| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
381. What color suits will you guys have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just waiting for True to come in with his all golden color scheme so his proto suits aren't looking all caldari... still just waiting
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 23:23:00
|
382. What color suits will you guys have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mejt0 wrote: Navy blue or solar blue. Though i don't know if they will add such colors. Basicly dark blue + smth. Ps. DCUO customization is simple and cool. I would like to see one in Dust. nice
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 23:21:00
|
383. What color suits will you guys have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: White and cupcake pink, because I'm comfortable with my masculinity. I guess you'll need this to.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 23:20:00
|
384. With matchmaking are squads being taken into account? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm just curious because it seems that that is the major problem. At least in my eyes.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 00:32:00
|
385. Thursday - in General Discussions [original thread]
DSTEEL STEEL wrote: Og original gamer You do know you just said, "Original gangster(or gamer) original gamer", right?
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 00:25:00
|
386. What color suits will you guys have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Likely just a money grab. But still I've been waiting for the day to make my suit black and purple, and name myself eggplant-man for so long . But what skins will you guys have I'm interested to see if I'll be fighting a bunch of bananas or someth...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.24 00:23:00
|
387. [Petition] Racial Tanks Naming. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ralden Caster wrote: So is the tank hull blue and black or white and gold? GOD NO!
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 02:11:00
|
388. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: That forces your side to use tanks to counter tanks, That's what we want, and I don't see any problem with it. I see a huge problem with it. For every move is a counter, you should...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 02:10:00
|
389. An other question for av - in General Discussions [original thread]
When shooting at hardeners do you guys ever think maybe I should save my ammo as I'm literally shooting at a wall? And no I don't care about maddies I only have one and reck with this tactic. Just a question.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 02:08:00
|
390. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Vicious Minotaur wrote: I get the feeling like some think ISK should be an integral part of the balance equation.... Well, we can't all be cool and intelligent. Any reason it s...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 02:05:00
|
391. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: This is from a tanker . Mathematical impossibilities for AV is a problem. Might I ask you why are you guys giving all you got on a hardened tank? Just a tip shoot at the tank if he puts up his hardener stop wait until h...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 01:59:00
|
392. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: One Eyed King wrote: They can solo and take on several people no problem. Get us to a place where tanks need 2 or 3 people defending it and I am fine with the hardeners. But they are NOT at that place now. Maybe you s...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 01:54:00
|
393. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
manboar thunder fist wrote: Tank can 2 shot my Python I can fire my whole reserve of XT missile launchers into a proto tank and it will not die. Even the double hardener fit seems to outrep my pathetic fire rate when the hardeners are down! G...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 00:37:00
|
394. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
MUNSON MANCHILD wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: I mean before maybe because they costed less, but I mean now... no. Your at most like 150k suit killing a 1.3 million tank? No. You should require teamwork to kill a tank. And please don't tell me ...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 00:25:00
|
395. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Yes, a tank should require multiple people to down. But a tank should also require multiple people to defend itself. Look at Titans in Eve. IT takes a whole bunch of people to kill them. But they need others to support t...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 00:22:00
|
396. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: J0LLY R0G3R wrote: You bloody shoot at me or even aim that turret my way. Don't think I"m going to just run off and hide. If I don't kill you, I'm at least going to hold you up from just patrolli...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 00:13:00
|
397. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: JARREL THOMAS wrote: Zepod wrote: If 2x = 1y, there's no actual reason to use x in any scenario with a remote amount of importance. Besides the fact that it doesn't cost 400k-1.3mill. Would it be Ok if it cost 1 B...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.13 00:12:00
|
398. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
J0LLY R0G3R wrote: You bloody shoot at me or even aim that turret my way. Don't think I"m going to just run off and hide. If I don't kill you, I'm at least going to hold you up from just patrolling the map before ya dip into the redline. Don...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.12 23:56:00
|
399. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zepod wrote: If 2x = 1y, there's no actual reason to use x in any scenario with a remote amount of importance. Besides the fact that it doesn't cost 400k-1.3mill.
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.12 22:57:00
|
400. Why do AVers still believe in 1v1 against tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I mean before maybe because they costed less, but I mean now... no. Your at most like 150k suit killing a 1.3 million tank? No. You should require teamwork to kill a tank. And please don't tell me "We get killed so much trying to kill it." I get k...
- by JARREL THOMAS - at 2015.04.12 22:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |