DUST Search - lower the public contract and FW vehicle quota

All Channels

General Discussions

lower the public contract and FW vehicle quota

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.16 17:09:00 - [1] - Quote so everyone can STFU. seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all.
Beren Hurin Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 1914	Posted - 2013.12.16 17:13:00 - [2] - Quote chase rowland wrote: so everyone can STFU. seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all. No it wouldn't. If you could have only 3 vehicles, then those 3 would inevitably be tanks, and unless you could bring your own 3 tanks up against the other tanks, whoever could group their firepower together first would be most likely to win.
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.16 17:44:00 - [3] - Quote Beren Hurin wrote: chase rowland wrote: so everyone can STFU. seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all. No it wouldn't. If you could have only 3 vehicles, then those 3 would inevitably be tanks, and unless you could bring your own 3 tanks up against the other tanks, whoever could group their firepower together first would be most likely to win. what do you mean that wouldn't fix it? if there is only 3 or 2 tanks then people wouldn't spam the crap. just make separate quotas.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 8940	Posted - 2013.12.16 17:48:00 - [4] - Quote I'd rather be able to call out my dropship thanks, instead of it coming down to who spammed call vehicle first. Fix militia tanks, and most of the problem goes away. Vids / O7
Nirwanda Vaughns 253	Posted - 2013.12.16 18:01:00 - [5] - Quote I think they should employ a similar system as they do for drones on the ship of EVE. each team has say 2000vp (Vehicle points) each vehicle has a certain amount of points so a tank is 750, DS 500 LAV 250 that means you can have 2 tanks but then you're only left with room for one DS or two LAV what that would also mean as well is tankers being more cautious as if their tank goes down someone else may bring something in leaving them on foot and also people ould have to work together to recall a vehicle to swap to a DS if they wanna take high point ect. It's only after we have lost everything, are we free to do anything.... Unless CCP take away your BPOs
Reav Hannari Red Rock Outriders 2230	Posted - 2013.12.16 18:14:00 - [6] - Quote As someone trying to master the fine art of not crashing dropships while actually killing stuff its become exceedingly difficult for me to call in a ship with the tank spam. Lowering the quota would make it even harder. As it is most of the time I have to wait for the first tank to explode which usually takes about a minute. Man, some of those rookie tank drivers are really bad. // Adapt or Die // Matari Logistics / Scout / Dropship Crash Tester // @ReesNoturana
Leovarian L Lavitz NECROM0NGERS Covert Intervention 871	Posted - 2013.12.16 18:16:00 - [7] - Quote The meta hasn't completely adapted yet. Wait till all those forgers get specced up. Lav full of red berries heading for the hills? That dropship got 6 fatties in it in route to a tower... It's actually going to be a full-time role now rather than last build when it was, one forge gunner ruler of the world. IN b4 but but but, that's 6 infantry not taking points! Well, those tanks are 6 infantry not taking points either! Omni-Soldier Few are my equal in one of these specialties, and there are none who can compare in all of them.
DUST Fiend OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 8953	Posted - 2013.12.16 18:29:00 - [8] - Quote Leovarian L Lavitz wrote: IN b4 but but but, that's 6 infantry not taking points! Well, those tanks are 6 infantry not taking points either! Who just happen to be slaughtering your team while your forge gunners are dicking around trying to get an opening long enough to charge and shoot Vids / O7
Eltra Ardell Goonfeet Top Men. 232	Posted - 2013.12.16 18:35:00 - [9] - Quote Buff AV. Increase the cost of militia tanks. Done. The new vehicle pass is pretty good, other than the fact that 70k militia tanks are dominating and effectively immune to 100k Proto AV suits.
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:03:00 - [10] - Quote but to have separate quotas for each vehicle would fix a lot don't you think? that way 2 or 3 tanks could be out for each team and about the same for derpships or LAVs. instead of 7 tanks..... and honestly, its mlt gear tanks. when people are fully skilled into them then they wont be around for long. just give people time to skill into it, its the same for when a awesome dropsuit or weapon comes in but a deeper SP sink.

Repe Susi Rautaleijona Top Men. 839	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:05:00 - [11] - Quote chase rowland wrote: but to have separate quotas for each vehicle would fix a lot don't you think? that way 2 or 3 tanks could be out for each team and about the same for derpships or LAVs. instead of 7 tanks..... and honestly, its mlt gear tanks. of course its going to be cheap, the mlt dropsuits cost nothing. when people are fully skilled into them then they wont be around for long. just give people time to skill into it, its the same for when a awesome dropsuit or weapon comes in but a deeper SP sink. Yep, separate quotas for each vehicle class. Smeehf.
dust badger SOUND Mercs Of Sound Mind 351	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:10:00 - [12] - Quote i rather have lots of weak tanks then 2 or 3 invincible tanks
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:12:00 - [13] - Quote Repe Susi wrote: chase rowland wrote: but to have separate quotas for each vehicle would fix a lot don't you think? that way 2 or 3 tanks could be out for each team and about the same for derpships or LAVs. instead of 7 tanks..... and honestly, its mlt gear tanks. of course its going to be cheap, the mlt dropsuits cost nothing. when people are fully skilled into them then they wont be around for long. just give people time to skill into it, its the same for when a awesome dropsuit or weapon comes in but a deeper SP sink. Yep, separate quotas for each vehicle class. I love how we got to a good conclusion without having to act stupid. I mean, just look at some of those threads out there. there are some people who think they should have HP the level of a MCC and then there are some people wanting to blow up tanks with an AR. I seriously think if they just added separate quotas, people would just calm down a bit.
Yagihige Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 487	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:12:00 - [14] - Quote Just lower for Ambush, not Skirmish/Domination. Also, separated limits for LAVs/HAVs. em ta kool t'nod
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 4107	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:15:00 - [15] - Quote Beren Hurin wrote: chase rowland wrote: so everyone can STFU. seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all. No it wouldn't. If you could have only 3 vehicles, then those 3 would inevitably be tanks, and unless you could bring your own 3 tanks up against the other tanks, whoever could group their firepower together first would be most likely to win. Yeah, it would effectively mean that the start of a match would be a rush to call in your tank before anyone else could, and anyone who specced into LAVs or Dropships would just be screwed, never able to call in their vehicles. Amidst the blue skies A link from past to future The sheltering wings of the protector
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.17 14:17:00 - [16] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: chase rowland wrote: so everyone can STFU. seriously, this would fix most issues with this patch and its shtty tank spam. that is all. No it wouldn't. If you could have only 3 vehicles, then those 3 would inevitably be tanks, and unless you could bring your own 3 tanks up against the other tanks, whoever could group their firepower together first would be most likely to win. Yeah, it would effectively mean that the start of a match would be a rush to call in your tank before anyone else could, and anyone who specced into LAVs or Dropships would just be screwed, never able to call in their vehicles. read my other posts in this thread. we went over separate vehicle quotas.
chase rowland The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 122	Posted - 2013.12.17 17:01:00 - [17] - Quote bumpity bump


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.