| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2161. There's a ugly storm coming soon in forums... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Poplo Furuya wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: Who's the new guy? Is he a ******* idiot? Oh gawd this might not end well..... There is no new guy yet. It could be you! Applications for the post of Executive Producer are currently open . So who...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 23:15:00
|
2162. Normal, AR only and No AR Matches? - in General Discussions [original thread]
That way AR people don't have to deal with people who use more than one Gun and then the rest of us can enjoy an actual Game and we can have the other weapons made good and no one can complain about AR's Pretty Fuckin sad that we have to do this...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 23:11:00
|
2163. Imperfects. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Short Change Heroine wrote: Might be new and also a troll. Either way, never heard of ZionTCD. Not even a good forum post, never mind achieving a successful pub stomp. So shall I listen to you? No. Zion seems like a joke with the exection o...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 23:05:00
|
2164. An Idea for armor tanking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anyone? GM's? to move this?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 22:33:00
|
2165. If armor makes you slower Shields should make you more detectable - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why should Armor tankers be penalized for better plates? There should be three types of plates in addition to Ferros and Reactives Reactive plates Should retain current PG/CPU, repping rates, and movement penalties Basic Reactive Plates 50 HP Enh...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 22:09:00
|
2166. An Idea for armor tanking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
J-Lewis wrote: Cosgar wrote: The only problem with this is that shield tankers are still going to benefit from plates more than armor tankers. We need armor tanking suits to have armor related bonuses to give them an edge or all we'll be doi...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 21:18:00
|
2167. Dust is dead and CCP Killed it! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Banned From Forums wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Because of Hellstorm and EON? And that affects my enjoyment of the game...how? According to the tell all thread, Hellstorm is leaving because their members don't know their place and disrespectfu...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 21:14:00
|
2168. An Idea for armor tanking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cy Clone1 wrote: I think infantry should come up with a new term that doesn't include tanking. So we can avoid confusion. True, still any thoughts?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 16:32:00
|
2169. Tank Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Akurabis wrote: The ****** tank situation is exactly what CCP wants; think about it - What hooks a newbie more than popping a tank? What ragequits a newbie more than getting pwnd by a tank? That's why they have all these great and ready A...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 15:54:00
|
2170. An Idea for armor tanking. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Could this get a push over to Feedback/Requests
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 15:46:00
|
2171. Armor plates, ferroscale plates, armor reps and reactive plates need their value... - in General Discussions [original thread]
RINON114 wrote: D legendary hero wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why Increase reps? I'm just interested why you would say that. shields have a slight delay before reping, but once they do, they recover at enormus rates 20+ hp/s. if i have 400...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.22 15:41:00
|
2172. Armor plates, ferroscale plates, armor reps and reactive plates need their value... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DRDEEZE TWO POINTO wrote: Let's face it ccp can't fix **** and dust is going to be caned might as well play good games like battlefield. Okay then leave...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 06:21:00
|
2173. Balencing EVE vs DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Just like in DUST, it's a mixed bag of reactions. One noticeable difference is that almost no one in Eve asked for a respec. Thank you very much New Question how are Armor/Hull Tanking and Shield Tanking balenced?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 05:38:00
|
2174. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
You could go all passive it's called AFKing its a low-down tactic but still it works.
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 05:36:00
|
2175. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Dale Templar wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Cosgar wrote: You should have seen the rage induced over the Battleship nerf. It makes the Dust forums look civil. Good Point but are EVE forums ususally like this? In EVE they ha...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 05:33:00
|
2176. Balencing EVE vs DUST - in General Discussions [original thread]
How does balencing work in each game? How much influence does that Playerbase or CPM/CSM have in decisions? How do the forums get after changes are announced?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 05:28:00
|
2177. What if... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cy Clone1 wrote: I would rage beyond belief not only would I never play again I would make it my mission to see all of CCPs projects burn to ash, metaphorically speaking of coarse. It would be like those moments in an rpg when you've just compl...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 04:50:00
|
2178. So if designers of EVE nerf a ship... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: You should have seen the rage induced over the Battleship nerf. It makes the Dust forums look civil. Good Point but are EVE forums ususally like this?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 04:42:00
|
2179. What if... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: If they had to totally rework the game by re-balancing everything, adding more content, maps, game modes, and more EVE/Dust connection but had to reset SP, I wouldn't care. It would rid the game of some undesireables at the cost...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 04:40:00
|
2180. Let's analyze the reason for the Calogi nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Quoted from the dev blog: Quote: As mentioned above, these skill changes are largely to discourage assault-focused players from using the Logistics suit as their frontline choice. Ok, so what does this mean for al...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.19 04:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |