| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1241. selling and trading on the marketplace - in General Discussions [original thread]
GD seriously needs a banner... 1. The Player's Market WILL NOT happen. It's dead! Tell your friends! Tell your neighbors! Spread the truth! 2. There will be NO MORE RESPECS. Tell your friends! Tell your neighbors! Spread the truth! 3. PVE WILL ...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.25 07:22:00
|
1242. Disappointment in Endorsement lists by candidates - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Judge is going to be CPM. And I really don't like that idea at all. IF that happens, then if it does, tell me why you think that. leave it till after though. Then you can make fun of me if I...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.25 00:28:00
|
1243. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: How about 5 sentinels and a scout in a squad? It is actually shocking to me that you support 24/7 360 scans for a whole squad. You haven't given one reason why this is a good mech...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.25 00:25:00
|
1244. can heavies stop bitching please - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm drinking away my pain tonight. Just found out I'm a terrible player. What sucks is I'm going to get drunk and try to explain to a bartender who has no idea what CPU/PG, prototype and what a Rattati is. FML.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.25 00:04:00
|
1245. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: How about 5 sentinels and a scout in a squad? It is actually shocking to me that you support 24/7 360 scans for a whole squad. You haven't given one reason why this is a good mechanic. And you haven't given me one good r...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.25 00:00:00
|
1246. Disappointment in Endorsement lists by candidates - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge is going to be CPM. And I really don't like that idea at all.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:44:00
|
1247. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Counter what? My scout needs 2-3 damps and my assault is unable to hide. My heavy is the only thing I can use to push a point and even then all heavies know which direction I'm coming from and where I'm aiming. How do you co...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:43:00
|
1248. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Yo seriously man, be quiet. So are you only into Broken stuff? So what is actually broken about the direction arrows from tacnet??? So you're into witch...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:32:00
|
1249. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Yo seriously man, be quiet. So are you only into Broken stuff? So what is actually broken about the direction arrows from tacnet??? So you're into witch hunts? I'm not particularly fond of looking...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:10:00
|
1250. So who is next - in General Discussions [original thread]
Commandos, yes. Then the loop will start all over again. Groundhog Day 514
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:08:00
|
1251. can heavies stop bitching please - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eh, I want to see this in action. On paper is one thing, on the battlefield its entirely something else. A prototype sentinel should be able to be all prototype. Again, more unnecessary penalizing.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 23:07:00
|
1252. Is it too much to ask? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remember when Arnold told you to get to the chopper? Well this time around he wants you in a squad.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 22:21:00
|
1253. CPM1 Candidates Stance on Pve - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is this thread serious or clueless? There will be no PVE. Its a dead subkect like talking about a players market.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 22:18:00
|
1254. Disappointment in Endorsement lists by candidates - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cause you have conversations with people doesnt mean you have a good idea of who they are. Do you not remember when you stood representative of the PFC council while its members committed to a nefarious vision that you didnt share? You didnt reali...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 22:15:00
|
1255. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: I do, however, want shared passives removed entirely. There will be no balance until a heavy with an HMG cannot have the scan powers of a 3-4 precision caldari scout. Dont blame caldaris, now its amarrs...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 22:09:00
|
1256. What if we removed the direction arrows from tacnet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yo seriously man, be quiet.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 22:07:00
|
1257. Disappointment in Endorsement lists by candidates - in General Discussions [original thread]
Immortal John Ripper wrote: Voting is already over. Division or not CPM1 candidates have a right to have their voices heard. To discuss what they like in other candidates and what they do not like. The same right as every player on this forum h...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 21:33:00
|
1258. Cal Heavy PG poor - in General Discussions [original thread]
The change is to weaken heavies for being heavies so people can feel that they have a chance to dispose of one when in reality if they were tactical in the first place, they wouldn't have these problems.
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 09:30:00
|
1259. OP and Proficiency - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kyr Kitar wrote: Somewhat confused... Are some of the claims based in actual fact that they are OP or has the mercenary fought against another who skilled that weapon to lvl 5 proficiency, giving him ample damage compared to most who probabl...
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 09:26:00
|
1260. OP and Proficiency - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is it really OP or did the mercenary actually skilled his weapon to lvl 5 pro?
- by Michael Arck - at 2014.07.24 08:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |