Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
401. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leadfoot10 wrote: Unless you run a tank, Ambush is no fun, and that's a problem. One way to solve the problem with Ambush today would be to take the OPs advice and remove vehicles from Ambush. Another way would be to make infantry-bound AV a ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.04 08:14:00
|
402. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sirys Lyons wrote: Marston VC wrote: [quote=Sirys Lyons] That reason exists in domination and skirmish. In those game modes they can support the team by pushing/defending objectives as they were intended to do. In ambush the only thing to do...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.04 07:52:00
|
403. CCP your matchmaking and Tiering is Garbage - in General Discussions [original thread]
APOPHIS Xxx wrote: Mithridates VI wrote: True Adamance wrote: Please fix it so new players have a chance at enjoying this game before assholes like me who wont get off their mains and who enjoy running triple damage module high EHP armour...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.04 07:05:00
|
404. CCP your matchmaking and Tiering is Garbage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dj grammer wrote: CCP Saberwing wrote: Whoa, whoa whoa. - No, 1.8 is not coming this month due to the Holidays. And you just spelled out doom for any new players there They were set back probably two weeks thanks to the holidays. A tw...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.04 07:03:00
|
405. CCP your matchmaking and Tiering is Garbage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: KingBabar wrote: Removing vehicles from Ambush? I Dunno, I spend enough time on foot trying to find anything to shoot at. The maps are too big compared to playercount. Either rewamp the game mode and make smaller ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.04 07:01:00
|
406. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Spectre-M wrote: I don't see any MCCs. How's the RDV getting there? RDVs are from the warbarge, dumbass. Right, You just said RDV's are from the MCC. So if an MCC isn't there where should they be coming from? ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.03 00:38:00
|
407. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Ambush is admittedly broken. I think the only vehicles allowed should be Dropships LAV Tanks don't really have a viable spot because there is NO VIABLE COVER... and that is a real irritation. The LAV could be ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:27:00
|
408. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bubba Brown wrote: STB suggesting that (gasp) tanks should not be in ambush? good golly gosh what an upset Do not let the sins of our past (ted nugget/lurchassauras/Ragewardog) define how you think of us today! We have changed a lot as a cor...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:26:00
|
409. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Serimos Haeraven wrote: Michael Epic wrote: Tanks make this game not any fun to play anymore. Ambush mode yesterday, first time I've played in a couple weeks and I saw 4 tanks on the enemy side and 3 tanks on our side. Guess which side won?...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:25:00
|
410. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rifter7 wrote: no supply depots in tactical positions need to be added. maybe make them indestructable. maybe. How would supply depots fix anything? At the very most an organized squad would be able to make a "buffer zone" out of AV to keep ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:20:00
|
411. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: Tl;dr "lets deny a whole gamemode to a specific subset of people because I'm too much of a baby to actually skill into av". Tanks & dropships aren't much if a problem - the mlt 80k tourist tanks are. Assault & br...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:19:00
|
412. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Serimos Haeraven wrote: Marston VC wrote: Serimos Haeraven wrote: Remove dropships from Ambush and you'll give us pilots no where to go to get away from the broken mechanic of redline railgun campers, that's why dropship squads like ones ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 23:12:00
|
413. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
PEW JACKSON wrote: Uber long OP Make a separate game mode for vehicles only. 1 tank 1 try. If you die, that's if for the match. Ambush without tanks would be sort of fun when not getting proto stomped. I'd rather get proto stomped then ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 18:09:00
|
414. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Serimos Haeraven wrote: Remove dropships from Ambush and you'll give us pilots no where to go to get away from the broken mechanic of redline railgun campers, that's why dropship squads like ones i roll with go into Ambush, because only in ther...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 18:08:00
|
415. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mitch Laurence wrote: I see ambush basically as TDM. Vehicles have no place in TDM. I thought this was obvious. Apparently not
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 18:05:00
|
416. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Ambush should be infantry only. Ambush should also have a spawn system that isn't entirely ridiculous. Neither of these things are very likely to happen. Because CCP. Fixed*
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 18:04:00
|
417. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Serimos Haeraven wrote: Remove dropships from Ambush and you'll give us pilots no where to go to get away from redline railgun campers, that's why dropship squads like ones i roll with go into Ambush, because only in there is it fair for tanks ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 18:03:00
|
418. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sirys Lyons wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Sirys Lyons wrote: Frankly, no. Vehicles should be allowed in Ambush. But vehicles shouldn't be the ultimate anti-personnel weapon, either. You should be able to call in a tank - but you should ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 17:57:00
|
419. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
m twiggz wrote: Scout Registry wrote: Ambush could be cured by limiting HAVs to 1-2 per side. I agree with this. Removing them completely would be silly. Six tanks per team when there's only 16 mercs per side is a bit extreme. Especially ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 17:53:00
|
420. Should vehicles be in ambush? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: I would certainly support a infantry only gamemode. Give people the options. How can it hurt? Don't take anything away, just add an infantry only ambush mode or something like that. Options are bad, it'll spread out the ...
- by Marston VC - at 2014.01.02 17:51:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |