| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
4321. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Void Echo wrote: your making yourself look to stupid to do more than one thing, if 6 avers are on the field, and 6 tankers, then 3 of them would each have their own tank to destroy, and i...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.22 00:10:00
|
4322. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Void Echo wrote: your making yourself look to stupid to do more than one thing, if 6 avers are on the field, and 6 tankers, then 3 of them would each have their own tank to destroy, and if theres...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.22 00:09:00
|
4323. You know when you're on a team of n00bs when... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: lrian Locust wrote: ...at the start of a battle, you jump out of the MCC and land on the corpses of 2 teammates who didn't press X. Feel free to post your experiences! 2 tanks with all the...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.22 00:05:00
|
4324. You know when you're on a team of n00bs when... - in General Discussions [original thread]
lrian Locust wrote: ...at the start of a battle, you jump out of the MCC and land on the corpses of 2 teammates who didn't press X. Feel free to post your experiences! 2 tanks with all the gunner seats taken spend the whole match shooting ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.22 00:01:00
|
4325. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: your making yourself look to stupid to do more than one thing, if 6 avers are on the field, and 6 tankers, then 3 of them would each have their own tank to destroy, and if theres 3 avrs on the field, those 3 avrs would dest...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:24:00
|
4326. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Wait you are saying that 5 Dedicated AV specialists could not take down 5 Maddy Tanks? I'm betting the other way. Were talking 15X Swarm groups in the air in 6 seconds. Stand on Nano's were talking infinite Ammo. Not to ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:19:00
|
4327. Scrambler Pistol vs SubMachineGun, which of the two?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: But Sidearms are meant to be finishers, and the Flaylock is good at that, I use it on some of my Shotty fits because its more reliable than my Primary to finish off an enemy. I'm being honest now, if there was one thing...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:16:00
|
4328. Scrambler Pistol vs SubMachineGun, which of the two?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sunbro is right. Sun bro is always right. PRAISE THE SUN -Solaire of Astora ''Sunbros are never right! They are Faithless weirdos.Now Polish my Toe Bones '' - PAPA NITO.
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:15:00
|
4329. People you hate... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hate my Co-Workers that go to the bathroom , take a dump and leave the turd there for me to find..... Someday...someday i'll make you eat it PHantom Crapperrr!!!!!!!!!!!
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:12:00
|
4330. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: that's not imbalance that's just ****** up matchmaking lol. its not my fault the enemy never bothered to bring out av or didn't bother to skill into it. if they bring out 3 avrs then those avrs have the ability to destroy...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:08:00
|
4331. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Void Echo wrote: im always giving you people real balance, yet you come round and blow it all away because you want call of duty. You are one of the most Biased Tankers i've ever met, not as...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:04:00
|
4332. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: and you are biased as well "if a 50 ton machine half the size of a building can solo, so can a dropsuit the size of a forge gun". that's biased It might sound biased,but its for the sake of balance. If we think of it ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 23:01:00
|
4333. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll just say it one more time. Tank or no tank, Proto or MLT. If you can Solo playing as a tanker; then you should be able to solo said tanker if you have equally tier'd equipment. Why because this is for balance sake, even if you sp...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:57:00
|
4334. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: im always giving you people real balance, yet you come round and blow it all away because you want call of duty. You are one of the most Biased Tankers i've ever met, not as much as SPRK4whateves...but still, your ''balanc...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:52:00
|
4335. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: well... the difference is that our vehicles cost over 10x more than a single dropsuit you have, we also spent 10x the amount of SP you do to deploy anything.. and if balance isn't based around personal investment in this ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:46:00
|
4336. Well. That was fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: The point im trying to get across is this type of match (This was my 2nd match out of the academy on my alt)Will most likely make any new player have a very bad first impression on the game Thus greatly reducing the chanc...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:40:00
|
4337. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: No no it does. Every AVer in that equation is self sufficient and can work together without even need to use team chat. If you mean to say a tank needs, a driver, gunner, and moduler to be useful not only do you kill any...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:34:00
|
4338. Scrambler Pistol vs SubMachineGun, which of the two?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Dexter307 wrote: Its only useful when the enemy has little to no health left, and in that situation the scrambler pistol is still better Of course its only useful when the enemy has little health. Its a sidearm. I...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:26:00
|
4339. Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
''Why Making Good AV Require Teamwork is A Bad Idea?'' IF tanks can solo , AV should be able to solo. If AV needs team work, Make tanks Equally Teamwork dependant. = Balance /End thread
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:25:00
|
4340. Scrambler Pistol vs SubMachineGun, which of the two?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Erth Deteis wrote: Scrambler Pistol vs SubMachineGun, which of the two?? 1) if you use a secondary, what do you use? 2) Why? 3)what do you think is better on a Assault caldari? Help me please, thanks I use a weapon that completes you...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.10.21 22:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |