| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1901. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big Popa Smurff wrote: Well i think all the heavies here would like to thank you Lance for making this awesome thread and for pushing so hard for our well needed buff. very happy with my HMG now, just needs a little work with the turning spee...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 18:30:00
|
1902. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
XxWarlordxX97 wrote: I'm happy yea we all are. I don't get what this guy's problem is... Is he the first legit person to be angry over the heavy buff? #umadbroyolo
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 04:52:00
|
1903. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Schalac 17 wrote: XxWarlordxX97 wrote: Schalac 17 wrote: XxWarlordxX97 wrote: Schalac 17 wrote: And I apply logic to the situation and no bumps. I am guessing that most of the heavies in this thread were scrubs that got their jaws o...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 04:48:00
|
1904. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Schalac 17 wrote: And I apply logic to the situation and no bumps. I am guessing that most of the heavies in this thread were scrubs that got their jaws on the bone CCP just threw us and forgot all about this thread. Don't think heavies for...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 04:24:00
|
1905. From bad to unplayable. Armor tanking logis, where are you all at? - in General Discussions [original thread]
If you think the GLU is bad...wait till all the tryhards start rocking the Duvolle tact. O wait, that's already happening
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 00:26:00
|
1906. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Hollow M Ling wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Scouts suits flaws are workable with your speed. But I understand if you have any frustrations - the vets around here who do use scouts don't unite like heavies and tankers do. So...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.11 00:24:00
|
1907. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ludvig Enraga wrote: I do post everywhere. What happened to Heavy and HMG 5 days ago has been scout's baseline for the past 8 months. Just wanted to make an observation that the majority of ppl would not care about game or weapon imbalance so l...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 23:56:00
|
1908. Heavy racial suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol kinda late for most heavies. I already have my Proto basic suit. I'm sure most competitive heavies also. I'll just invest in Assault for now. My heavy suit is where I want it anyway. When the other races come out, guess we'll have to suck it...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 21:34:00
|
1909. HMG buff and *NEW* csv data dump - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: ladwar wrote: with the new buff(10%) the duvolle TAR has a dps of 1032 boundless has a dps 933 lol The Tact. Duvolle needs a ROF adjustment...or increase in recoil. I know and people want a ...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 21:28:00
|
1910. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Raven Sol wrote: I'm not disagreeing with you in any point you brought up, but my observation remains the same. Call it an unintentional side effect or whatever you need to, but those moments have made dust actually fun, and the potential of it...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 21:17:00
|
1911. HMG buff and *NEW* csv data dump - in General Discussions [original thread]
ladwar wrote: with the new buff(10%) the duvolle TAR has a dps of 1032 boundless has a dps 933 lol The Tact. Duvolle needs a ROF adjustment...or increase in recoil.
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:57:00
|
1912. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Raven Sol wrote: I understand the complaints, god knows 98% of my deaths have been due to duvolle tacs within the past few days. But I have to say, I have been in some of the best firefights I've ever seen since I started playing dust after the...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:54:00
|
1913. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: the same way CCP catches botters, you can detect input speeds and consistency. The system can detect if you are spamming at unrealistic rates and at perfect intervals. Its all algorithms and easy to detect. not gonna ha...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:45:00
|
1914. We really need a consensus about what each class is supposed to do - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can put a sniper rifle on my heavy suit, and call that my main role. Every role or class is only limited by the weapons that they're allowed to use. True I won't have nanohives to resuply, but I can either call a logibro for ammo, or call in a...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:33:00
|
1915. HMG buff and *NEW* csv data dump - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynx Sinfar wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: They never included the dmg on those data dumps, at least not to my knowledge. They included price, max ammo, ammo per clip, meta lvl. for weapons. Other stuff included different data, like re...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:28:00
|
1916. HMG buff and *NEW* csv data dump - in General Discussions [original thread]
They never included the dmg on those data dumps, at least not to my knowledge. They included price, max ammo, ammo per clip, meta lvl. for weapons. Other stuff included different data, like rep tools showed HP rep for vehicles, and HP rep for ...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:19:00
|
1917. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Deluxe Edition wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Blondie Roads wrote: Well, I have been waiting till the 14th to pick a direction. I wanted to see what develops and what changes are made. My question to the communitee...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 20:05:00
|
1918. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Heimdallr69 wrote: Blondie Roads wrote: Well, I have been waiting till the 14th to pick a direction. I wanted to see what develops and what changes are made. My question to the communitee is...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 19:03:00
|
1919. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heimdallr69 wrote: Blondie Roads wrote: Well, I have been waiting till the 14th to pick a direction. I wanted to see what develops and what changes are made. My question to the communitee is this, Are you content with the tac assault rifles ...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 18:54:00
|
1920. So, is everyone content with the Tac - in General Discussions [original thread]
Doing 80 dmg now... yeeeeaaah. I test this gun in the MCC to see how fast i can fire it, like if it has a ROF cap. It has one, but it's nothing that a programmable modded controller can't handle. To be effective with a modded controller, you d...
- by Lance 2ballzStrong - at 2013.05.10 18:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |