and HAV Appeared earlier had balanced Maggot is nowhere head CCP If you're thinking more of now is good Raise to 5 times the price of the turret and the price of ...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 12:58:00
|
3291. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
Protocake JR wrote: The only thing that can balance out tank spam is AV spam. Currently, the plamsa cannon and swarm launchers take up an entire light slot. That's like, if you are playing Battlefield, giving up your primary weapon (AR, SMG, S...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 12:57:00
|
3292. Dropships are still useless - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: Win all to dropships Sica basic damage amp mlt hardener basic ammo expansion x2 Total SP investment 323,360 SP Effect: You can now redline railgun on most any map and have the ability to 3-shot any assault dropship with a tan...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 07:03:00
|
3293. ITS A BIRD ITS A PLANE ITS AN AHAMAD LAV OF DEATH! - in General Discussions [original thread]
bear90211 wrote: As we all know, you can put 36 RE's of your own on a lav, this ALI ALI ACKBAH LAV has to do is drive into a vehicle or wall to murder ANYTHING, CCP MAKE RE's NOT STICK TO VEHICLES!!! Jihad Jeep is a legitimate strategy. I'm ...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 07:01:00
|
3294. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Cosgar wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Sir, ISK is not and should not ever be a balancing factor. lmfao I love this, I get to say exactly what AVers say, and now I understand why they did it when...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 06:56:00
|
3295. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Sir, ISK is not and should not ever be a balancing factor. lmfao I love this, I get to say exactly what AVers say, and now I understand why they did it when they were OP as ****. And how do you figure cost has no factor i...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.17 06:27:00
|
3296. Thank you for the payment State Peacekeepers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: 82 teamkills. 82 LP. I find this most amusing. In retribution for the griefing of my fellow Gallentean Aeon Amadi (who completely endorses this thread ) and more importantly for my own personal amusement, I have tak...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.16 22:40:00
|
3297. I think it's pretty evident at this point that HAVs need a cost increase - in General Discussions [original thread]
But what should also come back is the bonus to CPU and PG that come from the vehicle Electronics and Engineering skills. Look at it this way: I got the chance to play with some dedicated tankers on Friday and Saturday, and even the ones who woul...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.16 21:37:00
|
3298. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Yes really. Infantry can't be slaughtered by tanks, and tanks get their tank vs tank battles. Everybody wins. This is actually a bad idea. I mean, don't get me wrong, you've come up with a lot of cool ideas and I've posted so...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.16 21:26:00
|
3299. Dropship Channels? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dunk Mujunk wrote: Looking for some good public channels for Dropship pilots. 1st Airborne. Almost all of us are in there.
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.16 21:26:00
|
3300. Cloaks for scouts only. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Someone had to say it: cloaks should be scout only, for fucks sake we can't have one bloody thing to ourselves? Mark my words that this module will be abused heavily by non scout players, just watch it happen. Oh, you ...
- by Mobius Wyvern - at 2013.12.16 21:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |