| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
3121. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
deepfried salad gilliam wrote: Dust Junky 4Life wrote: Rogue Saint wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: Rogue Saint wrote: Jeez man, you're getting a AUR in return, what's your problem? All this BS about legal action and ****, stop playing. ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.23 04:26:00
|
3122. Response on legal action against CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
THIS is damn hilarious. his whole case rests on weather or not he can prove CCP + Sony EULA is unjust and unenforcable within the country of sale. and yet he never actually even attempts to do so, and hasnt read either EULA, or his own local l...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.23 03:57:00
|
3123. I am disappointed in the lack of duct tape on the combat rifle model - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: I looks like an SMG with a heavy barrel and optical sight. That doesn't seem very unique. Maybe alot of Minmatar weapons will use a modular design? Yeah, I thought it would look cool, but it is just a...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 14:24:00
|
3124. I am disappointed in the lack of duct tape on the combat rifle model - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: I looks like an SMG with a heavy barrel and optical sight. That doesn't seem very unique. Maybe alot of Minmatar weapons will use a modular design? minmatar teck is just pieces of guns slaped together to make different guns...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 13:34:00
|
3125. I am disappointed in the lack of duct tape on the combat rifle model - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Not even one little strip on the stock? At least make one part of it a different color so you can tell it was cobbled together from other things like all Minmatar tech. May I suggest bond-o as the appropriate color? ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 13:11:00
|
3126. How Many People Will Be Taking A Break If There's No FULL Respec In 1.7? - in General Discussions [original thread]
RKKR wrote: because the next patch (which will actually be in 4 patches) will be infantry focussed: infantry respect. BOOOM i belive the word you were looking for is REFUND. and only if a skill is removed or its function is durastically c...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 10:29:00
|
3127. How Many People Will Be Taking A Break If There's No FULL Respec In 1.7? - in General Discussions [original thread]
maeth-01 2501 wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: seeing as how we KNOW there isnt a full SP respec in 1.7 why does this thread start with "IF" Is there??.... have to admit I have not been on here in a while and im down on the gossip.... where...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 10:07:00
|
3128. How Many People Will Be Taking A Break If There's No FULL Respec In 1.7? - in General Discussions [original thread]
seeing as how we KNOW there isnt a full SP respec in 1.7 why does this thread start with "IF"
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 09:39:00
|
3129. What if? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meeko Fent wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: The community seems much warmer towards IWS than it once was. This is absolutely a good thing. I Guess its like a cycle We love IWS! We Hate IWS! We Love IWS! We hate IWS! Its a cycle. ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 05:52:00
|
3130. [CCP Please Read] - [Yelsha, You Too] - Regarding BPO Removal - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: Does this mean there is no counterpoint to my post? There has to be one internet lawyer out there that disagrees at least. Isn't there? naw your right, but unfortunatly it doesnt matter because the idiots complained becaus...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.22 05:31:00
|
3131. So the people complaining about BPOs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fargen Icehole wrote: Generally speaking, (using my vast knowledge of having taken a couple BLAW classes in college ) In the US, all contracts are bound by what is referred to as "good faith". The reason I bring this up, is because while Auru...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 16:19:00
|
3132. So the people complaining about BPOs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Korvin Lomont wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Because they want to feel like space lawyers, while failing at reading a document that protects CCP from all of it, that they signed The main problem h...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 15:12:00
|
3133. So the people complaining about BPOs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Because they want to feel like space lawyers, while failing at reading a document that protects CCP from all of it, that they signed The main problem here is the EULA does not protect CCP as the EULA...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 14:55:00
|
3134. Question to those compainging about AUR refunds for BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
i would like to point out that i do in fact have BPOs, and have purchased merc packs. and somehow i knew EXACTLY what would happen in this circumstance, and i knew becuase i ******* READ THE APPLICABLE LAWS AND AGREEMENTS
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 13:00:00
|
3135. Question to those compainging about AUR refunds for BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: I guess you read that AFTER my edit. Here let me copy-pasta it for you. EDIT: Oh and of course let me reiterate... EULAs are more or less useless. They do not stand up in the court of law. They are not binding legal co...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:56:00
|
3136. Question to those compainging about AUR refunds for BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Linky to collectors edition Hey llook at that, also not listed as bonus items, oh and what is this??? CCP wrote: These EVE: The Second Decade Collector's Edition...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:43:00
|
3137. Question to those compainging about AUR refunds for BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Linky to collectors edition Hey llook at that, also not listed as bonus items, oh and what is this??? CCP wrote: These EVE: The Second Decade Collector's Edition Items are permanent gear, requiring no restocking...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:29:00
|
3138. differences between 1.6 and 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech De Ra wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: darkiller240 wrote: umm what? whats confusing? its confusing to people that you made this thread as a compairison of 1.6 and 1.7 when what you meant...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:26:00
|
3139. Question to those compainging about AUR refunds for BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
dustwaffle wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: how on earth do you guys manage to function in society if you dont understand the basics of a contract. Don't need to function in society that much if you're under 18 dawggg if your under 18 you r...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:21:00
|
3140. differences between 1.6 and 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: darkiller240 wrote: umm what? whats confusing? its confusing to people that you made this thread as a compairison of 1.6 and 1.7 when what you meant to make was a thread bitching that we dont have vehicle locks yet.
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2013.11.21 12:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |