| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2001. Team Work Survey - in General Discussions [original thread]
A
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.29 20:36:00
|
2002. How to expand Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
GTA-V FTW wrote: this ^ killing police, prostitutes, etc No but it should move away from being a lobby shooter.
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.29 18:22:00
|
2003. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Question for EoN. Is winning better or is a good fight better?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.29 17:16:00
|
2004. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is going against EoN a good idea, no, but it is the right idea.
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.28 23:30:00
|
2005. Why do you play dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
tears4sale wrote: I dont play this crap game anymore same map same everything how freaking boring can you make this. 10 million Dust ISK for any mining ship of his to be destroyed.
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.28 20:35:00
|
2006. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baracka Flocka Flame wrote: Killar-12 wrote: How Come N-F and EoN won't fight? Fear? Non-Agression Pact? NF been dead for awhile, whats left is not the real NF. Sad we've lost competition
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.28 20:11:00
|
2007. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: Killar-12 wrote: How Come N-F and EoN won't fight? Fear? Non-Agression Pact? lol? NF joined LoI for the war against us... Did they attack us if they did it doesn't seem like it.
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 23:46:00
|
2008. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Mini-Para wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Well, why aren't you keeping us occupied then? Because your corporation ran away. Your fault, not ours. Don't blame the last man standing. I want a good debate, not a circ...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 23:45:00
|
2009. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
How Come N-F and EoN won't fight? Fear? Non-Agression Pact?
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 23:41:00
|
2010. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: Killar-12 wrote: The dark cloud wrote: Si withdrawl/disbanded so that EON can now be top. Was kinda shoking to see every EON corp below SI before they gave all their land away on the starmap. Actually by stopping t...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 22:16:00
|
2011. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mini-Para wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Well, why aren't you keeping us occupied then? Because your corporation ran away. Your fault, not ours. Don't blame the last man standing. I want a good debate, not a circle bully session- so to sp...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 22:14:00
|
2012. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Si withdrawl/disbanded so that EON can now be top. Was kinda shoking to see every EON corp below SI before they gave all their land away on the starmap. Actually by stopping to fight we simply neglect your existance and yo...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 22:10:00
|
2013. Don't ever mess with logistics - in General Discussions [original thread]
TEST is only weakened SI other other hand...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 21:41:00
|
2014. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mini-Para wrote: Baracka Flocka Flame wrote: I guess its a good thing this isnt a popularity contest. If only you could show that point of what its like for anew corp starting up to CCP and stop blaming the players for lack of competition,...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 21:31:00
|
2015. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
danny12343331 wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: ReGnUM Public Relations wrote: Good Morning,, As this time EoN will be reducing the threat level of the organization that terrorised us, known as Seraphim Initiative. On July 27 at 9:46 Am (Est),...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 21:30:00
|
2016. EoN Official Statement: Seraphim Initiative - in General Discussions [original thread]
First Prophet wrote: Mini-Para wrote: Baracka Flocka Flame wrote: Mini-Para wrote: Wow. Eons head just got even bigger somehow. They should probably know though that they can't really do much in PC anymore, what with being 'decent peop...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 21:29:00
|
2017. SCRs OP much? - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: Most of my HP is 50/50. 299Shield/277Armor. I have been doing that since Uprising to combat the Scrambler Rifle. I don't know how a weapon can be that blatantly powerful to its counterparts. I expect it to cut my shield down, but to...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.27 21:09:00
|
2018. Armor builds - in General Discussions [original thread]
Armor has always been about large buffers and resistances and slow reps I think reps are fine at the moment because shields are supposed to be high regen
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.26 06:53:00
|
2019. Armor builds - in General Discussions [original thread]
GET ATMESON wrote: Killar-12 wrote: GET ATMESON wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why don't armor plates give a flat 3% penalty? the plates should be made out of better material if they are prototype plates. If it was just 3% players would s...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.26 06:40:00
|
2020. Armor builds - in General Discussions [original thread]
GET ATMESON wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why don't armor plates give a flat 3% penalty? the plates should be made out of better material if they are prototype plates. If it was just 3% players would say its OP for proto plates. How? all Shi...
- by Killar-12 - at 2013.07.26 06:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |