| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. Leaving battle should only cost you not benefit. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pretty lame pitch overall. Hard to tell if this was a troll or not but I am going to pretend it wasn't. A real immortal? Well, there ain't no such thing. These are players playing a dying F2P game that has so many troubles you couldn't beat them ...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.25 05:30:00
|
122. Where is this game? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: I miss the original Skirmish, I want something similar in Legion; attack/defend with multiple stages. PS2 has that.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.23 06:44:00
|
123. FATAL ERROR!. - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Do you recall what was happening at the time? Just asking them to fix some undefined action that resulted in a fatal error is optimistic at best. Plus they aren't working on the dust client anymore.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.23 06:43:00
|
124. all turret proficiencies provide no bonus - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
calisk galern wrote: really? seriously this is broken? if so then can we get it replaced with something that will work, should be possible with some of these hot fixes My timings with a stop watch showed little variation. I have tested with...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.23 06:40:00
|
125. Expanded Player cap & New Battle Modes - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There is no client updates planned for dust. All client work is on project legion, which is on PC.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.22 11:21:00
|
126. Fixing Small Blaster Turrets; The easy and efficient way - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
XxGhazbaranxX wrote: cut legion suggestions There are no client updates planned for dust. All client work is for the currently not approved project legion on PC. So, try to find a legion forum for your next set of missives.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.22 11:19:00
|
127. Fixing Small Blaster Turrets; The easy and efficient way - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Thanks for the feedback, it came at a good time. Project Legion is going to have missile turrets! Wow, who would have thought. We dust mercenaries know they don't work though as they are based on the broken dust turrets. D...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.22 11:16:00
|
128. skill point re-allocation to devs - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
No SP resets/refunds or anything beside 'oh crap, this was a terrible mistake'. Because decisions have consequences, even if those consequences are provided by CCP after the fact. I tried to get SP refunded for turret proficiency level 4 as it p...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:28:00
|
129. CAL vs GAL Tank - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Do you have a point?
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:24:00
|
130. What I find funny. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sorry, OP. There is no bug fixing going on. Many of the existing problems will require client side code changes and none are planned. No ETA for that matter. Server side changes are the only possible fixes.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:22:00
|
131. Why So Much Doom and Gloom? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Dunno; there are black knights whom feel its alright to go around attacking players who want to continue to play the game because from their perception they been betrayed in their minds. I don't mind them being angry th...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:20:00
|
132. Should we call them CCPberries? Maybe Iceberries? - in General Discussions [original thread]
bad berries At least it describes how they are at game development and project announcements.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:16:00
|
133. After more than two weeks discussing on the forums - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spike Slania wrote: You know, the one thing I don't get is from a marketing point of view. Here they are on the ps3, being the number 1 f2p on the ps3, and they're jumping ship to PC. Where on PC they will be over looked as a FPS since it's not...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.20 12:10:00
|
134. [Idea] RDV should appear to carry recalled vehicles away - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Luther Mandrix wrote: +1 -35 No New Work planned on the dust client side. Give it a rest.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 01:03:00
|
135. Pay for ammo? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
PS2 doesn't charge for ammo. Nor for suits. Or tanks. Or aircraft. Or the mechanized heavy they have. The only games I have had to pay for ammo actually produce a profit with very little effort. So I really don't see how this would be a good thing...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 01:01:00
|
136. Let the newberries know. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Good point, OP. Maybe the various wikis could add the information to their home pages. CCP wouldn't add it to the login in screen and they never would put a disclaimer in the PSN store where the life giving AUR is sold.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 00:57:00
|
137. No new client side changes planned. No nerfs then? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Well now that the idea of legion is out; you have to understand how testing has changed; back then test sessions were harder to put together due to having it being on the ps3; now a days they just use the legion client; ...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 00:55:00
|
138. Announcement:Dev Blog: Introducing Project Legion - in Announcement and Events [original thread]
Corp Jezus wrote: After reading several pages of irrelevant comments, i realised that people does not accept that Dust514 was not working as planned by CCP and that they are doing what is best for this "aspect" of Eve universe. From my point of...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 00:46:00
|
139. ETA on pilot suit and proto tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pretty much what they said, except for the optimist that thinks something could happen with pilot suits. That requires work, which is only going to happen in legion. Only dust work will be server side. Which would only be database changes.
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 00:33:00
|
140. No new client side changes planned. No nerfs then? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Dunno the meta on the field is slowing beginning to show the problems heavies are posing. Not my a lot but slowly; the only thing stopping them seemingly are cloaked scouts. Overall I think it would be just better to buf...
- by Glyd Path - at 2014.05.19 00:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |