| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1121. CCP when are you going to include logistics into your events - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: every event you do relies on killing with certain weapons or certain suits but nothing ever relates to logis. what would i need with 100 proto light weapons or assault/heavy/scout suits. i have stacks what i have earned passi...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.16 00:11:00
|
1122. hiding posts - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm not sure if I'm late to know but you can hide posts
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.16 00:04:00
|
1123. (basic and militia tournament) I need help setting up - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: What would be the reward for winning the tournament? good point.... you have any ideas
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 23:59:00
|
1124. (basic and militia tournament) I need help setting up - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: NO vehicles? would be a worthy ruling also to be fair no tanks
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 23:32:00
|
1125. (basic and militia tournament) I need help setting up - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Infected One wrote: Sky Kage wrote: great idea +1 I've always wanted an STD only mode. Do we have to have an STD to qualify? I'm not really a huge fan of dirty girls....Dirty girls , yes. Dirty girls no. No just basic and militia....
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 23:15:00
|
1126. (basic and militia tournament) I need help setting up - in General Discussions [original thread]
I got the Idea from a corp named Tech Gaurd Well the tournament would messure which corp has the most skills with no advance or prototype. But I'm not the best at setting things like this up so please help me. First off it would be squad agains...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 23:04:00
|
1127. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arx Ardashir wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: Some one try to prove me wrong. This is the second post that I've read in the past five minutes where the OP asks everyone else to do work. How about you prove your point instead, since you started...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 22:35:00
|
1128. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
All you need are some enhanced hardeners fuel injector and your op
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 16:54:00
|
1129. new player advise please - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cmdr Wolfe wrote: hi all, as i am waiting to save up for my ps4, i thought id download dust 514 and test it out as saw it advertised on facebook, im a big battlefield 3 player and wanted to jump on these forums as soon as i could.. so do you...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 16:49:00
|
1130. Hardeners are OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Some one try to prove me wrong.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 16:44:00
|
1131. scrubs, tanks are not op - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: The problem is the only reasonable answer is Jihad Jeep, Forge Gun, Remotes, or another tank. Why does the swarm launcher even exist anymore? Why does the plasma cannon exist period? fixed
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 16:36:00
|
1132. scrubs, tanks are not op - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: HAVs are too good at anti infantry. At this level, AV should instakill HAVs, since HAVs get to instakill Infantry. Nerf Tanks to maintain sanity... Yes. Fixed. But yea tanks have no real weakness ther...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.15 16:33:00
|
1133. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tailss Prower wrote: Lucifalic wrote: Joseph Ridgeson wrote: I am a Tanker. I actually really like Remote Explosives. The only thing I am not a huge fan of, but I think it is still funny, is the suicide LAV. Getting kills on a tank with R...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 12:17:00
|
1134. CCP's responses - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: I'm sorry you feel that way? Well yea how much info did you get from ccp since January.... thats wat I thought. -_-
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 03:06:00
|
1135. its official, we need to nerf remote explosives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Realy of all things remotes there are rr, cr, tanks. But you want to nerf remotes.... I hope I never meat you.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 03:02:00
|
1136. CCP's responses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: are you entitled to long, indepth explanations for everyone of your questions? No there are dooches on forums though so I have to.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 02:50:00
|
1137. CCP's responses - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've gotten a lot of "no promises" "or another team is on that". What about you guys and no I'm not trying to make fun of CCP there responses just suck.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 02:44:00
|
1138. WolfmanGÇÖs Wonderful World of Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
New black and purple skin for Scrambler riffle and shoots purple blast
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 02:27:00
|
1139. WolfmanGÇÖs Wonderful World of Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mike Gunnzito wrote: Also, how about a new type of grenade? I was essentially thinking of something like an EMP. One with a very large blast radius (maybe 20m), but it doesn't to any dmg to armor. It's function is to completely drop shields to...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.14 02:24:00
|
1140. Hey CCP no respec to infantry looks like discrimination. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: A long time ago I witnessed when folks were made to ride in the back of the bus, no service at dinners, clubs, etc. It was a time of discrimination with no real basis other than Jim Crow "laws".. Be it right or wrong the...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2014.02.13 12:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |