| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
861. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well we weren't proud when you guys were rocking up with a fit that cost like 1/50th of our price and telling us that you guys were balanced despitole destroying the game for us :) #yolo #swag #tank514 #Imbetterthanyou #winneroftheuniverse #lolDUST
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 06:24:00
|
862. 8 tanks in a battle fields.. one full squad of proto Avers... No tank died...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ambush or Skirmish/Domi?
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 06:20:00
|
863. anyone else loosing intrest in Dust with this patch? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Still having much fun, came back, so glad I did. On cap reset, capped out a few hours later, sat up for two days straight just tanking away. Taking a step back for a little bit for Christmas, will try and get on and play a few matches every now an...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:41:00
|
864. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to their strength especially ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:39:00
|
865. Just Remove AV's entirely and i bet the Tankers will say its balanced. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nope, we understand the need for AV to be able to kill us, a lot of us are enjoying smashing things up, especially since in the last few months I can safely say I've lost hundred of millions of ISK due to AV being ******* ridiculous, but we do wan...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:37:00
|
866. Forget swarms for tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Okay. Respec then please. No you will forever have Tree Climbing V, Banana Eating V and Throwing Poop V.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:33:00
|
867. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Some people go about issues the wrong way on these forums......OK a lot of people do. Doing something like the op suggested would take away a fun aspect of the game. You don't know what they may call...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:32:00
|
868. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think having a low cap would be a bad idea, we already have a max 5 vehicle cap for each team anyways, it just means if the good tanker gets the tank out first, you're not gonna be able to have the option of outnumbering him with more tanks, and...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
869. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Sounds cool, an Infantry V Infantry function would be needed though. While it'd be cool, also Godin's idea of Vehicle v Vehicle webs, I think CCP should look at just AV v Vehicles to get the job and balance done, and then wo...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:23:00
|
870. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: This sounds like it will either be OP as hell or useless as anything. Please, elaborate? Everyones crying at Tanks for escaping, and I feel them, I run away easily. Let's pretend Web Mines were the approach taken within...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:12:00
|
871. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Give it a 30 meter range, make it a equipment. Lock on similar to a swarm, and fire at said vehicle. vehicle is now slowed for X amount of time. After period is over, the equipment has to cooldown. Make ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 02:05:00
|
872. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anmol Singh wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: I've made some posts, they're long, not many people read them, so this one is short. One of the best things this game can have when it comes to balancing AV and Vehicles (All Vehicles) are Webifiers, ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:59:00
|
873. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Texs Red wrote: Where it will go and how it functions will play a very important aspect. if it is a grenade then a single person can possibly solo AV. If it is a light weapon, AV teams would be needed. Although if it were a light weapon that w...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:57:00
|
874. Tank spam why it is happening... - in General Discussions [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: I keep hearing about this Militia Tank spam, and how strong it is, but the majority of the tanks being spammed don't even have a hardener, you could have two people chuck AV grenades and kill it no probl...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:52:00
|
875. Tank spam why it is happening... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: I keep hearing about this Militia Tank spam, and how strong it is, but the majority of the tanks being spammed don't even have a hardener, you could have two people chuck AV grenades and kill it no...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:50:00
|
876. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've made some posts, they're long, not many people read them, so this one is short. One of the best things this game can have when it comes to balancing AV and Vehicles (All Vehicles) are Webifiers, things that slow vehicles down to a crawl, min...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:47:00
|
877. Tank spam why it is happening... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I keep hearing about this Militia Tank spam, and how strong it is, but the majority of the tanks being spammed don't even have a hardener, you could have two people chuck AV grenades and kill it no problem. I do however believe hull prices (leave ...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:44:00
|
878. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: The issue is not the power of tanks. They are in a good place as it is. the issue is how many are getting deployed at once. I saw 12 tanks last battle. There were more people in tanks than running infantry. That's ridicu...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:41:00
|
879. Limit Havs deployed to 1 per side - in General Discussions [original thread]
What a boring idea, 1v1 would be no point in even having tanks tbh, the only reason to play is for the tank fights and you'll just have two railgun tankers sitting there trying to pop infantry from a distance rather than let someone else fight. Yawn.
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:38:00
|
880. Jumping on R.Es should detonate them - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryder Azorria wrote: Nah, don't want some random redberry accidently setting of a carefully laid tank trap. EDIT: Also, tanks don't even set of REs - they set of a proxie, which in turn sets of the REs. I wasn't refering to that, I was spea...
- by Jason Pearson - at 2013.12.16 01:13:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |