| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2121. Fit of the Month - in General Discussions [original thread]
Geo MERCEDES wrote: A lot of people think that the best fits to run are different from month to month. I don't think they are correct. Sure, some things come and go in the endless nerf-buff cycle. But Scrambler Rifles have been the fit of the m...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 01:26:00
|
2122. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squagga wrote: I don't know why you guys are losing your bonus, or what else we're losing. I tend not to read any of these things until they actually come out, a defense mechanism I've developed with CCP. I don't know why we don't all get racia...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 01:24:00
|
2123. Post you top scores below! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zues III wrote: As above..... Picture or it didn't happen! 55-4 http://s824.photobucket.com/user/jimbo-86/media/20140202_173022_zps9abbb439.jpg.html Yeah i'm boasting I dont have images ,but i couldnt care less if you yound believ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 01:20:00
|
2124. Gal sentinel without resists is at 1810 eHP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Tile says it all. a Far cry from my 300 eHP Gal Scout for 1.8 lol. Peace, Godin Title* XD
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 01:10:00
|
2125. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: The SCR has a drawback, and you want to remove the drawback...why? Because the SCR has more than ONE Drawback. So the least they can do is reducing one of them.
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:45:00
|
2126. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
echo47 wrote: No the suit should lose the bonus. I would rather see a heat sink module that reduces heat build up, along with that a ROF increase module for CR and a module that increases range for the RR and AR. I would choose a heat sink modu...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:44:00
|
2127. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Don't miss... Well i dont. But the thing is, SOMETIMES, i have no other option than face 2 or more enemies at the same time....Even without a miss....
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:29:00
|
2128. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: Joel II X wrote: Prefer the RoF bonus on the Gallente to make the Plasma Rifle the best assault variant. The Gallente are supposed to be the best CQC fighters, so give them bonuses that focus on that (hipfire spread). If...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:25:00
|
2129. Proxy mine spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
Benjamin Ciscko wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Kharga Lum wrote: Instead of spamming 8 mines from two equipment slots why not increase the damage of each mine and reduce the # of active mines. Same damage output with less equipment to track...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:16:00
|
2130. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Overally , you didnt answer my question: If the A.Assault looses its bonus, should the SCR rifle get a 10 or 15% Heat buildup reduction as a bonus? The scrambler rifle (I think) was engineered with i...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:13:00
|
2131. Rail Turrets have an overheat function, why not Rail Rifle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok. And we can give the Proto Combat Rifles a PG requirement of 20, SAME as the SCR rifle too :3 (Or are you going to tell me the CR is NOT OP.... X) ..When its THE SAME as the RR )
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:06:00
|
2132. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: Please stop with the bold, it's just irritating to look at. Personally I think the Amarr assault should keep it's bonus, it's a good application of a bonus to a suit that creates synergy with it's intended weapons. To be hones...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.04 00:04:00
|
2133. Proxy mine spam - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kharga Lum wrote: Instead of spamming 8 mines from two equipment slots why not increase the damage of each mine and reduce the # of active mines. Same damage output with less equipment to track. I proposed this a while ago Making Prox mines...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:52:00
|
2134. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squagga wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Squagga wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Squagga wrote: I'm glad you lowered your request. Earlier you were saying 50%? One thing I think though is it should only get two of those charged shots, regu...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:51:00
|
2135. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squagga wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Squagga wrote: I'm glad you lowered your request. Earlier you were saying 50%? One thing I think though is it should only get two of those charged shots, reguardless of any buff. In the hands of a few ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:40:00
|
2136. List of possible balancing factors for 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
you good changes indeed. :3
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:38:00
|
2137. i want a RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: CaoticFox wrote: because its only fair... better yet... id be ok with a RESET!!! Respec is better I I got sent to 500k sp I'd quit. Same here.
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:35:00
|
2138. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: .....a NATURAL 10% or 15% HEAT REDUCTION as a buff? Considering the Amarr Assault will loose its 25% Laser weaponry HEAT SINK ? Discuss. i agree the Amarr assault SHOULD KEEP THE BONUS, t...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:29:00
|
2139. SHouldnt the SCRAMBLER RIFLE get.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Squagga wrote: I'm glad you lowered your request. Earlier you were saying 50%? One thing I think though is it should only get two of those charged shots, reguardless of any buff. In the hands of a few of you it would just be too dangerous. But ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:27:00
|
2140. O Stop with the MLT tanks Crying - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: Why are there MILITIA TANKS IN THE FIRST PLACE!!! Why is there a MLT forge, but no MLT HMG? AND THIS, ladies and gentlemen , is the FIRST TIME I AGREE WITH SPKR4. There should be MLT EVERYTHI...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2014.02.03 23:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |