| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
761. Thinking of getting all assaults to 5 with a respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Seems boring I know, but i hate being a scout and a heavy. I could get all the mando suits to 5 cos that would be fun, just not sure if i should.
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.21 19:24:00
|
762. Thinking of getting all assaults to 5 with a respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
As the title says, is there anyone who can tell me if this would be a good move? i mean i have played gal assault since it was introduced but have done very little with the others, so dont have much of an idea on how they perform.
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.21 19:06:00
|
763. Missing BPO suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Regis Blackbird wrote: Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: Pretty simple really. 'Quafe' Logistics 'Quafe' Commandos 'Templar' Scout A-I (given to those of us with the second decade mystery code) 'Templar' Commando A-I (given to those of us with the se...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.21 15:36:00
|
764. Daily mission strange extra rewards - in General Discussions [original thread]
I so hope this is a thing. I want a plasma cannon that shoots snowballs.
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.17 13:42:00
|
765. Why do the cap is still 750k? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It should be lowered to about 400k. If someone can reach the 750k cap with 3 omega boosters they are getting 3 million SP a week. While it may not happen frequently, I believe its too high.
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.17 13:34:00
|
766. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Kierkegaard Soren wrote: I wasn't around for skirmish 1.0 but I love th idea of tanks playing a central role in destroying nulls. Shaping the battlefield i...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.16 20:38:00
|
767. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Vesta Opalus wrote: Kierkegaard Soren wrote: I wasn't around for skirmish 1.0 but I love th idea of tanks playing a central role in destroying nulls. Shaping the battlefield is one of the few elements I miss from BF. I...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.16 18:07:00
|
768. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: I agree with OP that I enjoyed seeing and being a part of bigger tank battles, with escalation. I also agree that since we are having tanks in the game, there should be some variety...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.15 21:38:00
|
769. On vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please stop saying AV is supposed to be a deterrent, because its not. It is designed to blow your tank sky high. Swarms can't hurt infantry, why should it only be able to scare you off until you have recovered and not kill you? Tanks do need to be...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.15 15:14:00
|
770. Changing the Caldari - in General Discussions [original thread]
TRULY ELITE wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: TRULY ELITE wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: I don't think they could stand to lose any armour. Honestly, the only cal suit that is under performing is the assault, I'd like to see it get bonuses to extend...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.14 22:13:00
|
771. Does Stacking.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
it should, just test it on installations
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.13 22:01:00
|
772. Oh my gawd, oh my gawd, oh my gawd - in General Discussions [original thread]
I get the feeling its a troll but i hope that its true. i dont wanna buy anymore keys.
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.13 12:02:00
|
773. Petition to change the useless Gallente Assault bonus (video inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: The problem with range is that DPS is balanced against range. So AR has the most DPS...if the range increases now it's encroaching on another rifle's range, but with more DPS, rendering that other rifle fall less effective o...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 16:58:00
|
774. Petition to change the useless Gallente Assault bonus (video inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: I don't know about you...... but I notice the difference between using the AR on my scouts/logis. compared to my gall assault. the bonus specifically states from hip-fir...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 16:41:00
|
775. Petition to change the useless Gallente Assault bonus (video inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: I don't know about you...... but I notice the difference between using the AR on my scouts/logis. compared to my gall assault. the bonus specifically states from hip-fire. the accuracy from hip fire at gall assault 5 a...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 16:13:00
|
776. Petition to change the useless Gallente Assault bonus (video inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Then the Gallente would end up with an even worse bonus and the Caldari would be screwed over by the slow reload rate of the RR. FAster reload speed for weapons that are designed for CQ is NOT A...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 15:43:00
|
777. Before Remote Explosives get Nerfed into pure AV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: Atiim wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Does the OP realize that the suggestion is another special AV RE, and the other would be the current one, except with a slightly slower activatio...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 14:33:00
|
778. Before Remote Explosives get Nerfed into pure AV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Echo 1991 wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Does the OP realize that the suggestion is another special AV RE, and the other would be the current one, except with a slightly slower activation timer, because it was designed to be a tra...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 14:13:00
|
779. Before Remote Explosives get Nerfed into pure AV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Does the OP realize that the suggestion is another special AV RE, and the other would be the current one, except with a slightly slower activation timer, because it was designed to be a trap, not a grenade? we have those. t...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 13:41:00
|
780. I have held off on saying it but... BANDWIDTH SUCKS - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Wait? What? It's not built in. And you can place those RE's anywhere - the tanker doesn't have to rush anything, he can just simply try to leave his own red-line. If you want to spam RE's then you'll need to dedicate your s...
- by Echo 1991 - at 2014.12.12 13:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |