| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1041. Why can tanks solo, but not AV? - in General Discussions [original thread]
WP for damaging vehicles with AV weapons: BOOM, PROBLEM SOLVED (more Info in my signature)
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:44:00
|
1042. To the winy AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
WP for damaging vehicles with AV weapons: BOOM, problem solved
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:41:00
|
1043. F*** Tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Petition CCP to get WP for damaging the vehicle: problem solved. (More info in my signature)
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:40:00
|
1044. [suggestion] Give av a better purpose (not a buff/nerf, a purpose). - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: I wouldn't mind, but as long as the WP can only be generated by weapons classified as AV. Weapons Such As: Swarm Launchers
Forge Guns
Plasma Cannons
Remote Explosives
Proximity Explosives
AV Grenades
Flux Gr...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:38:00
|
1045. Lets All Be Gentlemen Here (Credit To gbghg) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Soldiersaint wrote: Atiim you and i both know this will never happen. sadly thats just how this cruddy world is. It could happen. If only pilots would stop wanting to solo everything in sight with little to no effort. Oops....
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:26:00
|
1046. A question for tankers (No QQ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: HAHA these answers show how Tankers think . So after a soldier risks his butt to run through enemy fire ALL the way to a tank, he still needs 6 remote explosives to blow it up? HAHAHAHAHAHA this is the kind of stuff t...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:23:00
|
1047. A question for tankers (No QQ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
3, If they have time to stick all three nanohives on my ass then they deserve to kill me
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 06:18:00
|
1048. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SponkSponkSponk wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: I don't think the glowing-hotter-than-the-sun hardener effect we have right now is really getting through to AVers that the tank has it's hardener on and has high resistance at the moment. Thi...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:46:00
|
1049. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: I think the tank speed is an indication that we'll be getting webs in 1.8. I hope so, that would be awesome. Way more exiting than right now
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:41:00
|
1050. Lets All Be Gentlemen Here (Credit To gbghg) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: I have not joined in with any discussion as there is too much aggressive passion, and too little fact. But passion is an important thing we should give some ear too. Those people raging. They clearly care about the gam...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:38:00
|
1051. Lets All Be Gentlemen Here (Credit To gbghg) - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: I personally think swarms could use a new range system. Something along the lines of the closer you are the more effective you're swarms are the farther you are the less effective you are (Like the regu...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:35:00
|
1052. CCP Laughter can be heard - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Ryder Azorria wrote: You could always, y'know, match your weapon to the tanks weakness and wait until it's hardeners are down - I hear teamwork is also pretty effective. Yeah,sadly tankers dont need teamwork giving ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:31:00
|
1053. CCP Laughter can be heard - in General Discussions [original thread]
Udirjfbehwur84 ch3orhf8ebf8eur fud fe cur hfndkxkurbdnfjckndhudncebr r xsj3xuehdufie8dbfdi 8rc7dbc7fhd.bu28shchsuxufbdjfuurhdir bcusb8xebd9e d8c xuc x8 rx8cbdjfujsvfoc7wkufyrvgars arsfxyfb uugj9g eb 8snxidkjxid. Yes, I just smashed my keyboard. Bu...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 01:30:00
|
1054. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: you know what? i am ******* sick of these discussions, all we see are the same ******* names bitching at each other over and over again, and each and every one of them on both sides of the AV vehicle divide just turns every single ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 00:08:00
|
1055. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Cosgar wrote: Why not work with vehicles. All this drama splits our community apart. Why would anyone work with vehicles? They currently require no teamwork, and when used solo can provide the same performance as a full squad...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.13 00:03:00
|
1056. DUST 514 is unbalancable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Honestly it feels like av is ineffective because they are attacking at the wrong time with the wrong weapon. To AV: Know your enemy better. The best is if you actually know how to tank properly.
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 23:46:00
|
1057. DUST 514 is unbalancable. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: 1 swarmer to take out a vehicle. Nobody but a select few is doing it right. yep, very easy to do under the right circonstances (except if it's a shield tank).
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 23:42:00
|
1058. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: The Attorney General wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: Sounds like we are back to chrome days, whoever has the most tanks wins, yay for whiny useless bastards who can only do anything with about 3 feet of steel between them and...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 23:25:00
|
1059. AV'ers and infantry men. Rally behind me against VEHICLES.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: speed is only 1 issue which is in our faces at the moment. wait till its fixed and the main issue will be that tanks and especially dropships are still almost indestructible. if 3 ...
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 23:18:00
|
1060. [Request] Vehicle damage WP for AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I also made a thread about this. Link is in my signature actually
- by Flix Keptick - at 2013.12.12 21:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |